Affects, Intentions, and Accidents Nonsite’s Critique of Affect Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LC.2022.020Keywords
affect, intention, autonomy, nonsiteAbstract
The paper presents a detailed summary of various ways in which the so-called affect studies have been analysed and criticised by authors and researchers associated with the academic journal nonsite.org. It starts with a brief introduction (aimed specifically at a Polish reader) to the unique brand of intentionalism associated, in literary studies, primarily with Walter Benn Michaels; and then explains how the understanding of meaning and interpretation shared by various nonsite.org authors lays the ground for a fundamental criticism of the affect studies, both from a methodological and political perspective. The paper aims to compare the criticism of affect theory found in Ruth Leys’ work, the argument made against “affective formalism” by Todd Cronan, and the idea of “effective fallacy” as proposed by Jennifer Ashton, while also providing Nicholas Brown’s understanding of the work’s autonomy as a highly useful context for any discussion on affects in art/literature. In the closing part, the paper argues that what is required in order to better understand the fundamental faults with the affect studies, is a renewed interest in G. E. M. Anscombe’s work on intention.
References
Anscombe, Elizabeth G. M. 2000. Intention. 2nd Edition. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Ashton, Jennifer 2011. „Two Problems with a Neuroaesthetic Theory of Interpretation”. Nonsite.org 2. https://nonsite.org/two-problems-with-a-neuroaesthetic-theory-of-interpretation/ [15.03.2022].
Beardsley, Monroe C. [&] William K. Wimsatt 2006. „Błąd intencji”. Tłum. Jacek Gutorow. W: Anna Burzyńska [&] Michał P. Markowski (red.). Teorie literatury XX wieku. Antologia. Kraków: Znak.
Brown, Nicholas 2019. Autonomy: The Social Ontology of Art under Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
Brown, Nicholas 2020. „Late Postmodernism”. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 22, 3.
Burzyńska, Anna 2006. Anty-teoria literatury. Kraków: Universitas.
Burzyńska, Anna [&] Michał P. Markowski (red.). Teorie literatury XX wieku. Antologia. Kraków: Znak.
Cavell, Stanley 1976. „A Matter of Meaning It”. W: Stanley Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chandler, Raymond 1979. Długie pożegnanie. Tłum. Krzysztof Klinger. Warszawa: Czytelnik.
Cronan, Todd 2013. Against Affective Formalism. Matisse, Bergson, Modernism. Minneapolis–London: University of Minnesota Press.
Culler, Jonathan D. 2007. The Literary in Theory. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Davidson, Donald 2001. „Intention and Action”. W: Donald Davidson. Esssays on Actions and Events. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
Flatley, Jonathan 2017. „Reading for Mood”. Representations 140, 1: 137–158.
Fried, Michael 1998. „Art and Objecthood”. W: Michael Fried. Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago–London: University of Chicago Press.
Grimstad, Paul et al. 2017. „Experience and Experimental Writing: Literary Pragmatism from Emerson to the Jameses”. Nonsite.org 22. https://nonsite.org/experience-and-experimentalwriting/ [15.03.2022].
Hirsch, Eric D. 1983. „Against Theory?”. Critical Inquiry 9, 4: 743–747.
Hirsch, Eric 1992. „In Defense of the Author”. W: Gary Iseminger. Intention and Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hornsby, Jennifer 2011. “Actions in Their Circumstances”. W: Anton Ford [&] Jennifer Hornsby [&] Frederick Stoutland (red.). Essays on Anscombe’s Intention. Cambridge–London: Harvard University Press.
Kaczmarski, Paweł. 2019. “Materialism As Intentionalism: on the Possibility of a »New Materialist« Literary Criticism”. Praktyka Teoretyczna 34: 191–235.
Knapp, Steven [&] Walter B. Michaels 1982. „Against Theory”. Critical Inquiry 8, 4 (Summer): 723–742.
Knapp, Steven [&] Walter B. Michaels 1983. „A Reply to Our Critics”. Critical Inquiry 9, 4 ( June): 790–800.
Knapp, Steven [&] Walter B. Michaels 1985. “A Reply to Richard Rorty: What Is Pragmatism?”. Critical Inquiry 11 3 (March): 466–473.
Knapp, Steven [&] Walter B. Michaels 1987. “Against Theory 2: Hermeneutics and Deconstruction”. Critical Inquiry 14, 1 (Autumn):
–68.
Leys, Ruth 2017. The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique. Chicago–London: University of Chicago Press.
Massumi, Brian 2013. „Autonomia afektu”. Tłum. Adam Lipszyc. Teksty Drugie 6: 112–135.
Michaels, Walter B. 1982. „Is There a Politics of Interpretation?”. Critical Inquiry 9, 1 (September): 248–258.
Michaels, Walter B. 2011. Kształt znaczącego. Od roku 1967 do końca historii. Tłum. Jan Burzyński. Kraków: korporacja ha!art.
Michaels, Walter B. 2012. “Normativity, Materiality and Inequality: The Politics of the Letter in Paul de Man”. W: Martin McQuillan (red.). The Political Archive of Paul de Man: Property, Sovereignty and the Theotropic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Michaels, Walter B. 2014. „The Force of a Frame: Owen Kydd’s Durational Photographs”. Nonsite.org 11. https://nonsite.org/the-force-of-a-frame/ [15.03.2022].
Michaels, Walter B. 2015. The Beauty of a Social Problem: Photography, Autonomy, Economy. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Michaels, Walter B. 2016a. „»I Do What Happens«: Anscombe and Winogrand”. Nonsite.org 3. https://nonsite.org/i-do-what-happens/ [15.03.2022].
Michaels, Walter B. 2016b. „Anscombe and Winogrand, Danto and Mapplethorpe: A Reply to Dominic McIver Lopes”. Nonsite.org 26. https://nonsite.org/anscombe-and-winogrand-danto-and-mapplethorpe/ [15.03.2022].
Michaels, Walter B. 2017. „Picturing the Whole: Form, Reform, Revolution”. Socialist Register 53: 323–338.
Michaels, Walter B. 2018. „Grimstad on Experience, Flatley on Affect: A Response”. Nonsite.org 22. https://nonsite.org/grimstad-on-experience-flatley-on-affect/ [15.03.2022].
Michaels, Walter B. 2019. „Blind Time (Drawing with Anscombe)”. REAL 35, 1 (December): 49–60.
Michaels, Walter B. 2020. „Eyes Wide Shut: Anscombe/Action/Art”. Nonsite.org 32. https://nonsite.org/eyeswide-shut-anscombe-action-art/ [15.03.2022].
Thaler, Richard [&] Cass Sunstein 2017. Impuls. Jak podejmować właściwe decyzje dotyczące zdrowia, dobrobytu i szczęścia. Tłum. Justyna Grzegorczyk. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
Ulicka, Danuta 2007. „Obrona teorii”. Teksty Drugie 4: 175–196.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-11-09 (3)
- 2022-07-28 (2)
- 2022-07-27 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Paweł Kaczmarski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 37
Number of citations: 0