Cave 2.0. The dualistic roots of transhumanism
Keywords
transhumanism, dualism, naturalism, existencialism, common senseAbstract
Transhumanism (TH) is an intellectual trend that promotes the technological transformation of human beings. We will briefly expose the most conspicuous features of the TH, as well as the main criticisms that have been made to it (section 1). The aim of this article, however, is not to enter into this controversy, so we will provide only the essential keys to be able to move forward. And one of the most intriguing keys of the TH is that, beneath its techno-futurist patina, it refers to certain philosophical ideas as old as incompatible –in appearance– with each other. The TH refers to radical naturalism, as well as to existentialist nihilism. The thesis advocated here is that both, radical naturalism and existentialist nihilism, are products of the various waves of dualism. Once we separate, in the dualistic way, freedom on the one hand and nature on the other, we can count up to two, as the dualists do, or remain just in one, as existentialists do, who stand in freedom, and naturalists as well, who only count on nature. In any case, the image of the human being, which is freedom and nature (without “and”), is damaged. Then the aporetic and sickly animal appears, which has to be saved... from itself. How? Following the Procrustean method, but now with the bio and info prefixes instead of saw and hammer, until the poor human being fits into the utopian bed that some visionaries have dreamed (section 2). But there could be perhaps a way to improve human life without forcing the human scale. In order to draw this way between the radical naturalism, that mutilates, and the existentialist nihilism, that dislodges and stretches, we should deny in advance the dualism that generates both, and follow the common sense, in line with the Aristotelian tradition, rather than utopian daydreams (section 3). In our opinion, the Aristotelian concept of human nature enables us to judge anthropotechnics better than the normativity extracted from the futuristic visions of the TH (section 4).
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 2003. Homo sacer. El poder soberano y la nuda vida. Valencia: Pretextos.
Aristóteles. 2018. Obra biológica. Oviedo: KRK. Traducción de los tratados De partibus animalium, De motu animalium y De Incessu Animalium, por Rosana Bartolomé, con introducción y notas de Alfredo Marcos.
Asla, Mariano. 2018. “El transhumanismo como ideología: ambigüedades y dificultades de la fe en el progreso.” Scio, 15: 63-96.
Beorlegui, Carlos. 2019. Humanos. Entre lo prehumano y lo pos- o transhumano. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia de Comillas y San Terrae.
Bertolaso, Marta. 2010. “Super-naturali come vampiri: L’Enhancement in medicina.” En La medicina dei nuovi vampiri, editado por C. Cullen, 101-115. Milán: Academia Universa Press.
Bunge, Mario. 1981. “Biopopulations, not Biospecies, Are Individuals and Evolve.” The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 4: 284-285.
Diéguez, Antonio. 2012. La vida bajo escrutinio. Una introducción a la filosofía de la biología, Barcelona: Biblioteca Buridán.
Diéguez, Antonio. 2017. Transhumanismo. La búsqueda tecnológica del mejoramiento humano. Barcelona: Herder.
Dublin, Max. 1992. Futurehype: The Tyranny of Prophecy. New York: Penguin.
Feyerabend, Paul. 2001. La conquista de la abundancia. La abstracción frente a la riqueza del ser. Barcelona: Paidós.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. El fin del hombre: consecuencias de la revolución biotecnológica. Barcelona: Ediciones B.
Fuller, Steve y Lipinska, Veronika. 2014. The proactionary imperative. A foundation for transhumanism. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giner, Illana. 2005. Introducción a Poder o impotencia de la subjetividad, de Hans Jonas, 13-70. Barcelona: Paidós.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2002. El futuro de la naturaleza humana. ¿Hacia una eugenesia liberal? Barcelona: Paidós.
Jonas, Hans. 1995. El principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Barcelona: Herder.
Jonas, Hans. 2000: La religión gnóstica. Madrid: Siruela.
Jonas, Hans. 2000a. El principio vida. Madrid: Trotta.
Jonas, Hans. 2001. The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity. Boston: Beacon Press.
