Intellectual Creativity, the Arts, and the University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2022.022Słowa kluczowe
intellectual virtues, creativity, acquaintance, education, universityAbstrakt
As virtues of intellectual character are commonly discussed, they aim at propositional intellectual goods. But some creative works—especially those in music and the visual arts—are not primarily intended to gain, keep, or share propositional goods such as truth, knowledge, and understanding. They aim at something else. Thus, to conceive of intellectual creativity in a way that accords with standard discussions of intellectual virtue is to exclude paradigmatic works of the creative intellect. There is a kind of puzzle here: it appears that we cannot maintain both the commonly-discussed notion of intellectual virtue and the claim that, say, Beethoven’s Ninth, or Monet’s Water Lilies, are central cases of intellectually virtuous creativity. We provide a two-part solution to the puzzle. First, we suggest that some works of music and visual art can convey propositional goods. Second, we appeal to the notion of acquaintance as an epistemic good that is conveyed through creative artistic and musical to an extent not conveyed in standard prose works. In this respect, intellectual creativity is the virtue that breaks the propositional mold of much contemporary virtue epistemology.
Bibliografia
Baehr, Jason. 2018. “Intellectual Creativity.” In Creativity and Philosophy, edited by Berys Gaut and Matthew Kieran, 42–59. New York, Routledge Press.
Bonds, Mark Evan. 2014. Absolute Music: The History of an Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cahill, Thomas. 1995. How the Irish Saved Civilization: The Untold Story of Ireland’s Heroic Role from the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Medieval Europe. New York: Anchor Books.
Dahlhaus, Carl. 1989a. The Idea of Absolute Music. Trans. Roger Lustig. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dahlhaus, Carl. 1989b. Nineteenth-Century Music. Trans. J. Bradford Robinson. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Flexner, Eleanor. 1959. Century of Struggle: The Woman’s Rights Movement in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Fujimura, Makoto. 2020. Art and Faith: A Theology of Making. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Gaut, Berys. 2004. “Art and Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Jerrold Levinson, 436–450. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gaut, Berys. 2006. “Art and Cognition.” In Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, edited by Matthew Kieran, 115–126. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Gaut, Berys and Matthew Kieran. 2018. Eds., Creativity and Philosophy. New York: Routledge Press.
Gombrich, E.H. 2011. The Story of Art. New York: Phaidon Press.
Gribbin, John. 2004. The Scientists. New York: Random House.
Kant, Immanuel. 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kieran, Matthew. 2019. “Creativity as an Epistemic Virtue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Virtue Epistemology, edited by Heather Battaly, 167–77. New York: Routledge.
McGrew, Timothy. 2009. “Introduction to Part I.” In Philosophy of Science: An Historical Introduction, edited by Timothy McGrew, Mark Alspector-Kelly, and Fritz Allhoff, 5–11. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Munitz, Milton. 1981. Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Roberts, Robert and Jay Wood. 2007. Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, Charles S. 1876. Psalms & Hymns, & Spiritual Songs: A Manual of Worship for The Church of Christ. New York: A.S. Barnes and Company.
Seeger, Charles. 1924. “On the Principles of Musicology.” The Musical Quarterly 10/2: 244–250.
Seeger, Charles. 1925. “Prolegomena to Musicology: The Problem of the Musical Point of View and the Bias of Linguistic Presentation.” Eolus: A Review for New Music 4/2: 12–24.
Sharif, Malik. 2019. Speech About Music: Charles Seeger’s Meta-Musicology. Vienna: Hollitzer Verlag.
Smashing Pumpkins. 1995. “Bullet with Butterfly Wings.” Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness. New York: Virgin Records.
Taruskin, Richard. 2005. The Oxford History of Western Music, volume 2. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2006. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. New York: Routledge Press.
Zagzebski, Linda. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Nathan King, Rebecca Strauch
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 568
Liczba cytowań: 0