Proces Jezusa oczami historyka i prawnika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2013.011Keywords
sources of law, Roman criminal law, death penaltyAbstract
The aim of the paper is to show how the same event ? the trial and crucifixion of Jesus from Nazareth ? can be seen from various points of view. The author analyzes selected works devoted to the trail of Jesus, written by prominent historians and lawyers, in searching for an answer to a question whether the different perspective of view, which is dependent on the profession of the writer, leads to a different establishment of historical truth and different assessment of that truth. Author takes into consideration opinions of writers about the credibility of the historical sources, especially Gospels, for reconstruction of the real course of the Jesus? trial, the scope of competence of offices that run the trial, the content of the criminal charges and procedural errors. Author?s general conclusion is that the perspective of view is essential for the answer to the questions who is responsible for the Jesus? crucifixion and how much one can trust the Gospels in this issue.
References
Berda W., Jońca M., Quod homines credere volunt, id facile credunt, „Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne” 2005, z. 2.
Dąbrowski E., Proces Jezusa w świetle historyczno-krytycznym, Poznań–Warszawa–Lublin 1965.
Dominas K., Podsądni świata. Sokrates, Cyceron, Chrystus, Gniezno 2003.
Fricke W., Ukrzyżowany w majestacie prawa. Osoba i proces Jezusa z Galilei, przeł. K. Krzemieniowa, Gdynia 1996.
Jońca M., Słynne rzymskie procesy karne, Lublin 2009.
Ricciotti G., Życie Jezusa Chrystusa, przeł. J. Skowroński, Warszawa 2000.
Święcicka P., Głos w dyskusji nad procesem Jezusa, „Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne” 2007, z. 1.
Święcickiej P., Proces Jezusa w świetle prawa rzymskiego, Kraków 2005.
Thomas G., Proces: życie i krzyżowanie Jezusa, przeł. A Czarnocki, Warszawa 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 3417
Number of citations: 0