Jonas, Hans. 2001a. Más cerca del perverso fin. Madrid: Libros de la Catarata.
Jonas, Hans. 2005. Poder o impotencia de la subjetividad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Edición de Pedro M. Rosario Barbosa. San Juan de Puerto Rico. http://pmrb.net/books/kantfund/fund_metaf_costumbres_vD.pdf.
Kass, Leon. 2002. Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Kurzweil, Raymond. 2012. La singularidad está cerca. Cuando los humanos transcendamos la biología. Berlín: Lola Books.
Marcos, Alfredo. 2010. “Filosofía de la naturaleza humana.” Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía, 6: 181-208 [disponible en http://revistadefilosofia.com/35-10.pdf/ Consultado el 19/03/2018].
Marcos, Alfredo. 2012. Postmodern Aristotle. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Marcos, Alfredo. 2016. “La bioética ante las nuevas antropotecnias.” Bioethics UPdate, 2: 102-114.
Marcos, Alfredo. 2016a. “Especie.” En Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral editado por Vanney, C., Silva, I, y Franck, J. URL=http://dia.austral.edu.ar/Especie. Consultado el 19/03/2018.
Marcos, Alfredo. 2017. “Antropotecnias y naturaleza humana.” En Técnica y ser humano, editado por Sanmartín, José y Gutiérrez, Raúl, 101-130. Ciudad de México: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano.
Marcos, Alfredo y Chillón, José. (2015). “Técnica y sentido.” Scio. Revista de Filosofía, 11: 77-100.
Marcos, Alfredo y Pérez, Moisés. 2018. Meditación de la naturaleza humana. Madrid: BAC.
More, Max. 2010. Transhumanist FAQ, URL=http://www.extropy.org/resources.htm/. Consultado el 19/03/2018.
Negro, Dalmacio. 2009. El mito del hombre nuevo. Madrid: Encuentro.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2004. Así habló Zaratustra. Madrid: Alianza.
Ortega y Gasset, José. 1939. Meditación de la técnica, URL=https://francescllorens.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/ortega_meditacion_tecnica.pdf/. Consultado el 19/03/2018.
Ortega y Gasset, José. 2004-2010. La España invertebrada, en Obras completas de José Ortega y Gasset, vol. III. Madrid: Taurus.
Ortega y Gasset, José. 2004-2010. Historia como sistema, en Obras completas de José Ortega y Gasset, vol. VI. Madrid: Taurus.
Pelayo, Francisco. 2009. “Debatiendo sobre Darwin en España: antidarwinismo, teorías evolucionistas alternativas y síntesis moderna.” Asclepio, 61: 101-128.
Popper, Karl. 1957. The poverty of Historicism. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Postigo, Elena. 2009. “Transhumanesimo e posthumano: Principi teorici e implicazioni bioetiche.” Medicina e Morale 2: 267-82.
Sádaba, Igor. 2009. Cyborg. Sueños y pesadillas de las tecnologías. Barcelona: Península.
Sanmartín, Javier. 2018. “Crítica de la razón cruel: breve análisis de los riesgos de una tecnología sin humanismo.” Scio. Revista de Filosofía 15: 29-61.
Sandel, Michael. 2007. Contra la perfección. La ética en la era de la ingeniería genética. Barcelona: Marbot.
Savulescu, Julian y Bostrom, Nick, eds. 2009. Human Enhancement. Oxford: OUP.
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2001. Extrañamiento del mundo. Valencia: Pretextos.
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2003. Normas para el parque humano. Madrid: Siruela.
Ursúa, Nicanor. 2010. “¿Tendrá la ‘Convergencia de Tecnologías’ (CT) y la ‘Mejora Técnica del Ser Humano’ un impacto similar al darwinismo? Implicaciones y consideraciones filosóficas.” Endoxa, 24: 311-329.
World Transhumanist Association. 2010. “The transhumanist FAQ.” Consultado el 19/03/2018. URL= https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-faq/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 966
Number of citations: 2