Acquisition and Development of Scrub Nursing Skills in Robotic-Assisted Cranial and Spinal Neurosurgical Procedures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15225/PNN.2024.13.1.5Keywords
neurosurgery, operative nursing, robotic scrub nursingAbstract
Introduction. In high-tech operative specialties, including neurosurgery, the rise of interest in robotic systems is observed, since these techniques are hoped to increase the precision of the operation. However, for the optimal implementation of these solutions, the close cooperation between surgeon and perioperative nursing team as well as adequate coordination of their actions is required. These skills needs to be gained and trained.
Aim. The following report describes the single center experience of the operating team in launching the robotic navigation in neurosurgical procedures from the vantage point of nursing team.
Material and Methods. This work contains a phenomenological analysis of learning process and of optimalisation in cooperating the work of the involved operating team during early phase of introducing the robotic neurosurgical procedures (both cranial and spinal). Here, the typical problems during implementation of these techniques with separate analysis of single steps of preparing and applying the tool sets are described, where critical points and the potential of failure elimination is highlighted.
Results. The preparing of the robotic surgical tool set is not demanding and differs only slightly from the preparation of standard sets designed for neuronavigation plus targeted cranial biopsy or percutaneous spine instrumentation, respectively. The key point is to synchronize the actions of the operating surgeon (-s), perioperative nurses and radiologic technicians.
Conclusions. Implementation of robotic techniques is a challenge for the whole neurosurgical team, including the scrub/circulating nurses. What is more important in the initial phase than (usually intuitive) operation of the devices, is the coordination of single team members’ actions and developing the communication skills regarding the planned course of the surgery and potential modification of its course, needed before the surgery starts. (JNNN 2024;13(1):29–35)
References
Farber S.H., Pacult M.A., Godzik J. et al. Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Technical Overview and Review of Key Concepts. Front Surg. 2021;8:578674.
McKenzie D.M., Westrup A.M., O’Neal C.M. et al. Robotics in spine surgery: A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;89:1–7.
Dlaka D., Švaco M., Chudy D. et al. Brain biopsy performed with the RONNA G3 system: a case study on using a novel robotic navigation device for stereotactic neurosurgery. Int J Med Robot. 2018;14(1).
Chiu T.L., Lin S.Z., Ahmed T., Huang C.Y., Chen C.H. Pilot study of a new type of machine vision-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery for EVD placement. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022;164(9):2385–2393.
Karasin B., Hardinge T., Eskuchen L., Watkinson J. Care of the Patient Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Brain Biopsy With Stereotactic Navigation: An Overview. AORN J. 2022;115(3):223–236.
Kronreif G., Ptacek W., Kornfeld M., Fürst M. Evaluation of robotic assistance in neurosurgical applications. J Robot Surg. 2012;6(1):33–39.
Yuk F.J., Carr M.T., Schupper A.J. et al. Da Vinci Meets Globus Excelsius GPS: A Totally Robotic Minimally Invasive Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2023;180:29–35.
Ho A.L., Pendharkar A.V., Brewster R. et al. Frameless Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: An Initial Experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019;17(4):424–431.
Jiang B., Karim Ahmed A., Zygourakis C.C. et al. Pedicle screw accuracy assessment in ExcelsiusGPS® robotic spine surgery: evaluation of deviation from pre-planned trajectory. Chin Neurosurg J. 2018;4:23.
Anderson W., Ponce F.A., Kinsman M.J. et al. Robotic-Assisted Navigation for Stereotactic Neurosurgery: A Cadaveric Investigation of Accuracy, Time, and Radiation. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023.
Minchev G., Kronreif G., Ptacek W. et al. Frameless Stereotactic Brain Biopsies: Comparison of Minimally Invasive Robot-Guided and Manual Arm-Based Technique. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;19(3):292–301.
Russell B. Understanding the role of the scrub nurse during robotic surgery. Nurs Stand. 2022;37(12):71–75.
Judy B.F., Soriano-Baron H., Jin Y. et al. Pearls and pitfalls of posterior superior iliac spine reference frame placement for spinal navigation: cadaveric series. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022;3(9):CASE21621.
Palese A., Infanti S. The experiences of nurses who participate in awake craniotomy procedures. AORN J. 2006;84(5):811–826.
Kanaly C.W., Backes D.M., Toossi N., Bucklen B. Robotic-assisted spine surgery allows for increased pedicle screw sizes while still improving safety as indicated by elevated triggered electromyographic thresholds. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(3):1007–1012.
Toossi N., Vardiman A.B., Benech C.A. et al. Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Robot-Assisted Surgery: A Multicenter Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(23):1613–1619.
Vardiman A.B., Wallace D.J., Booher G.A. et al. Does the accuracy of pedicle screw placement differ between the attending surgeon and resident in navigated robotic-assisted minimally invasive spine surgery? J Robot Surg. 2020;14(4):567–572.
Vardiman A.B., Wallace D.J., Booher G.A., Toossi N., Bucklen B.S. Decreasing the Pedicle Screw Misplacement Rate in the Thoracic Spine With Robot-guided Navigation. Clin Spine Surg. 2023;36(10):431–437.
Schuetze K., Kraus M., Eickhoff A., Gebhard F., Richter P.H. Radiation exposure for intraoperative 3D scans in a hybrid operating room: how to reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(8):1291–1300.
Vaccaro A.R., Harris J.A., Hussain M.M. et al. Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation. Global Spine J. 2020;10(7):814–825.
Zygourakis C.C., Ahmed A.K., Kalb S. et al. Technique: open lumbar decompression and fusion with the Excelsius GPS robot. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;45(VideoSuppl1):V6.
Godzik J., Mastorakos G.M., Nayar G., Hunter W.D., Tumialán L.M. Surgeon and staff radiation exposure in minimally invasive spinal surgery: prospective series using a personal dosimeter. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;1–7.
Hubbe U., Sircar R., Scheiwe C. et al. Surgeon, staff, and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: impact of 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation partially replacing conventional fluoroscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:142.
Klingler J.H., Scholz C., Hohenhaus M. et al. Radiation Exposure to Scrub Nurse, Assistant Surgeon, and Anesthetist in Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery Comparing 2D Conventional Fluoroscopy With 3D Fluoroscopy-based Navigation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Spine Surg. 2021;34(4):E211–E215.
Soliman M.A.R., Pollina J., Poelstra K., Chaudhary S., Foley K. Can a Spine Robot Be More Efficient and Less Expensive While Maintaining Accuracy? Int J Spine Surg. 2022;16(S2):S50–S54.
Menger R.P., Savardekar A.R., Farokhi F., Sin A. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Integration of Robotic Spine Technology in Spine Surgery. Neurospine. 2018;15(3):216–224.
Sarmanian J.D. Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS): Perioperative Nursing Professional Development Program. AORN J. 2015;102(3):241–253.
Vigo F., Egg R., Schoetzau A. et al. An interdisciplinary team-training protocol for robotic gynecologic surgery improves operating time and costs: analysis of a 4-year experience in a university hospital setting. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(1):89–96.
Henaux P.L., Michinov E., Rochat J., Hémon B., Jannin P., Riffaud L. Relationships Between Expertise, Crew Familiarity and Surgical Workflow Disruptions: An Observational Study. World J Surg. 2019;43(2):431–438.
Hill A.L., Scherer M.D., Kiani A. et al. The impact of a dedicated operating room team on robotic transplant program growth and fellowship training. Clin Transplant. 2023;37(11):e15103.
Ortiz Oshiro E., Ramos Carrasco A., Moreno Sierra J. et al. Desarrollo multidisciplinario de la cirugía robótica en un hospital universitario de tercer nivel: organización y resultados. Cir Esp. 2010;87(2):95–100.
Witmer H.D.D., Keçeli Ç., Morris-Levenson J.A. et al. Operative Team Familiarity and Specialization at an Academic Medical Center. Ann Surg. 2023;277(5):e1006–e1017.
Ballas D., Cesta M., Roulette G.D., Rusnak M., Ahmed R. Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum. J Vis Exp. 2018;(135):57286.
Bracq M.S., Michinov E., Arnaldi B. et al. Learning procedural skills with a virtual reality simulator: An acceptability study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;79:153–160.
Abdel Raheem A., Song H.J., Chang K.D., Choi Y.D., Rha K.H. Robotic nurse duties in the urology operative room: 11 years of experience. Asian J Urol. 2017;4(2):116–123.
Cavuoto L.A., Hussein A.A., Vasan V. et al. Improving Teamwork: Evaluating Workload of Surgical Team During Robot-assisted Surgery. Urology. 2017;107:120–125.
Haig F., Medeiros A.C.B., Chitty K., Slack M. Usability assessment of Versius, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020;2(1):e000028.
Almeras C., Almeras C. Operating room communication in robotic surgery: Place, modalities and evolution of a safe system of interaction. J Visc Surg. 2019;156(5):397–403.
Tiferes J., Hussein A.A., Bisantz A. et al. Are gestures worth a thousand words? Verbal and nonverbal communication during robot-assisted surgery. Appl Ergon. 2019;78:251–262.
Crawford N., Johnson N., Theodore N. Ensuring navigation integrity using robotics in spine surgery. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(1):177–183.
Calisto A., Dorfmüller G., Fohlen M., Bulteau C., Conti A., Delalande O. Endoscopic disconnection of hypothalamic hamartomas: safety and feasibility of robot-assisted, thulium laser-based procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14(6):563–572.
Zimmermann M., Krishnan R., Raabe A., Seifert V. Robot-assisted navigated endoscopic ventriculostomy: implementation of a new technology and first clinical results. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146(7):697–704.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 66
Number of citations: 0