Confinamiento, control social del espacio y libertad religiosa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.008Palabras clave
control social, espacio, distancia social, pandemia, nuevos usos sociales, libertad religiosaResumen
El pensamiento político, desde Aristóteles a Lefebvre, ha otorgado relevancia al control del espacio como actividad propia del poder político. Las medidas extraordinarias tomadas por las autoridades políticas mundiales desde comienzos de 2020 bajo la rúbrica de lucha contra la pandemia han incluido confinamientos domiciliarios masivos, bloqueo de la movilidad, distancias interpersonales de seguridad higiénica y otras formas de control del espacio. De manera relevante, los espacios dedicados al culto religioso (iglesias, etc.) fueron sometidos a una regulación extraordinaria. En el ejercicio de este nuevo control del espacio ha desempeñado un papel relevante el control social (obligación de declarar estado de salud, incitación a la denuncia del infractor…) estimulado desde las autoridades mediante diversos medios de nueva educación social generando nuevos usos sociales en cuanto a la gestión del espacio. De este modo, la libertad religiosa y la autonomía de la Iglesia afrontan nuevos retos ante el control extraordinario del espacio religioso por parte del poder civil y por la presión del control social. Las nuevas formas de control incorporadas a los usos merecen ser críticamente revisadas en busca de verdaderos espacios de libertad que no sean sacrificados en nombre de una supuesta ciencia.
Citas
Abbate, Stefano. 2021. “Capital y Estado: fronteras de la precariedad en la posmodernidad.” In Posmodernidad y control social, edited by Miguel Ángel Belmonte, 63–88. Barcelona: Tirant.
Amoore, Louise. 2009. “Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror.” Antipode 41 (1): 49–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x.
Aristotle. 1944. Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Auge, Marc. 1992. Non-lieux, introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris: Seuil.
Blicharz, Grzegorz, Maria Alejandra Vanney & Piotr Roszak (eds). 2020. The Battle for Religious Freedom: Jurisprudence and Axiology. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IWS.
Boden, Deirdre & Harvey L. Molotch. 1994. “The Compulsion of Proximity.” In Space, Time and Modernity, edited by Roger Friedland and Deirdre Boden, 257–286. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cortina, Adela. 2020. Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Barcelona: Paidos.
Darsie, Camilo & Douglas Luís Weber. 2020. “Disease and space control: issues about dispersion and isolation in pandemic times?” Journal of Infection Control 9(2): 47–48.
Fitz-Gibbon, Kate & Silke Meyer. 2020. “Coronavirus: Fear of family violence spike as COVID-19 impact hits households.” Monash Lens. Retrieved from https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2020/03/18/1379841/coronavirus-fear-of-family-violence-spikeas-covid-19-impact-hits-households
Florida, Richard. 2010. La clase creativa: la transformación de la cultura del trabajo y el ocio en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Paidos.
Guo, Xuezhi. 2012. China’s Security State: Philosophy, Evolution, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huzarek, Tomasz. 2021. “The Theological Sources of Human Identity.” European Journal of Science and Theology 17 (6): 29–38. http://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/91/3_Huzarek.pdf
Jung, Hoyoon. 2021. “State within a state: Gang-enforced lockdowns in Rio’s favelas amid the COVID-19 pandemic and its sociopolitical implications in Brazil.” International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies 19 (2): 9–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0055/CGP/v19i02/9-18.
Lefebvre, Henri. 2013. La producción del espacio [1974]. Madrid: Capitán Swing.
Mazurkiewicz, Piotr. 2021. “Religious Freedom in the Time of the Pandemic.” Religions 12 (2): 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020103.
McCallum, Toni and Judi Rose. 2021. “Domestic violence, coercive control and mental health in a pandemic: disenthralling the ecology of domestic.” Health Sociology Review 30 (3): 260–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2021.1987954.
Nyman, Jonna. 2021. “The Everyday Life of Security: Capturing Space, Practice, and Affect.” International Political Sociology 15 (3): 313–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab005.
Ortega y Gasset, José. 2010. El hombe y la gente. Madrid: Alianza.
Orwell, George. 1949. Nineteen Eighty Four. London: Secker & Warburg.
Ritzer, George. 2005. Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption. London: Sage.
Roszak, Piotr & Sasa Horvat. 2022. “Religious Freedom, Cybersecurity, and the Stability of Society: Problems and Perspectives from a European Perspective.” Religions 13 (6): 551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060551.
Ryan, Emma, Ian Warren & Bree Carlton. 2022. “Biopolitics, control and pandemic policing in Victoria, Australia.” Justice, Power and Resistance 5 (1–2): 127–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/ICHL4154.
Sequera, Jorge. 2020. Capitalismo cool, turismo y control del espacio urbano. Madrid: Catarata.
Silva-Torres, Juan José, Luz Martínez Martínez, and Ubaldo Cuesta Cambra. 2022. “Impacto en el consumo de TV en España debido a las restricciones de movilidad por COVID-19 en 2020.” Palabra Clave 25(1): e2515. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2022.25.1.5.
Standing, Guy. 2013. El precariado: una nueva clase social. Barcelona: Pasado y Presente.
Stańdo, Jacek, Gabriela Piechnik-Czyż, Andrzej Adamski, and Żywilla Fechner. 2022. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Interest in Prayer and Spirituality in Poland According to Google Trends Data in the CONTEXT of the Mediatisation of Religion Processes.” Religions 13 (7): 655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070655.
Strauss, Leo. 1959. What Is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies. Illinois: Glencoe.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2002. Democracy in America. Hazleton: Pennsilvania State University.
Wilkinson, Annie. 2020. “Local response in health emergency: key considerations for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal urban settlements.” Environment and Urbanization 32 (2): 503–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820922843.
You, Ji. 2016. “China’s National Security Commission: Theory, Evolution and Operations.” Journal of Contemporary China 25 (98): 178–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1075717.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Miguel Ángel Belmonte
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 597
Number of citations: 0
