AI Machines vs the Non-Processing Minds of Classical Theism
Transparency, Trust, and the Deep Black-box Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2026.018Palabras clave
artificial intelligence, classical theism, unchangeable mind, inferential internalism, religious faith, black-box problemResumen
In the paper I contrast what I take to be a universal feature of all the AI research – namely focusing on processing information or transitions from one state of a machine to another – with the role assigned to non-processing minds in the classical theism framework. I briefly discuss the latter in epistemological context – the issue of inferential internalism and some problems of transparency, opacity, and trust. In this I show that the contrast between AI and the classical theism outlook is highly relevant for the cluster of issues relating to transparency or opacity, reliabilism, and trust, which is discussed today as the black-box problem. In particular, I identify in this context what I take to be the most serious aspect of the black-box problem; I reject the idea that the problem is a superficial one; and I claim that it poses basic limits on the AI research and cannot be solved along the lines of Explainable Artificial Intelligence.
Citas
Auriol, Peter. 1952. Scriptum Super Primum Sententiarum. Prologue – Distinction I, ed. By E.M. Buytaert OFM. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: The Franciscan Institute.
Boghossian, Paul. 2001. “Inference and Insight.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63: 633–40.
Boghossian, Paul. 2003. “Blind Reasoning.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 77: 225–48.
Boghossian, Paul. 2014. “What is inference?” Philosophical Studies 169: 1–18.
Bonezzi, Andrea, Ostinelli, Massimiliano, Melzner, Johann. 2022. “The Human Black-Box: The Illusion of Understanding Human Better Than Algorithmic Decision-Making.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001181.
Brożek, Bartosz, Furman, Michał, Jakubiec, Marek, Kucharzyk, Bartłomiej. 2024. „The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 32: 427–40.
Burrell, Jena. 2016. “How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms.” Big Data&Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512.
Davies, Brian. 1993. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawson, John W., Jr. 2010. Why Prove it Again? Alternative Proofs in Mathematical Practice. New York: Birkhäuser.
Durán, Juan Manuel, Jongsma Karin Rolanda. 2021. “Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI.” Journal of Medical Ethics 47: 329–35.
Durán, Juan Manuel, forthcoming. “Beyond transparency: computational reliabilism as an externalist epistemology of algorithms.” Forthcoming in Philosophy of Science for Machine learning: Core Issues and New Perspectives, edited by Juan M. Durán and Giorgia Pozzi, available at https://philpapers.org/archive/DURMLJ.pdf.
Eschenbach, Warren J. von. 2021. “Transparency and the Black Box Problem: Why We Do Not Trust AI.” Philosophy & Technology 34: 1607–22.
Geach, Peter Thomas. 1977. “Can God Fail to Keep Promises?” Philosophy 52: 93–95.
Maurus, Sylvestrus. 1876. Quaestiones Philosophicae, t. 1: Summulae et quaestiones prooemiales logicae, Paris: Ch. Taranne.
Pázmány, Petrus. 1894. Dialectica, ed. S. Bognár. Budapest: Typis Regiae Scientiarum Universitatis.
Polizzius, Iosephus. 1675. Disputationes philosophicae. Tomus Primus De Logica. Palermo.
Quinn, Patrick. 2001. “Aquinas’s Views on Teaching.” New Blackfriars 82: 108–20.
Roosta, Seyed H. 2000. Parallel Processing and Parallel Algorithms. New York: Springer.
Siebert, Matthew Kent. 2015. “Aquinas on Believing God.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Catholic Philosophical Association 89: 97–107.
Syropoulos, Apostolos. 2008. Hypercomputation. Computing Beyond the Church-Turing Barrier. New York: Springer.
Van Leeuven Jan, Wiedermann Jiří, “The Turing Machine Paradigm in Contemporary Computing.” In Mathematics Unlimited – 2001 and Beyond, edited by Björn Engquist and Wilfried Schmid, 1139–56. New York: Springer.
Zednik, Carlos. 2021. “Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence.” Philosophy & Technology 34: 265–88.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Michał Głowala
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 108
Number of citations: 0
