Arbiter jednostronnie mianowany przez stronę w arbitrażu międzynarodowym
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2013.008Keywords
arbitral tribunal, arbitration, international arbitration, party-appointed arbitratorAbstract
This paper concentrate on the role played by the party-appointed arbitrators in international arbitration and their neutrality. It is believed that in arbitral proceedings between two parties that are from different countries, party-appointed arbitrators serve as a translators of the legal system of nominating party to the other party and the chairman. Their duty is therefore to explain the other party and the rest of the tribunal the specific provisions of the law and cultural background that follows the party that appointed the them. However, in international arbitration party-appointed arbitrators cannot be seen as a advocates of the nominating party, because all arbitrators must be and remain impartial and independent through the entire arbitration. Moreover, arbitrators unlike the representatives of the parties are adjudicators that share certain core features with judges. Arbitrators, including those appointed unilaterally by the parties, render a final and binding ruling, based upon gathered record and theirs? own judgment. To guarantee arbitrators impartiality and independence, there are under obligation to file formal statements of their impartiality and independence, in which he must reveal any circumstances that might give reasonable doubts as to his impartiality and independence. Furthermore, the parties may file a challenge against an arbitrator on any ground that casts a doubt on his impartiality and independence.References
Bishop D., Reed L., Practical guidelines for interviewing, selecting and challenging party-appointed arbitrators in international commercial arbitration, “Arbitration International” 1998, nr 14.
Błaszczak Ł, Ludwik M., Sądownictwo polubowne (arbitraż), C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2007.
Byrne O., A New Code Of Ethics for Commercial Arbitrators: The Neutrality of Party Appointed Arbitrators on a Tripartite Panel, “Fordham Urban Law Journal” 2002, nr 30.
Carbonneau T., The Exercise Of Contract Freedom In The Making Of Arbitrationm Agreement, “Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law” 2003, nr 36.
Ereciński T., Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, cz. 4: Przepisy z zakresu cywilnego, cz. 5: Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy), Warszawa 2006.
Franck F., The Role of International Arbitrators, “ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law” 2006.
Gailard E., Goldman E., Savage B., Fouchard, Gailard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration, “Kluwer Law International” 1999.
Hunter M., Ethics of the International Arbitrator, “Arbitration” 1987, nr 53.
Lew J., L. Mistelis L., S. Kröll S., Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Lieberman S., Something’s Rotten in the State of Party Appointed Arbitration: Healing ADR’s Black Eye that is “Nonneutral Neutrals”, “Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution” 2004, nr 5/2.
Lowenfeld A., The Party-Appointed Arbitrator in International Controversies: Some Reflections, “Texas International Law Journal” 1995, nr 30.
Morawski L., Główne problemy współczesnej filozofii prawa. Prawo w toku przemian, LexisNexis, Warszawa 2005.
Mosk R., The Role of Party-Appointed Arbitrators in International Arbitration: Piasecki K., Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, t. 3: Komentarz do artykułów 1096–1217 KPC oraz aktów prawych UE regulujących międzynarodowe postępowanie cywilne, red. K. Piasecki, Warszawa 2007
Redfern A., Hunter M., Blackaby N., Partasides C., Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, “Kluwer Law International” 2004.
Rogers C., Ethics in International Arbitration, “Bocconi University Legal Studies Research Paper Series” 2008, nr 8.
Skoczylas J., Charakter prawny zapisu na sąd polubowny a autonomia regulacji prawnej arbitrażu (po nowelizacji z 2005 r.), w: Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie, red. J. Okolski, Warszawa 2010.
Smit H., The pernicious institution of party-appointed arbitrator, “Columbia FDI Perspectives” 2010, nr 33.
Taichert R., Why not provide for neutral party-appointed arbitrators?, “Dispute Resolution Journal” 2002/2003, nr 57/4.
The Experience of the Iran – United States Claims Tribunal, “Transnational Law” 1998, nr 1.
Trakman L., The impartiality and independence of arbitrators reconsidered, “International Arbitration Law Review” 2007, nr 10.
Vries H. de, International Commercial Arbitration: A Transnational View, “Journal of International Arbitration” 1984, z. 1.
Wiśniewski A.W., Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy w Polsce. Status prawny arbitrażu i arbitrów, Warszawa 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 390
Number of citations: 0