Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science

Authors

Keywords

creation-science, falsifiability, philosophy as bridge, scientism

Abstract

This article highlights certain recurring themes in Mariano Artigas’s works by examining a judicial decision made in the United States in 1982 concerning the teaching of “creation-science” alongside “evolution-science” in public schools. These themes include: the proper delimitation of the boundaries of science, the importance of philosophy as a bridge between science and religion, and the misunderstandings concerning the limits of science inherent in scientism.

References

Artigas, M. 2000. The Mind of the Universe. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

Artigas, M. 2006. Knowing Things for Sure. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Artigas, M. 2007. Oracles of Science: Celebrity Scientists versus God and Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Brooke, J. H. 1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dawkins, R. 2003. “You can’t have it both ways. Irreconcilable Differences?”. In Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?, edited by P. Kurtz, 205–209. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Darwin, C. 1964. The Origin of the Species. New York: Mentor Books.

“Deposition of Dr. Stephen Jay Gould.” 1981. Accessed Sept. 16, 2016. http://www.antievolution.org/projects/mclean/new_site/depos/pf_gould_dep.htm

Harrison, P. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Leo XIII, Pope. 1893. Providentissimus Deus. Accessed Jan. 19, 2016. http://w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_18111893_providentissimus-deus.html

Limberg, D. C. and Numbers, R. L., eds. 1986. God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Overton, W. R. 1982. “Creationism in Schools: The Decision in McLean versus the Arkansas Board of Education.” Science 215/4535: 934–943.

Popper, K. 1987. “Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind.” In Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by G. Radnitzky and W. W. Bartley, 139–155. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Popper, K. 1993. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. London: Routledge.

Russell, C. A. 2002. “The Conflict of Science and Religion.” In Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction, edited by G. B. Ferngren, 3–12. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Shermer, M. 2004. “Mustangs, Monists and Meaning.” Scientific American 291/3:38.

Stamos, D. N. 1996. “Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology.” Biology and Philosophy 11:161–191.

Stanley, M. 2014. Huxley’s Church and Maxwell’s Demon: From Theistic Science to Naturalistic Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wilson, D. B. 2002. “The Historiography of Science and Religion.” In Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction, edited by G. B. Ferngren, 13–29. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

Published

2016-12-19

How to Cite

1.
GEORGE, Marie. Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science. Scientia et Fides. Online. 19 December 2016. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 397-415. [Accessed 10 October 2024].

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): 10th anniversary of Mariano Artigas' death

Section

Articles: Temas relacionados con los intereses de Mariano Artigas

License

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 464
Number of citations: 0