La relación trascendental aplicada a la relación alma y cuerpo en el hombre
Parole chiave
Philosophical Anthropology, Metaphysics, Psychology, Soul-body relationshipAbstract
The transcendental relationship applied to the relationship soul and body in man
My goal is to analyse, first, the meaning of the category of the relationship, according to the concepts contained in the DM 47 over the predicamental and/or transcendental relationship category, applying it to the existing in the cosmos, the relationship between knowledge and the thing known and the compositum body-soul. Here I will make a reference to the similarity between Suarez and Kant about the postulate of the existence of God and the immortality of the human soul.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Agustín de Hipona. 2007. Ciudad de Dios. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
Aristóteles. 1987. Metafísica. Edición trilingue de Valentín García Yebra. Madrid: Gre-dos.
Avicena. 1973. The Metaphysica of Avicenna (Ibn Sina). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Boyer, Charles. 1947. “Nature pure et surnaturel dans le Surnaturel du Père de Lubac.” Gregorianum, 28: 379-395.
Blic, Jacques de. 1946. “Quelques vieux textes de la notion d’ordre surnaturel.” Melanges de science religieuse, 3: 359-362.
Castellote, Salvador. 19822. Die Anthropologie des Suárez. Freiburg i. Breisgau: Alber Verlag. Internet:www.salvadorcastellote.com/investigacion
De Lubac, Henry. 2000. Le mystère du surnaturel. Paris: Cerf.
Escoto (Juan Duns). 1912. Commentaria oxoniensia (opus oxoniense) in I. et II. librum Sententiarum, edidit M. F. Garcia. Ad Claras Aquas (Quaracchi): Collegium S. Bonaventurae.
Friedmann, Hermann. 1954. Epilegomena. Zur Diagnose des Wissenschafts-Zeitalters. München: Beck.
García Cuadrado, José Ángel. 2015. “La armonía de facultades en la gnoseología de Francisco Suárez.” Pensamiento, 71: 587-615.
Grau, Andrés. 2002. “La función del entendimiento agente en la epistemología de Francisco Suárez (1548-1617).” Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval, 9: 185-203.
Kant, Inmanuel. 2003. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Hrsg. von Horst D. Brandt und Heiner F. Hamburg: Klemme, Meiner.
Kant, Inmanuel. 1999. Crítica del juicio seguida de las observaciones sobre el asentimiento de Lo bello y lo sublime, traducción por Alejo García Moreno y Juan Rovira. Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes.
Luis de Granada (Fray). 1908. “Introducción al símbolo de la fe.” En Obras, editado por Fr. Justo Cuervo. Madrid: Imp. de la Viuda e Hija de Gómez Fuentenebro.
Rof Carballo, Juan. 1949. Patología psicosomática. Madrid: Ed. Paz Montalvo.
Schnepf, Robert. 2006. Die Frage nach der Ursache. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Schmutz, Jacob. 2001. “La doctrine médiéval des causes et la théologie de la nature pure (XIIIe-XVIIe siècles).” Revue thomiste, 102: 217-264.
South, James B. 2001a. “Suárez on Imagination.” Vivarium, 39/1: 119-158.
South, James B. 2001b. “Suárez and the Problem of External Sensation.” Medieval Phi-losophy and Theology, 10/2: 217-240.
Suárez, Francisco. 1856a. „Tractatus De anima.” En Opera Omnia. Vol. III. Paris: Vivès.
Suárez, Francisco. 1856b. „De opere sex dierum.” En Opera Omnia. Vol. III. Paris: Vivès.
Suárez, Francisco. 1856c. „De ultimo fine hominis.” En Opera omnia, Vol. IV. Paris: Vivès.
Suárez, Francisco. 1857. „De Gratia.” En Opera omnia, Vivès, Vol. VII. Paris: Vivès.
Suárez, Francisco. 1861. „Disputationes Metaphysicae.” En Opera Omnia. Vol. XXVI. Paris: Vivès.
Suárez, Francisco. 1978. De anima Commentaria una cum quaestionibus en Libros Aris-totelis De anima. Edición crítica Salvador Castellote. Prólogo de X. Zubiri. Vol. I. 1978. Madrid: Sociedad de Estudios y Publicaciones.
Suárez, Francisco. 1981. De anima Commentaria una cum quaestionibus en Libros Aris-totelis De anima. Vol. II. Madrid: Labor.
Suárez, Francisco. 1991. De anima Commentaria una cum quaestionibus en Libros Aris-totelis De anima. Vol. III. Madrid: Fundación Xavier Zubiri.
Zubiri, Xavier. 1951. Naturaleza, historia y Dios. Madrid: Editora Nacional.
Zubiri, Xavier. 1988. Hombre y Dios. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 737
Number of citations: 0
