In Favour of Dispositional Explanations. A Christian Philosophy Perspective with Some References to Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2022.012Słowa kluczowe
philosophy of causality, dispositional explanations, divine action and natural world, philosophy of economicsAbstrakt
From among philosophical concepts of explanation those referring to causes have been the most influential. The aim of this paper it to show that a particular kind of causal explanations, namely dispositional explanations are particularly suited to explain the workings of the world. Apart from purely philosophical arguments, I claim that the view treating dispositions as important elements of the basic ontology of nature is in line with the Christian worldview and the ways God impacts the world. Also, this paper shows that dispositional explanations are not only appropriate in the domains studied by natural sciences but also in the ones being under investigation in social sciences, and thus the case of economics.Bibliografia
Aristotle (1984), Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Artigas M. (2001), The Mind of the Universe. Understanding Science and Religion, Templeton Foundation Press, London.
Bird A. (2013), "Limitations of Powers", in: R. Groff, J. Greco (eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy. The New Aristotelianism, Routledge, London, 25-47.
Broadie S. (2012), "The Ancient Greeks", in: H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, & P. Menzies (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 73-91.
Cartwright N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cartwright N. (1993), "Is Natural Science ‘Natural’ Enough?: A Reply to Philip Allport", Synthese, vol. 94(2), 291-301.
Cartwright N. (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cartwright N. (2004), "No God, No laws", manuscript presented at the conference ‘God and the laws of nature’, organised by the John Templeton Foundation, 11-13 October 2004, http://personal.lse.ac.uk/cartwrig/Papers/NoGodNoLaws.pdf
Cartwright N. (2007), Hunting Causes and Using them Approaches in Philosophy and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cartwright N., Pemberton J. (2013), "Aristotelian Powers: Without Them, What Would Modern Science Do?", in: R. Groff, J. Greco (eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy. The New Aristotelianism, Routledge, London, 93-112.
Chakravartty A. (2007), A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Choi S. (2011), "Finkish Dispositions and Contextualism", The Monist, vol. 94, 103-120.
Choi S. (2021), "Dispositions", in: E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/dispositions/
Clayton P. (1997), God and Contemporary Science, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Crespo R. (2013), A Re-Assessment of Aristotle's Economic Thought, Routledge, London.
Davies P. (1992), "Is the Universe a Machine", in: N. Hall (ed.), The New Scientist Guide to Chaos, Penguin, London.
Dodds M. (2016), Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas, Catholic University of America Press, Washington DC.
Fetzer J. (1977), "A World of Dispositions", Synthese, vol. 34(4), 397-421.
Göcke B. (2015), "Did God Do It? Metaphysical Models and Theological Hermeneutics", International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, vol. 78(2), 215-231.
Hardt Ł. (2017), Economics without Laws. Towards a New Philosophy of Economics, Palgrave, Cham.
Hardt Ł. (2021), "An Essay on Humble Economics", in: P. Róna, L. Zsolnai, A. Wincewicz-Price (eds.), Words, Objects and Events in Economics, Springer, Cham, 13-32.
Harré R. (1970), "Powers", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 21, 81-101.
Hausman D. (1998), Causal Asymmetries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hempel C. (1978), "Dispositional Explanations", in: R. Tuomela (ed.), Dispositions, Springer, Dordrecht, 137-146.
Hempel C., Oppenheim P. (1948), "Studies in the Logic of Explanation", Philosophy of Science, vol. 15(2), 135-175.
Koperski J. (2020), Divine Action, Determinism, and the Laws of Nature, Routledge, London.
Lawson T. (1997), Economics and Reality, Routledge, London.
Lawson T. (2015), Essays on the Nature and State of Modern Economics, Routledge, Abingdon.
Lewis D. (1986), On the Plurality of Worlds, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Mackie J.L. (1974), The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mantzavinos C. (2016), Explanatory Pluralism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mellor D.H. (1974), "In Defense of Dispositions", The Philosophical Review, vol. 83(2), 157-181.
Merton T. (1956), Thoughts in Solitude, Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, New York.
Mill J.S. (1843), A System of Logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive, John W. Parker, London.
Molnar G. (2003), Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mumford S. (2008), Dispositions, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
O’Connor T. (2020), "Emergent Properties", in. E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/properties-emergent/
Peacocke A. (1993), Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine and Human, SCM Press, Minneapolis.
Popper K. (1978), "The Propensity Interpretation of Probabilities", in: R. Tuomela (ed.), Dispositions, Springer, Dordrecht, 247-265.
Popper K. (1995), A World of Propensities, Thoemmes Press, Bristol.
Psillos S. (2008), "Cartwright’s Realist Toil: From Entities to Capacities", in: L. Bovens, C. Hoefer, and S. Hartmann (eds.), Nancy Cartwright’s Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York, 167-195.
Quine W. (1978), "Disposition", in: R. Tuomela (ed.), Dispositions, Springer, Dordrecht, 155-161.
Robbins L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan, London.
Rodrik D., Subramanian A. (2009), "Why Did Financial Globalization Disappoint?", IMF Staff Papers, vol. 56, 112-138.
Róna P. (2018), "Ontology and Economics", in: P. Róna, L. Zsolnai (eds.), Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics, Springer, Cham, 5-8.
Schultz W. (2009), "Dispositions, Capacities, and Powers. A Christian Analysis", Philosophia Christi, vol.11(2), 221-238.
Schurz G. (2004), "Normic Laws, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, and the Unity of Science", in: S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 181-211.
Smith A. (1776/1994), The Wealth of Nations, Random House, New York.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Scientia et Fides
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY ND 4.0. Posiadaczem prawa autorskiego (Licencjodawcą) jest Autor, który na mocy umowy licencyjnej udziela nieodpłatnie prawa do eksploatacji dzieła na polach wskazanych w umowie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji niewyłącznej na korzystanie z Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego w następujących polach eksploatacji: a) utrwalanie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; b) reprodukowanie (zwielokrotnienie) Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego drukiem i techniką cyfrową (e-book, audiobook); c) wprowadzania do obrotu egzemplarzy zwielokrotnionego Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego; d) wprowadzenie Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego do pamięci komputera; e) rozpowszechnianie utworu w wersji elektronicznej w formule open access na licencji Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0) poprzez platformę cyfrową Wydawnictwa Naukowego UMK oraz repozytorium UMK.
- Korzystanie przez Licencjobiorcę z utrwalonego Utworu ww. polach nie jest ograniczone czasowo ilościowo i terytorialnie.
- Licencjodawca udziela Licencjobiorcy licencji do Utworu/przedmiotu prawa pokrewnego nieodpłatnie na czas nieokreślony
PEŁEN TEKST UMOWY LICENCYJNEJ >>
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 1402
Liczba cytowań: 0
