Neurosurgical Spine Implants in Geriatric Patients Treated Surgically for Lumbar Stenosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15225/PNN.2021.10.3.1Keywords
elderly patients, spine implants, spine surgeryAbstract
Introduction. The incidence of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis increases with age. While young people tend to
have simple disc herniations with root compression, older people develop degenerative stenosis: facet joint hypertrophy,
osteophytes, and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. A typical for senility is neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar
foraminal stenosis. Its symptoms decrease in spine flexion.
Aim. The study consisted of a retrospective evaluation of medical data: analysis of the patient’s age, description of
the surgical procedure and a list of spine implants.
Material and Methods. The analysis included patients treated surgically for lumbar stenosis in 2020 in Neurosurgical
Department of Collegium Medicum in Nicolaus Copernicus University (Bydgoszcz, Poland).
Results. The perioperative risk increases with the age of patients, therefore procedures in elderly patients should
usually be less invasive, ephemeral, and even under local anesthesia. Therefore, neurosurgeons tend to insert spinal
implants in senility to support the surgical effect and optimize the time of the procedure. Interspinous spacers are
implants for neurogenic claudication. Interspinous spacers causes foraminal distraction and thus can theoretically
induce nerve roots decompression in indirect mechanism, less invasive, with less tissue damage. We notice significantly
more frequent use of interspinous spacers in patients over seventy.
Conclusions. This observation requires further research and analysis; however, it is consistent with the available
literature and the actual state of clinical practice. This has potentially important implications for neurosurgical
nursing — in geriatric patients after lumbar spine surgery, implants are significantly more common — interspinous
spacers, which should be considered in nursing perioperative recommendations. (JNNN 2021;10(3):91–95)
References
Jensen R.K., Jensen T.S., Koes B., Hartvigsen J. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(9):2143–2163.
Amin R.M., Andrade N.S., Neuman B.J. Lumbar Disc Herniation. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4): 507–516.
Benz R.J., Garfin S.R. Current techniques of decompression of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384: 75–81.
Lee G.Y., Lee J.W., Choi H.S., Oh K.J., Kang H.S. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40(8):1033–1039.
Arinzon Z., Adunsky A., Fidelman Z., Gepstein R. Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(1):32–37.
Wolters U., Wolf T., Stützer H., Schröder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of
postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77(2):217 –222.
Lee J., Hida K., Seki T., Iwasaki Y., Minoru A. An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(1): 72–77; discussion 78.
Ryu S.J., Kim I.S. Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;47(5):338–344.
Wan Z., Wang S., Kozanek M. et al. The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(3):400–410.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 226
Number of citations: 0