The Relationship Between the Language System and its Actualisations in Construction Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LinCop.2013.025Keywords
Construction Grammar, usage-based system, construction, constructAbstract
Aiming to illustrate how the relationship between the language system and its actualisations in usage is envisaged in contemporary linguistic models that draw from and modify de Saussure’s idea of langue and parole, the paper presents the vision of this relationship in Construction Grammar (a model developed in various variants by C.J. Fillmore, A. Goldberg, P. Kay, M. Fried and others), belonging to the widely-understood cognitive trend in linguistics. The focus is on the distinction between the concept of construction, a conventionalised pairing of form and meaning/function, being an element of the system, and the concept of construct, a real utterance used in communication, being an actualisation of many constructions. Construction Grammar is a usage-based model, assuming that language system generalisations emerge from frequent usage. Therefore, the article also discusses the phenomenon of coercion, i.e. “stretching” constructions to combine with “unfitting” lexemes, seen not as a breach of the system but as one of the mechanisms of its creative use to construct new meanings, which may lead to changes in constructions, to the emergence of new ones, and hence to the modification of the system.
References
BOAS H. C., 2013, Cognitive Construction Grammar, w: T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 231–252.
BOGUSŁAWSKI A., 1978, Towards an operational grammar, Studia Semiotyczne 8, s. 29–90.
BORER H., 2005, The Normal Course of Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BYBEE J. L., 2013, Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions, w: T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 49–69.
CROFT W., 2007, Construction Grammar, w: D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 463–508.
DANCYGIER B., 2011, Modification and constructional blends in the use of proper names, Constructions and Frames 3(2), s. 208–235.
DIESSEL H., 2013, Construction Grammar and first language acquisition, w: T. Hoff-mann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 347–364.
FILLMORE C. J., 1988, The mechanisms of Construction Grammar, Proceedings of the Annual Meetings of Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, s. 35–55.
FILLMORE C. J., KAY P., O’CONNOR M. C., 1988, Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone, Language 64(3), s. 501–538.
FRIED M., 2009, Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis, Construc-tions and Frames 1(2), s. 261–290.
FRIED M., 2013, Principles of constructional change, w: T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press, s. 419–437.
FRIED M., ÖSTMAN J.-O., 2004, Construction Grammar: a thumbnail sketch, w: M. Fried, J.-O. Östman (red.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language per-spective, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, s. 11–86.
FRIED M., ÖSTMAN J.-O., 2005. Construction Grammar and spoken language: the case of pragmatic particles, Journal of Pragmatics 37(11), s. 1752–1778.
GEERAERTS D., CUYCKENS H., 2007, Introducing cognitive linguistics, w: D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 3–21.
GOLDBERG A. E., 1995, Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argu-ment structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GOLDBERG A. E., 2003, Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5), s. 219–224, [online:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9.
GOLDBERG A. E., 2006, Constructions at work. The nature of generalizations in language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GOLDBERG A. E., 2013, Constructionist approaches, w: T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press, s. 15–31.
GOLDBERG A. E., CASENHIER D., WHITE T. R., 2007, Constructions as categories of language, New Ideas in Psychology 25(2), s. 70–86.
GOLDBERG A. E, JACKENDOFF R., 2004, The English resultative as a family of constructions, Language 80(3), s. 532–568.
HOFFMANN T., TROUSDALE G., 2013, Construction Grammar: introduction, w: T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 1–12.
MICHAELIS L. A., 2004, Type shifting in Construction Grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual corecion, Cognitive Linguistics 15(1), s. 1–67.
MICHAELIS L. A., 2013, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, w: T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 134–152.
MÜLLER S., 2013, Unifying Everything: Some Remarks on Simpler Syntax, Construction Grammar, Minimalism and HPSG, [online:] http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/unifying-everything.pdf, [15.11.2013].
ROZWADOWSKA B., 2012, Neokonstruktywizm na granicy leksykonu i gramatyki, w: P. Stalmaszczyk (red.), Współczesne językoznawstwo generatywne. Podstawy metodologiczne, Łódź: Katedra Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego, Wydawnictwo Primum Verbum, s. 193–214.
SAUSSURE F. DE, 1961, Kurs językoznawstwa ogólnego, tłum. K. Kasprzyk, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
SCHÖNEFELD D., 2006, Constructions, Constructions SV1-1/2006, [online:] http://elanguage.net/journals/constructions/article/view/16/36, [1.07.2013].
STEELS L., 2013, Fluid Construction Grammar, w: T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 153–167.
SZYMAŃSKA I., 2011, Mosaics. A Construction-Grammar-based approach to translation, Warszawa: Semper.
SZYMAŃSKA I., ŚPIEWAK G., 2006, Gramatyka konstrukcji – założenia teoretyczne i pytania metodologiczne, w: P. Stalmaszczyk (red.), Metodologie językoznawstwa. Podstawy teoretyczne, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, s. 174–195.
TOMASELLO M., 2003, Czy małe dzieci posiadają składniową kompetencję osób dorosłych?, tłum. W. Kubiński, w: E. Dąbrowska, W. Kubiński (red.), Akwizycja języka w świetle językoznawstwa kognitywnego, Kraków: Universitas, s. 144–222.
TOMASELLO M., 2006, Construction Grammar for kids, Constructions SV1-11/2006, [online:] http://elanguage.net/journals/constructions/article/view/26, [10.03.2013].
VERHAGEN A., 2009, The conception of constructions as complex signs. Emergence of structure and reduction to usage, Constructions and Frames 1(1), s. 119–152.
ZIEGELER D., 2007, A word of caution on coercion, Journal of Pragmatics 39(5), s. 990–1028.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 493
Number of citations: 0