La crítica de Juan de santo Tomás del concepto suareciano de materia prima

Authors

  • Leopoldo José Prieto López Departamento de Humanidades, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Madrid; Ctra. M-515 Pozuelo-Majadahonda Km 1.800, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0990-6445

Keywords

Poinsot, materia prima, quantity, material substance

Abstract

The John of Saint Thomas' critique of the suarecian concept of the prime matter

The figure of Juan Poinsot (Juan de Santo Tomás, Joannis a Santo Thoma) is inserted in the movement of return to a Thomism free of nominalist adherences promoted in the Hispanic Thomism by relevant figures of the order of preachers. In this sense must be understood the Poinsot’s critique of some ideas of Scotistic and Ockhamistic origin, present in the metaphysics of Suarez, referred to the ontological status of the material substance, such as: the actuality of matter, the substantial mode of union, the immediate inhesion of the quantity in matter and the idea of entitative extension (extensio entitativa).


References

AA.VV. 1609. Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Jesu in octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Stagyritæ. Coloniae: sumptibus Lazari Zetzneri.

AA.VV. 1600. Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Jesu in duos libros De Generatione et corruptione Aristotelis Stagyritae. Ludguni: sumptibus Ioannis Baptistae Buysson 1600.

Åkerlund, Erik. 2015. “Material Causality. Dissolving a Paradox: The Actuality of Prime Matter in Suárez”. En Suárez on Aristotelian Causality, edited by Jakob L. Fink, 43-63. Leiden: Brill.

A Sancto Thoma, Joannes. 1931. Cursus theologicus, opera et studio monachorum quorumdam solesmensium O.S.B. editus in quo quid contineatur versa pagella indicabit, vol I. Parisiis: Typis Societatis S. Joannis Evangelistae Desclée et Sociorum.

A Sancto Thoma, Joannes. 1678. Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus. Ludguni: sumptibus Laurentii Arnaud, Petri Borde, Joannis et Petri Arnaud. Para corregir algunos defectos visuales de la edición de 1678, hemos empleado también Poinsot, João. 1948-1950. Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus. 3 Bände. Nova editio a P. Beato Reiser OSB. Taurini: Marietti. Reprint 2007. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. Todos los textos empleados del Cursus, aún sin traducir al español, que se presentan aquí son de traducción propia.

Beltrán de Heredia, Vicente. 1963. “Domingo Báñez (1528-1604)”. En “Enciclopedia de la Cultura Española”, vol. I, editada por Florentino Pérez-Embid, 669-671. Madrid: Editora Nacional.

Cross, Richard. 1998. The Physics of Duns Scotus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Descartes, René. 1996. Principia philosophiae. En Œuvres complètes de R. Descartes, vol. VIII., editadas por Charles Adam y Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin.

Forlivesi, Marco. 2001. Le edizioni del ‘Cursus theologicus’ di João Poinsot (1589-1644) [http:// web.tiscali.it/ marcoforlivesi/ mf2001e.pdf], 1-26. Accesso el 3 de enero de 2018.

Gomes, Pinharanda. 1985. Joao de santo Tomas na filosofía do Seculo XVII. Lisboa: Ministerio da Educação.

Gonçalves, António M. 1955. “Actualidade de Frei Joao de santo Tomas”. Filosofia 5: 45-51.

Heider, Daniel. 2008. “Suárez on Material Substance: Reification of Intrinsic Principles and the Unity of Material Composites”. Organon F 15/4: 423-438.

Prieto López, Leopoldo J. 2006. “Suárez, crocevia nella filosofía tra Medievo e Modernità”. Alpha Omega IX/1: 3-38.

Prieto López, Leopoldo J. 2017. “La impronta escotista en la metafísica de Suárez”. Logos: Anales del seminario de metafísica 50: 207-227

Ramírez, Santiago. 1924. “Jean de saint-Thomas”. En Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique, vol. VIII/1, editado por Alfred Vacant, Eugene Mangenot y Emile Amann. Paris: Letouzey et Ané.

Rivera de Ventosa, Enrique. 1982. “Significación de Juan de santo Tomás en la historia del pensamiento”. Revista portuguesa de filosofía 38: 581-592.

Suárez, Francisco. 1960-1966. Disputaciones metafísicas (DM). 7 vols. Madrid: Gredos.

Suárez, Francisco. 1964. Disputaciones metafísicas. Vol. 6. Madrid: Gredos.

Suárez, Francisco. 1960. Disputaciones metafísicas. Vol. 2. Madrid: Gredos.

Ward, Thomas M. 2014. John Duns Scotus on Parts, Wholes and Hylepmorphism. Leiden: Brill.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

Published

2018-02-10

How to Cite

1.
PRIETO LÓPEZ, Leopoldo José. La crítica de Juan de santo Tomás del concepto suareciano de materia prima. Scientia et Fides. Online. 10 February 2018. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 263-284. [Accessed 1 July 2025].

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 725
Number of citations: 1