Lockdown, Social Control of Space and Religious Freedom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.008Keywords
social control, space, social distancing, pandemic, new social waysAbstract
Political thought, from Aristotle to Lefebvre, has placed importance on the control of space as an activity of political power. Extraordinary measures taken by global policy-makers since the early 2020s as part of efforts to to combat the pandemic have included mass lock-downs, closed borders, social distancing and other forms of spatial control. Importantly, spaces dedicated to religious worship (churches, etc.) were subjected to extraordinary regulation. In the exercise of this new control of space, social control has played an important role (obligation to declare one’s health condition, incitement to denounce offenders...) fostered by the authorities through various means of new social education, generating new social habits in terms of the management of space. Religious freedom and the autonomy of the Church thus faced new challenges as a result of the extraordinary control of religious space by civil power and the pressure of social control. The new forms of control incorporated into our habits deserve to be critically reviewed in our search for true spaces of freedom that are not sacrificed in the name of supposed science.
References
Abbate, Stefano. 2021. “Capital y Estado: fronteras de la precariedad en la posmodernidad.” In Posmodernidad y control social, edited by Miguel Ángel Belmonte, 63–88. Barcelona: Tirant.
Amoore, Louise. 2009. “Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror.” Antipode 41 (1): 49–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x.
Aristotle. 1944. Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Auge, Marc. 1992. Non-lieux, introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris: Seuil.
Blicharz, Grzegorz, Maria Alejandra Vanney & Piotr Roszak (eds). 2020. The Battle for Religious Freedom: Jurisprudence and Axiology. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IWS.
Boden, Deirdre & Harvey L. Molotch. 1994. “The Compulsion of Proximity.” In Space, Time and Modernity, edited by Roger Friedland and Deirdre Boden, 257–286. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cortina, Adela. 2020. Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Barcelona: Paidos.
Darsie, Camilo & Douglas Luís Weber. 2020. “Disease and space control: issues about dispersion and isolation in pandemic times?” Journal of Infection Control 9(2): 47–48.
Fitz-Gibbon, Kate & Silke Meyer. 2020. “Coronavirus: Fear of family violence spike as COVID-19 impact hits households.” Monash Lens. Retrieved from https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2020/03/18/1379841/coronavirus-fear-of-family-violence-spikeas-covid-19-impact-hits-households
Florida, Richard. 2010. La clase creativa: la transformación de la cultura del trabajo y el ocio en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Paidos.
Guo, Xuezhi. 2012. China’s Security State: Philosophy, Evolution, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huzarek, Tomasz. 2021. “The Theological Sources of Human Identity.” European Journal of Science and Theology 17 (6): 29–38. http://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/91/3_Huzarek.pdf
Jung, Hoyoon. 2021. “State within a state: Gang-enforced lockdowns in Rio’s favelas amid the COVID-19 pandemic and its sociopolitical implications in Brazil.” International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies 19 (2): 9–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0055/CGP/v19i02/9-18.
Lefebvre, Henri. 2013. La producción del espacio [1974]. Madrid: Capitán Swing.
Mazurkiewicz, Piotr. 2021. “Religious Freedom in the Time of the Pandemic.” Religions 12 (2): 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020103.
McCallum, Toni and Judi Rose. 2021. “Domestic violence, coercive control and mental health in a pandemic: disenthralling the ecology of domestic.” Health Sociology Review 30 (3): 260–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2021.1987954.
Nyman, Jonna. 2021. “The Everyday Life of Security: Capturing Space, Practice, and Affect.” International Political Sociology 15 (3): 313–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab005.
Ortega y Gasset, José. 2010. El hombe y la gente. Madrid: Alianza.
Orwell, George. 1949. Nineteen Eighty Four. London: Secker & Warburg.
Ritzer, George. 2005. Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption. London: Sage.
Roszak, Piotr & Sasa Horvat. 2022. “Religious Freedom, Cybersecurity, and the Stability of Society: Problems and Perspectives from a European Perspective.” Religions 13 (6): 551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060551.
Ryan, Emma, Ian Warren & Bree Carlton. 2022. “Biopolitics, control and pandemic policing in Victoria, Australia.” Justice, Power and Resistance 5 (1–2): 127–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/ICHL4154.
Sequera, Jorge. 2020. Capitalismo cool, turismo y control del espacio urbano. Madrid: Catarata.
Silva-Torres, Juan José, Luz Martínez Martínez, and Ubaldo Cuesta Cambra. 2022. “Impacto en el consumo de TV en España debido a las restricciones de movilidad por COVID-19 en 2020.” Palabra Clave 25(1): e2515. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2022.25.1.5.
Standing, Guy. 2013. El precariado: una nueva clase social. Barcelona: Pasado y Presente.
Stańdo, Jacek, Gabriela Piechnik-Czyż, Andrzej Adamski, and Żywilla Fechner. 2022. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Interest in Prayer and Spirituality in Poland According to Google Trends Data in the CONTEXT of the Mediatisation of Religion Processes.” Religions 13 (7): 655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070655.
Strauss, Leo. 1959. What Is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies. Illinois: Glencoe.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2002. Democracy in America. Hazleton: Pennsilvania State University.
Wilkinson, Annie. 2020. “Local response in health emergency: key considerations for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal urban settlements.” Environment and Urbanization 32 (2): 503–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820922843.
You, Ji. 2016. “China’s National Security Commission: Theory, Evolution and Operations.” Journal of Contemporary China 25 (98): 178–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1075717.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Miguel Ángel Belmonte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 597
Number of citations: 0