Can the justification of the bill create law? Comments on the article 165a § 4 of the Polish Penal Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2020.015Keywords
criminal law, penal code, financing of terrorism, criminal sanction, penaltyAbstract
This article undertakes a discussion around the controversial formulation of the penalty of the article 165a § 4 of the polish Penal Code. The dispute oscillates around the fragment “is liable to the same punishment”, which leads to two contradictory interpretations of the punishment. This problem has not yet been noticed by the literature. The text is divided into seven main parts. The first two of them are a brief introduction to this subject. The third is a short literature review. The fourth and fifth parts present opposite arguments on this penalty. The sixth contains the results of surveys that confirm these controversies. The last one is a short summary.
References
Burzyński P., Ustawowe określenie sankcji karnej, Warszawa 2008.
Gardocki L. (red.), System prawa karnego. Tom 8, 2018, Legalis.
Grześkowiak A., Wiak K. (red.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2018.
Królikowski M., Zawłocki R. (red.), Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Tom I. Komentarz. Art. 117–221, Warszawa 2017.
Królikowski M., Zawłocki R. (red.), Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Tom II. Komentarz. Art. 222–316, Warszawa 2017.
Mozgawa M. (red.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz aktualizowany, 2019, LEX.
Mozgawa M. (red.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2019.
Stefański R. A. (red.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2018.
Wróbel W., Zoll A. (red.), Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Tom II. Część I. Komentarz do art. 117–211a, 2017, LEX.
Żółtek S., Znaczenie normatywne ustawowych znamion typu czynu zabronionego, LEX 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 661
Number of citations: 0