Assessment of the Effect of Pain on Daily Functioning of Patients with the Diagnosed Back Pain Syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15225/PNN.2014.3.4.3Keywords
back pain, functional capacity, problems at work, active recreationAbstract
Introduction. The back pain syndrome is one of the most common health problem of the contemporary society. Acute pain syndromes of the lower section of the spine affect 28 people per 1000 inhabitants. The disease more often affects men aged 25–64. In the population of one hundred thousand inhabitants 107 men and 64 women suffer from acute pain syndrome of the cervical spine. Most often the pain occurs between 50 and 54 years of age. Also, back pain syndromes constitute a serious economic problem for the contemporary society as they are statistically the most frequent in the case of men and the second in the case of women reason for absence from work, and in 20% of cases they indicate the necessity of granting disability pension due to permanent inability to work.
Aim. Assessment of pain intensity effect on daily functioning of patients diagnosed with the back pain syndrome.
Material and Methods. The research included 187 patients diagnosed with back pain syndrome aged from 20 to 83 years and it was carried out in April and May 2013. The diagnostic survey method and statistical analysis were applied.
Results. The most difficult issue for the respondents in their daily functioning was to accept permanent pain stimuli (100%), permanent stiffness in the back or neck, (96.33%), copying with the pain when the performance of everyday duties required prolonged sitting or standing (99.47%) as well as the performance of daily household activities (100%). Back pain to greater or lesser extent resulted in the loss of control over major spheres of everyday life in the respondents, on average from 3.34 to 6.37 on the scale from 1 to 10 points. All respondents admitted having problems with remaining in the sitting position for a long time. The average loss of fitness in the group of respondents ranged 39.30±18.09 points (Me=37; range from 7 to 88 points). Based on the average value ± 1 SD it was stated that 16.58% (n=31) of respondents had light malfunction, whereas 65.78% (n=123) had moderate and 17.64% (n=33) serious.
Conclusions. 1. Chronic back pain has a devastating impact on the daily functioning of patients with diagnosed spinal pain syndrome 2. The most difficult issue for the respondents in their daily functioning was to accept permanent pain stimuli 3. The average strength of the negative impact of the back pain on daily functioning ranged from 6.25 to 6.49 in the scale from 1 to 10 points. 4. All respondents admitted that back pain to greater or lesser extent resulted in a loss of control over major spheres of everyday life. 5. Just over a quarter of respondents (25.13%) did not have major problems, resulting from the pain, with the performance of daily duties at work. 6. For more than three quarters of the respondents (77.01%) pain while sitting in the chair for a few hours was a significant problem in everyday functioning. 7. The statistical analysis carried out, showed a significant correlation between the intensity of the back pain and lowering of physical fitness. (JNNN 2014;3(4):157–168)
References
Van Hooff M.L., van der Merwe J.D., O’Dowd J. et al. Daily functioning and self-management in patients with chronic low back pain after an intensive cognitive behavioral programme for pain management. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1517–1526.
Carette S., Phil M., Fehlings M.G. Cervical Radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:392–399.
Hahnel S., Forsting M., Dorfler A., Sator K. Radiologische Befunde bei der lumbalen Spinalcanalstenose. Acta Radiol. 1996;165–170.
Felton B.J., Revension T.A., Hionrichsen G.A. (adaptacja Juczyński Z.). Skala akceptacji choroby AIS. W: Juczyński Z. Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychoonkologii zdrowia. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych, Warszawa 2009;162–166.
Czarnecka M.S., Tylka J. Cechy osobowości a ocena i strategie radzenia sobie z bólem. Ból. 2010;11:9–23.
Sandroni P., Martin D.P., Bruce B.K., Rome J.D. Congenital idiopathic inability to perceive pain: A new syndrome of insensitivity to pain and itch with preserved small fibers. Pain. 2006;122:210–215.
Lorencowicz R., Stachyra U., Przychodzka E. et al. Natężenie bólu oraz strategie radzenia sobie z bólem w grupie pacjentów z dyskopatią. W: Markocka-Mączka K. (Red.). Środowiskowe uwarunkowania dobrostanu w chorobie i niepełnosprawności. NeuroCentrum, Lublin 2010;245–260.
Weisenberg M. Cognitive aspects of pain. In Texrbook of Pain. Churchil-Livingstone. New York 2000;331–344.
Gurowiec P. Psychologiczne sposoby leczenia bólu. W: Psychologia radzenia sobie ze stresem. Zeszyty Naukowe WSHE w Łodzi 2002;1:21.
Sedlak K. Czynniki psychologiczne a odczuwanie bólu. W: Dobrogowski J., Kuś M., Sedlak K., Wordliczek J. Ból i jego leczenie. Springer PWN, Warszawa 1996.
Jaracz J., Rybakowski J. Depresja a ból: Nowe dane kliniczne, neurobiologiczne i psychofarmakologiczne. Psychiatr Pol. 2005;39:937–950.
Skopec R. Mechanism Linking Aggression Stress through Inflammation to Cancer. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2011;3:134–139.
Bair M.J., Robinson R.L., Katon W., Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity; a literature review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2433–2445.
Fernandez E., Turk D.C. The utility of cognitive coping strategies for altering pain perception. Pain. 1989;38:123
Jensen M.P., Turnenr J.A., Romano J.M. Changes in beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:655–662.
Tunks E., Marskey H. Psychotherapy of pain. W: Bonica J.J. (Red.). The management of pain. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1990.
Pyszkowska J. Możliwości oceny bólu przewlekłego, próba obiektywizacji oceny bólu za pomocą zmodyfikowanego arkusza oceny bólu. Psychoonkologia. 1999;4:13–27.
Aronson E. Człowiek — istota społeczna, Warszawa 1987.
Sokolnicka H. Jakość życia pacjentów ze złamaniem w obrębie bliższej nasady kości udowej leczonych operacyjnie w Oddziale Urazowo-Ortopedycznym. Nowa Medycyna. 2009;9.
Lorencowicz R., Jasik J., Turowski K., Zielińska M., Baczewska B., Brzozowska A. Wpływ dolegliwości bólowych kręgosłupa na codzienne funkcjonowanie jednostki. W: Międzynarodowa Konferencja Naukowa „Zdrowie człowieka w teorii i praktyce”. Lublin, 8–9 grudnia 2011. Streszczenie, s. 45–46.
Lorencowicz R., Jasik J., Turowski K. et al. Wpływ dolegliwości bólowych kręgosłupa na aktywność zawodową pielęgniarek. W: Markocka-Mączka K. (Red.). Społeczne uwarunkowania dobrostanu w niepełnosprawności. NeuroCentrum, Lublin 2011;49–62.
Czapiński J. Indywidualna jakość i styl życia. Diagnoza Społeczna 2013 Warunki i Jakość Życia Polaków — Raport. Contemporary Economics. 2013;7:162–267 DOI: 10.5709/ce.1897-9254.107.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 199
Number of citations: 0