Imperium and causality in Thomas Aquinas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2021.013Keywords
practical reason, free will, Thomas Aquinas, AristotleAbstract
Given certain free agent causal models inspired by Tomás de Aquino, it is interesting to look at the causal model presented by Aquinas himself, especially in a text from which the exposition of free action as the effect of the four Aristotelian causal senses. This is the question of the commanded acts (ST I-II, q. 17); in whose first four articles –and in its parallel texts– it determines that the will is an agent cause; practical reason, ordering cause; and the imperium of both (reason and will) is related to the ruling act as the formal with the material.References
Aquino, Tomás de, Corpus Thomisticum, Acceso: enero 9, 2020. http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/. Ed. Enrique Alarcón, Pamplona, 2000.
Argüello, Santiago. 2009. “¿Por qué Tomás de Aquino aventaja a Aristóteles en la disolución del determinismo?” Scripta mediaevalia: revista de pensamiento medieval 2/2: 35-54.
Arguello, Santiago. 2015. “El lenguaje de la causalidad de nuestras acciones: hacia una resignificación del dominus en Tomás de Aquino.” Pensamiento: revista de investigación e información filosófica 71/267: 565-586.
Aristóteles. 2002. Ética a Nicómaco, Madrid: Centro de estudios políticos y constitucionales.
Barret, Nathanael y Sánchez-Cañizares, Javier. 2018. “Causation as the self-determination of a singular and freely chosen optimality” The Review of metaphysics 71: 755-787.
Beroch, María A. 2016. “La expresión `liber est causa sui´ como elemento para una teoría de la subjetividad en Tomás de Aquino.” Espíritu 65/152: 349–369.
Brock, Stephen L. 2002. “Causality and Necessity in Thomas Aquinas.” Quaestio 2: 217-240.
Corso de Estrada, Laura. E. 2014. “Tradiciones helenísticas y medievales sobre la causalidad del obrar humano. Cicerón y Tomás de Aquino ante el alcance de la voluntad.” Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 21: 11–20.
Cuypers, Stefaan E. 2002. “Thomistic Agent-Causalism.” In Mind, metaphysics and value in the Thomistic and Analytical Traditions, edited by John Haldane, 90-108. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Haan, Daniel. 2018. “The Interaction of Noetic and Psychosomatic Operations in a Thomistic Hylomorphic Anthropology.” Scientia et Fides 6/2: 55-83.
Ekstrom, Laura. 2000. Free Will: a philosophical study. Boulder (CO): Westview.
Finnis, John. 1988. Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Orrego C. (trans.) 2000. Ley natural y derechos naturales. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.
Hernán, Miguel. 2019. “Teorías contemporáneas de la causación.” En Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral, editado por Claudia E. Vanney, Ignacio Silva y Juan F. Franck. 1-21. Acceso: enero 9, 2020. http://dia.austral.edu.ar/Teorías_contem¬poráneas_de_la_causación.
Liz, Manuel. 2009. “Sobre nudos y arañas: ¿Cuánta determinación, y de qué tipo, podría llegar a aceptar un compatibilista respecto de la libertad?”, Revista de filosofía 34: 139-154.
Llano, Carlos. 1998. Examen filosófico del acto de la decisión. México: Universidad Panamericana/Publicaciones Cruz.
May, William E. 1970. “Knowledge of Causality in Hume and Aquinas.” The Thomist 34: 254-288.
Mele, Alfred. 1992. The Springs of Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Montoya, Martín. 2016. “La fiabilidad teórica del determinismo. Un examen desde la propuesta de Mariano Artigas”. Scientia et Fides 4:245-282
Moya, Carlos. 2017. El libre albedrío. Un estudio filosófico. Madrid: Cátedra.
Peiró Pérez, Juliana y Zorroza, Idoya. 2014. “La noción de libertad como `causa sui´ en Tomás de Aquino.” Cauriensia 9: 435–449.
Pereda, Rubén. 2016. “La mente del universo y la causalidad.” Scientia et Fides 4: 201-214.
Polo, Leornardo. 1993. Ética: hacia una versión moderna de los temas clásicos. México: U. Panamericana / Publicaciones Cruz.
Sanguineti, Juan J. 2011. “El yo como causa.” Sapientia 66: 23-39.
Sanguineti, Juan J. 2013. “Can the Self Be Considered as a Cause?” In Brains Top Down, edited by Gennaro Auletta, Ivan Collage and Marc Jeannerod, 121-142. Singapore: World Scientific.
Sehon, Scott R. 1994. “Teleology and the Nature of Mental States,” American Philosophical Quarterly 31: 63-72.
Spiering, Jamie A. 2011. “‘Liber est causa sui’: Thomas Aquinas and the Maxim ‘The Free is the Cause of iItself´.” The Review of Metaphysics 65/2: 351-376.
Stump, Eleonore. 1990. “Intellect and Will, and the Principle of Alternate Possibilities”. In Christiam Theism and the Problems of Philosophy, edited by Michel D. Beaty, 254-285. Library of Religious Philosophy, vol. 5, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Vanney, Claudia E. y Franck, Juan F., “Determinismo e indeterminismo,” en Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral, ed. Claudia E. Vanney et al. (2018). Acceso: enero 9, 2020. http://dia.austral.edu.ar/Determinismo_e_indeterminismo.
Warfield, Ted. 2000. “Causal determinism and human freedom are incompatible: a new argument for incompatibilism”. Philosophical Perspectives 14:167-180.
Wiggins, David. 1987. “Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism”. In Needs, Values, Truth. Essays in the Philosophy of Value, 269-302. London: Oxford University Press.
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia et Fides
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 656
Number of citations: 3