Wpływ powołania Europejskiej Wspólnoty Węgla i Stali na zakres władzy państwa członkowskiego. Analiza prawno-historyczna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2013.019Keywords
the Coal and Steel Community, the Treaty of Paris (18 April 1951), the member-state, competence, powersAbstract
The paper deals with one of the most significant issues of international organization, i.e. distribution of power between it and its member-states. The European Coal and Steel Community was set up as the first of the three Communities. Its Treaty and practice became a source of precious experience for drafters of the Rome Treaties. This referred especially to the above-mentioned problem of distribution of power and division of competences. The issue is analyzed in three aspects: duties and tasks imposed by the member-states upon them, powers relinquished by them, and eventually competences conferred upon the Community. The conclusion reads as follows: the first Community wasn’t bestowed with a vast competence over coal and steel sector but with a set of and precisely described powers relating to a number of determined matters within the sector. The largest amount of the lost powers wasn’t transferred to the Community but renounced by the member-states which henceforth weren’t allowed to exercise them independently. Thereby, even in the language of politics of the mid-twentieth century, the Community did not gain and enjoyed any “sovereignty” by the virtue of the Treaty.
References
Bebr G., Labour under the Schuman Plan, „Minnesota Law Review” 1954, z. 7.
Bebr G., The ECSC – A Political and Legal Innovation, „The Yale Law Journal” 1953, z. 1.
Bernstein M., Labor and the European Communities, „Law and Contemporary Problems” 1961, z. 3.
Całus A., Rechtspersonlichkeit der Europaischen Gemeinschaften, Saarbrucken 1960.
Communautes europeennes, w: Les aspects juridiques de l’integration economique, Constantinesco V., Competences et pouvoirs dans les Communautes europeennes, Paris 1974.
Diebold W., The Schuman Plan. A Study in Economic Cooperation 1950–1959, New York 1959.
Driscoll J., Association With Schumania, „The Journal of Industrial Economics” 1955, z. 2.
Driscoll J., Early Days in Schumania, „The Journal of Industrial Economics” 1954, z. 2.
Feld W., The Competences of the European Communities for the Conduct of External Relations, „Texas Law Review” 1965, z. 6.
Gaudet M., L’experience institutionelle des Communautes europeennes, w: Federation des Etats-Unis, Confederation suisse, Federation allemende, Communaute europeenne, Lausanne 1972.
Gillingham J., Coal, Steel, and the Rebirth of Europe, Cambridge 2004.
Griffiths R.T., The Schuman Plan Negotiations: The Economic Clauses, w: Die Anfange des Schumanplanes 1950/51, red. K. Schwabe, Baden–Baden 1988.
Haas E.B., The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–1957, Stanford 1958.
Heusdens J.J., R. de Horn R., Crisis Policy in the European Steel Industry in the Light of the ECSC Treaty, „Common Market Law Review” 1980, z. 1.
Hoffmann S., Organisations internationales et pouvoirs politiques des Etats, Paris 1954.
Hunter R., The Transport Problems within the European Coal and Steel Community, „Transport and Communication Review” 1953, z. 3.
Jenks W., Coordination: A New Problem of International Organisation, „Recueil des cours de l’Academie de droit international” 1950, z. 2.
Korowicz M.S., Organisations internationales et souverainete des Etats Membres, Paris 1961.
Lister L., Europe’s Coal and Steel Community. An Experiment in Economic Union, New York 1960.
Lister L., Europe’s Coal and Steel Community. An Experiment in Economic Union, New York 1960.
Mathijsen P., Some Legal Aspects of Euratom, „Common Market Law Review” 1966, z. 3.
Mathijsen P.S.R.F., Le droit de la CECA. Une etude des sources, La Haye 1957.
McKesson J.A., The Schuman Plan, „Political Science Quarterly” 1952, z. 1.
McKesson J.A., The Schuman Plan, „Political Science Quarterly” 1952, z. 1.
Michel V., Recheres sur les competences de la Communaute europeenne, Paris 2003.
Millon-Delsol Ch., Zasada pomocniczości, tłum. Cz. Porębski, Kraków 1993.
Monnet J., Les Etats-Unis d’Europe ont commence, Paris 1955.
Nanes A., The Evolution of EURATOM, „International Journal” 1958, z. 1.
Pella G., Die Gemeinschaft fur Kohle und Stahl als Musterbeispiel einer Integration, w: Europaische Integration, red. C. Grove Haines, Gottingen 1958.
Perrin R., de Mijolla L., Les lecons de la CECA, w: Quelle Europe?, Paris 1958.
Preda D., The Schuman Plan: the First Step to European Unity and the First European Antitrust Law, „The European Union Review” 2002, z. 2.
Prieur R., Les relations internes et externes de la CECA, Paris 1958.
Reuter P., La conception du pouvoir politique dans le Plan Schuman, „Revue francaise de science politique” 1951, z. 1.
Roux R., The Position of Labour under Schuman Plan, „International Law Review” 1952, z. 3.
Saganek P., Podział kompetencji pomiędzy Wspólnoty Europejskie a państwa członkowskie, Warszawa 2002.
Schmitt H.A., The ECSC: Operations of the First European Antitrust Law, 1952–1958, „The Business History Review” 1964, z. 1.
Shinoda H., Re-examining Sovereignty: From Classical Theory to the Global Age, New York 2000.
Sidjanski D., L’Originalite des Communautes europeennes et la repartition de leur pouvoirs, „Revue general de droit international public” 1961, z. 1.
Smith D.D., The European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM): The Limits of Supranationalism, „California Western International Law Journal” 1970, z. 1.
Sozański J., Porozumienia międzynarodowe Wspólnot i Unii Europejskiej, Toruń 2007.
Spierenburg D., Poidevin R., Historie de la Haute Autorite de la CECA, Bruxelles 1993.
Suchecki W., Teoria federalizmu, Warszawa 1968.
Vedel G., Euratom, „Revue economique” 1958, z. 2.
Vernon R., The Schuman Plan: Sovereign Powers of the ECSC, „American Journal of International Law” 1953, z. 2.
Wengler W., Die Volkerrechtssubjektivitat der Montanunion, w: Actes officiels du Congres international des etudes sur la CECA, Milano 1957, t. 3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 759
Number of citations: 0
