Fundamental Physics and Middle-Sized Dry Goods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2025.015Keywords
reductionism, physicalism, emergence, microphysics, quantum mechanicsAbstract
I consider the debate between those who believe in microphysical reductionism, and those who believe in the irreducibility of macroscopic objects. I consider, in particular, recent arguments that physics itself refutes the hypothesis of reductionism – from, among others, George Ellis and Barbara Drossel. I raise some questions about the effectiveness of these arguments, and I suggest that this debate is based on an unclear, but emotionally fraught, understanding of what “reduction” means.
References
Atherton, Margaret. 2022. “Berkeley and Newton.” In The Oxford Hand-book of Berkeley, edited by Samuel C. Rickless, 237–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190873417.013.16.
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford.
Bealer, George. 1978. “An inconsistency in functionalism.” Synthese 38 (3): 333–72.
Chalmers, David J., and Kelvin J. McQueen. 2022. “Consciousness and the collapse of the wavefunction.” In Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics, edited by Shan Gao, 11–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drossel, Barbara, and George Ellis. 2018. “Contextual wavefunction collapse: an integrated theory of quantum measurement.” New Journal of Physics 20 (11): 113025.
Drossel, Barbara. 2017. “Ten reasons why a thermalized system cannot be described by a many-particle wave function.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 58: 12–21.
Fine, Kit. 2005. “Tense and reality.” In Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, 261–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199278709.003.0009.
Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glick, David. 2021. “QBism and the limits of scientific realism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2): 53. Halvorson, Hans. 2011. “The measure of all things: Quantum mechanics and the soul.” In: The soul hypothesis: Investigations into the existence of the soul, edited by Mark C. Baker, Stewart Goetz, 138–63. New York: Continuum Press.
Hill, Benjamin, Henrik Lagerlund, and Stathis Psillos. 2021. Reconsidering Causal Powers: Historical and Conceptual Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Koons, Robert. 2014. “Staunch vs. faint-hearted hylomorphism: Toward an Aristotelian account of composition.” Res Philosophica 91 (2): 151–77.
Koons, Robert. 2024. “Contextual emergence, traveling forms, and cosmic substances: Evaluating the options for quantum hylomorphism.” Unpublished manuscript. McDonough, Jeffrey K. 2009. “Leibniz on natural teleology and the laws of optics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (3): 505–44.
Pruss, Alexander R (2018). “A traveling forms interpretation of quantum mechanics.” In Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science edited by William Simpson, Robert Koons, and Nicholas Teh, 105–122. London: Routledge.
Simpson, William M. R. 2021. “Cosmic hylomorphism: A powerist ontology of quantum mechanics.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1): 1–25.
Simpson, William M. R. 2022. “From quantum physics to classical metaphysics.” In Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature, edited by William Simpson, Koons Robert, & James Orr, 21–65. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Simpson, William M. R. 2023. Hylomorphism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solomon, Monica. 2022. “Berkeley and Newton.” The Oxford Hand-book of Berkeley, edited by Samuel C. Rickless, 482–502. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190873417.013.27.
Wallace, David. 2012. The emergent multiverse: Quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Neil E. 2019. The Powers Metaphysic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hans Halvorson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 155
Number of citations: 0
