On the possibility of mind-reading or the external control of behavior: Contribution of Aquinas to the Neurorights discussion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.017Keywords
neurorights, mind reading, privacy, intimacy, manipulation, free will, Aquinas, angelic knowledge, neuroscience, separate substancesAbstract
Thomas Aquinas holds that the actual content of our thought is not accessible for any creature, and that free will cannot be superseded. These theses are founded on the spiritual condition of our intelligence and will, which makes them directly invulnerable to any intervention on our body. On the other hand, he enthrones the will as the keeper of interiority: it precludes a full transparency that would make our free decision to communicate superfluous, and it exert an inalienable control over the action through which we direct ourselves to the good. In this sense, Aquinas departs from reductionist accounts, which either refuse the existence of free will, suppressing the reason to protect its expression, or face the difficulty of explaining the meaning and justification of the rights that are claimed for free will. However, Thomas Aquinas admits the possibility of indirectly accessing our minds through the knowledge of brain states and of influencing our will through passions by means of alterations of our organisms. Although this possibility was not within the reach of the human being in his time, he considered it was within the reach of separated substances. The consideration of the limits of their perspicacity and control sheds light on the possibilities that neurotechnology can allow in the future. The existence of an unassailable stronghold that guarantees our interiority and free will legitimates our right to be respected but does not make their protection superfluous.
References
Blanco, Carlos. 2006. Historia de la neurociencia. El conocimiento del cerebro y la mente desde una perspectiva interdisciplinar. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva (Madrid 2014).
Bonino, Serge-Thomas. 2007. Les anges el les démons: quatorce leçons de théologie catholique. Paris: Parole et Silence.
Bublitz, J. C. 2022. “Novel Neurorights: From Nonsense to Substance.” Neuroethics 15 (7): 1–15.
Carreño, Juan Eduardo. 2019. “Can a Poet Talk with Angels? An Answer from Medieval Angelology.” Religion & Literature, vol. 52, no. 1: 196–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rel.2019.0044.
Cobb, Matthew. 2020. “Computer.” En The Idea of the Brain. A History. London: Profile Books.
Cobb, Matthew. 2020. “The Heart.” En The Idea of the Brain. A History. London: Profile Books.
Cyranoski, David. Neuroscience. 2012 “The mind reader.” Nature 486: 178–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/486178a.
De Haan, Daniel. 2018. “The Interaction of Noetic and Psychosomatic Operations in a Thomist Hylomorphic Anthropology.” Scientia et Fides 6 (2): 55–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2018.010.
García-Valdecasas, Miguel. 2005. “Psychology and mind in Aquinas.” History of Psychiatry 16 (3): 291–310.
García-López, Eric, Muñoz, Jose. M., Andorno, Roberto. 2021. “Editorial: Neurorights and Mental Freedom: Emerging Challenges to Debates on Human Dignity and Neurotechnologies.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 2021.
Goering, Sara, Klein, Eran, Specker Sullivan, Laura et al. 2021. “Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.” Neuroethics. 14 (3): 365–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6.
Hochberg, Leigh, Bacher, Daniel, Jarosiewicz, Beata. et al. 2012. “Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm.” Nature 485: 372–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11076.
Horgan, John. 2005. “The Forgotten Era of Brain Chips.” Scientific American. 293 (4): 66–73.
Herrera-Ferrá, Karen, Muñoz, Jose M., Nicolini, Humberto, Saruwatari Zavala, Garbine, Martínez Bullé Goyri, Victor Manuel. 2022. “Contextual and Cultural Perspectives on Neurorights: Reflections Toward an International Consensus.” AJOB Neuroscience. Mar 27: 1–9.
Ienca, Marcello. 2021. “On neurorights.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Artículo 701258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.701258.
Lima, Susana Q., Miesenböck, Gero. 2005. Remote control of behavior through genetically targeted photostimulation of neurons. Cell. Apr 8; 121 (1): 141–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.004. PMID: 15820685.
Muñoz, Jose. M. 2021. “Optogenética para recuperar la visión: grandes esperanzas llenas de cautela”. 28 de mayo. https://www.agenciasinc.es/Opinion/Optogenetica-para-recuperar-la-vision-grandes-esperanzas-llenas-de-cautela.
Muñoz, Jose. M. 2020. “Neurotecnologías, control mental y derechos humanos.” En El dominio mental, by Pedro Baños, 483–495. Barcelona: Ariel.
Murillo, Jose Ignacio, 2018. “Conocimiento, autoconocimiento y condición corpórea del ser humano”. En Enrique Alarcón, Agustín Echevarría, Miguel García-Valdecasas, Rubén Pereda (eds.). Opere et veritate. Homenaje al profesor Ángel Luis González. Pamplona: Eunsa.
Murillo, J. I. 1998. Operación, hábito y reflexión. El conocimiento como clave antropológica en Tomás de Aquino. Pamplona: Eunsa.
Murillo, Jose, Ignacio, Giménez-Amaya, Jose Manuel. 2008. “Tiempo, conciencia y libertad: consideraciones en torno a los experimentos de B. Libet y colaboradores.” Acta Philosophica II, 17: 291–306.
Sahel, Jose Alain., Boulanger-Scemama, Elise., Pagot, Chloe. et al. 2021. “Partial recovery of visual function in a blind patient after optogenetic therapy.” Nature Medicine 27, 1223–1229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01351-4.
Sánchez-Cañizares, Javier. 2022. “Inmaterial knowledge as ultimate emergence.”. European Journal of Science and Theology, Decembre, 18 (6): 113–128.
Sancti Thomae De Aquino Opera Omnia (recognovit et instruxit Enrique Alarcón automato electrónico Pompaelone ad Universitatis Studiorum Navarrensis aedes MM A. D. https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html
The Brain Initiative. 2023. Visitado el 8 de mayo de 2023. https://braininitiative.nih.gov
The Neurorights Foundation 2023. Visitado el 8 de mayo de 2023. https://neurorightsfoundation.org/mission
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jose Ignacio Murillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 667
Number of citations: 0