Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • Čeština
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Français (Canada)
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Français (Canada)
  • Hrvatski
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

LUD. Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Ludoznawczego

“Are we still a family?” The perspective from Romanian transnational families
  • Home
  • /
  • “Are we still a family?” The perspective from Romanian transnational families
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 103 (2019) /
  4. ANTROPOLOGIA POLSKA W SIECI ANTROPOLOGII ŚWIATOWYCH

“Are we still a family?” The perspective from Romanian transnational families

Authors

  • Iulia Elena Hossu Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities Cluj-Napoca, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/lud103.2019.03

Keywords

transnational families, kinship, family practices, Romanian society, “diffuse” family

Abstract

In 2015 the Romanian anthropologist Vintilă Mihăilescu wrote about the practice of migration in the case of the Romanian society, showing how it is ultimately deeply rooted, before 1989, in the communist period. Under the pressure of internal migration from villages to cities, the traditional Romanian family suffered a major structural transformation. According to the Romanian anthropologist, the diffuse family – household, as he calls it, seems to be “the grandmother” of the transnational family. The current practices of transnational families were formed based on these roots, of the “diffuse” family. Starting from the idea of Mihăilescu, the aim of this articleis to investigate the main (re)structures of the kinship practices in the Romanian society under the impact of external migration after 1989. One of the findings of the study shows that in the Romanian traditional society, preserving kinship cohesion meant a series of obligations and liabilities that were often transmitted from one generation to another without being questioned. They basically constituted and maintained the channel of communication between family members. The members of transnational families have absorbed these traditional structures, weaving over new formulas to adapt family practices(Morgan: 2011) to the specificity of transnational living, reformulating at the same time the traditional rules of kinship and adapting them to the new way of living. The study is based on materials derived from a qualitative research in five communities— three in Romania and two abroad. 

Author Biography

Iulia Elena Hossu, Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Iulia-Elena Hossu PhD works as researcher at the Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities, Cluj-Napoca, Romania [http://ispmn.gov.ro/]. She obtained her PhD in Anthropology at the “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, with a thesis on kindred relations with focus on the marriage. Her last article is “Our Westerner”: The Role of Romanian-naturalized Youth in Reconfiguring Moldavian Transnational Families, in Ducu, V., Nedelcu, M., Telegdi-Csetri, A. (Eds.) Childhood and Parenting in Transnational Settings, Springer, 2018. Currently she is a researcher within the project (RE)LOCAL - Resituating the local in cohesion and territorial development [https://relocal.eu/project-participants/], as a member of the DESIRE (Romania) research team.

References

Anghel, R.G. (2008). Migraţia şi problemele ei: perspectiva transnaţională ca o nouă modalitate de analiză a etnicităţii şi schimbării sociale în România. Working Papers. Cluj Napoca: ISPMN Publishing.

Baldassar, L., Baldock, C., Wilding, R. (2007). Families caring across borders: Migration, ageing and transnational caregiving. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Deleuze, G., Guatarri, F. (2000) [1972]. Anti-Œdipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem and Helen R. Lane. London and New York: Continuum.

Eliade, M. (1959). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Heller, W. (1998). Romania: Migration, Socio-economic Transformation and Perspectives of Regional Development. München: Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft (SüdosteuropaStudien, 62).

Herrera Lima, F. (2001). “Transnational Families: Institutions of transnational social space”. In L. Pries (ed.) New Transnational Social Spaces. International migration and transnational companies in the early twenty-first century. London: Routledge, pp. 77-93.

Hossu, I.E. (2018a): Relațiile de înrudire. Căsătoria – atitudini, practici și dinamici/Study of Kinship Relations. Marriage – Attitudes, Practices. Cluj: Mega.

Hossu, I.E. (2018b). “Our Westerner”: The Role of Romanian-naturalized Youth in Reconfiguring Moldavian Transnational Families. 10.1007/978-3-319-90942-4_5.

Hossu, I.E., Ducu, V. (2017). Departe și totuși aproape: fragmente din viața familiilor transnaționale. Cluj: Mega.

Kligman, G. (1998b). Nunta mortului: ritual, poetică şi cultură populară în Transilvania. Iaşi: Polirom.

Kligman, G.. (1998a). The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania.

Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mauss, M. (2016). The Gift (Selected, annotated, and translated by Jane I. Guyer). Chicago: HAU Books. (Original work published 1925).

Mihăilescu, V. (2015). “Familie, case şi migraţiune”. Sinteza, 25.12.2015. http://revistasinteza.ro/familie-case-si-migratie/ [Accessed 15.08.2019].

Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking Family Practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Parutis, V. (2011). “"Home" for Now or "Home" for Good?: East European Migrants’ Experiences of Accommodation in London”. Home Cultures 8(3): 265-296.

Sandu, D. et al. (2006). Locuirea temporară în străinătate migraţia economică a românilor : 1990-2006. Fundația pentru o Societate Deschisă: București.

Scurtu, V. (1966). Termenii de înrudire în limba română. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.

Stahl, H. H. (1936). “Rudenie spirituală din Năşie, la Drăguş”. Sociologie românească 1(7-9): 25-36.

Șeuleanu, I. (1995). Dincoace de sacru, dincolo de profan: (studii şi eseuri de folclor). Târgu Mureș: Tipomur.

LUD. Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Ludoznawczego

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2019-12-13

How to Cite

1.
HOSSU, Iulia Elena. “Are we still a family?” The perspective from Romanian transnational families. LUD. Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Ludoznawczego. Online. 13 December 2019. Vol. 103, pp. 49-65. [Accessed 2 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/lud103.2019.03.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 103 (2019)

Section

ANTROPOLOGIA POLSKA W SIECI ANTROPOLOGII ŚWIATOWYCH

License

  1. The authors give the publisher (Polish Ethnological Society) non-exclusive license to use the work in the following fields:
    • recording of a Work / subject of a related copyright;
    • reproduction (multiplication) Work / subject of a related copyright in print and digital technique (ebook, audiobook);
    • marketing of units of reproduced Work / subject of a related copyright;
    • introduction of Work / object of related copyright to computer memory;
    • dissemination of the work in an electronic version in the formula of open access under the Creative Commons license (CC BY - ND 3.0).
  2. The authors give the publisher the license free of charge.
  3. The use of the work by publisher in the above mentioned aspects is not limited in time, quantitatively nor territorially.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 478
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Français (Canada)
  • Hrvatski
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

transnational families, kinship, family practices, Romanian society, “diffuse” family
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop