Potentiality-Possibility: Metaphysics and Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2024.023Keywords
Contingency, Necessity, Probability, Potence, Quantum mechanics, Duns Scotus, Methaphysics of scienceAbstract
In this paper, we address the metaphysical question of physical potentiality and its relation to metaphysical potentiality as a question that helps us understand the task of metaphysics in science. To this end, we pose three questions. One concerns the relation between necessity and contingency, which has various logical and natural ramifications, philosophically pours into the view of a phenomenal or real-world and concomitantly to the intersection between the rational and the empirical approach. A second one will address the solution to this necessity-contingency intersection through the calculus of probabilities and its evolution towards probability or quantum potentiality. The third question will focus on the medieval metaphysical roots of quantum physics, especially the modal metaphysics of John Duns Scotus.
References
Armstrong, David M. 1983. “Are the Laws of Nature Necessary or Contingent?” Capítulo. En What Is a Law of Nature?, 158–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aristóteles. 1982. Metafísica. 2ª Edición. Madrid: Gredos.
Balan, Roger. 2005. “L’Étrangeté du monde quantique.” La jaune & la rouge n. 604. https://www.lajauneetlarouge.com/letrangete-du-monde-quantique/
Bird, Alexander. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bigelow, John, y Robert Pargetter. 1991. “Mathematics in Science.” En Science and Necessity, 346–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briggs, John S. 2021. “Quantum or Classical Perception of Atomic Motion.” En Molecular Beams in Physics and Chemistry, editado por B. Friedrich, y H. Schmidt-Böcking, 195–221. Berlin: Springer.
Conway, John y Simon Kochen. 2006. “Theorem of Free-Will.” Foundations of Physics 36: 1441–73.
De Finetti, B. 1931. “Probabilismo. Saggio critico sulla teoria delle probabilità e sul valore della scienza.” Logos 14: 163–219.
Dieudonne Jean. 1987. Pour l’honneur de l’esprit humain. Les mathématiques aujourd’hui. Paris: Hachette.
Dumas, M. 1948. “L’introduction des probabilités dans les sciences concrètes.” Journal de la société statistique de Paris 89: 435–43.
Escoto, Juan Duns. 1954. Opera omnia. Vol. 3, editado por C. Balić, et al. Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis. [Ordinatio I, dist. 3.]
Escoto, Juan Duns. 1966. Opera omnia. Vol. 17, editado por C. Balić, et al. Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis. [Lectura I, dist. 8–45.]
Escoto, Juan Duns. 1973. Opera omnia. Vol. 7, editado por C. Balić, et al. Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis. [Ordinatio II, dist. 1–3.]
Escoto, Juan Duns. 1997. Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis, Libri I–V, editado por G. Etzkorn, et al. Opera Philosophica 3. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: The Franciscan Institute.
Escoto, Juan Duns. 2008.The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture: Reportatio I–A, Texto latino y traducción al ingles. Vol. 2. Traducido y editado por Allan B.
Wolter y Oleg V. Bychkov. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Franciscan Institute. [Distinciones 22–48.]
Feynman, Richard. 1965. The Character of Physical Laws. London: Modern Library.
Galavotti, Maria Carla. 2011. “On Hans Reichenbach’s Inductivism.” Synthese 181(1): 95–111.
Georges, Antoine. 2010. “De l’atome au matériau. Les phénomènes quantiques collectifs: Chaire de Physique de la matière condensée. Leçon inaugurale prononcée le jeudi 8 octobre 2009.” En: De l’atome au matériau. Les phénomènes quantiques collectifs. From the atom to matter. Collective quantum phenomena. Paris: Collège de France, Fayard, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cdf.337.
Girle, Rod. 2003. Possible Worlds. Routledge Huoranszki, Ferenc. 2019. “The Contingency of Physical Laws.” Principia 23: 487–502.
Kielkopf, Charles F. 1978. “Duns Scotus’s Rejection of ‘Necessarily Exists’ as a Predicate.” Journal of History of Philosophy 16(1): 13–21.
Kneale, William. 1949. Probability and Induction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Knuuttila, Simo. 1981. “Time and Modality in Scholasticism.” En Reforging the Great Chain of Being. Studies of the History of Modal Theories, editado por Simo Knuuttila, 163–257. Dordrecht–Boston: Reidel.
Kripke, Saul A. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Langford, Cooper H. 1930. “Otherness and Dissimilarity.” Mind 39: 454–61.
Largeault, Jean. 1989. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 94(30): 419–21.
Lewis, David K. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwel.
Llamas, Vicente. 2020. “Eidos e Identitas indiscernibilium en mecánica cuántica.” Scientia et Fides 8(1): 141–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2020.007.
Llamas, Vicente. 2022. “De univocatione entis revisión basal de una ontología dinamicista.” Cauriensia 17: 213–42.
Lowe. Edward Jonathan. 1998. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity and Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Penrose, Roger. 2004. The road to Reality. A complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. London: Jonathan Cape.
Putallaz, François-Xavier. 2001. “Introduction.” En Duns Scot, John. 1307–1308. Tractatus de Primo Principio0 – Traité du premier principe, traducción de J. D. Caglioli, J. M. Meilland y F. X. Putallaz, dirigido por R. Imbach). Paris: Vrin.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1932. Über Indeterminismus in der Physik. Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.
Tiercelin, Claudine. 2016. “La métaphysique et les sciences. Les nouveaux enjeux.” Lato Sensu: Revue de la société de philosophie des sciences 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20416/lsrsps.v3i1.583.
Tiercelin, Claudine. 2011. Le Ciment des choses. Paris: Ithaque.
Valentini Antony y Hans Westman. 2005. “Dynamical origin of quantum probabilities.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Phisical and Engineering Sciences 461: 253–72.
Vernant, Denis. 1998. “Sign conceptions in logic from the 19th century to the present.” En 2. Teilband: Ein Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur, editado por Roland Posner, Klaus Robering y Thomas A. Sebeok, 1483–1511. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Wigner, Eugene P. 1960. “The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Richard courant lecture in mathematical sciences delivered at New York University, May 11, 1959.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13: 1–14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Manuel Lázaro Pulido, Esteban Anchústegui Igartua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 94
Number of citations: 0
