Remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in the opinion of academic teachers. Survey research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2023.13.01.009Keywords
covid-19, remote learning, distant learning, academic teachers, educationAbstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the academic community had to drop out of the full-time on-site education and switch to distance learning. After two years of this state of affairs and the current return to the traditional form, we would like to explore the opinions of academic teachers on this form of teaching. The study was a questionnaire-based survey, including 86 teaching staff members of the Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, working at four faculties. The teachers assessed the level of distance learning as average, no different from the traditional approach. However, they pointed out that the involvement, activity of students, regularity of work, quality of the assignments completed, and the adequacy of the grades received is greater in the traditional approach. In the case of remote learning, in the group's assessment, the timeliness of performing the assignments had not deteriorated. The most frequently indicated advantage of remote learning was time saving, while the most common disadvantage was reduced contact with students.
In the teachers' opinion, the traditional mode of learning still has an advantage over distance learning. Studies assessing effectiveness in achieving educational goals are needed in order to objectify the results.
References
Polskiej Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczpospolitej. https://www.gov.pl/web/gsse-warszawa/odwolanie-na-obszarze-rzeczypospolitej-polskiej-stanu-epidemii. [Online]
Ritchie H. i inni. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). . https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus. [Online] 2020.
Czuba B Mlodawski J, Kajdy A, Sys D, Cnota W, Mlodawska M, Kwiatkowski S, Guzik P, Wielgos M, Rybak-Krzyszkowska M, Fuchs A, Swiercz G, Borowski D. Implementation of the Publicly Funded Prenatal Screening Programme in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. . Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(5):1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051317.
Romaniuk M. W. i Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, J. Zdalna edukacja kryzysowa w APS w okresie pandemii COVID-19. Edukacja hybrydowa. Warszawa. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.30338.35524.
Shambour MKY Abu-Hashem MA. Analysing lecturers' perceptions on traditional vs. distance learning: A conceptual study of emergency transferring to distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(3):3225-3245. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10719-5. Epub 2021 Sep 16. PMID: 34548840; PMCID: PMC8444535.
Alshangeeti A., Alsaghier, H., & Nguyen, A. (2009). Faculty perceptions of attributes affecting the diffusion of online learning in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative study. In Proceedings of the international conference on e-learning, 10–24.
Arias J. J., Swinton, J., & Anderson, K. Online vs. face-to-face: A comparison of student outcomes with random assignment. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching 2018, 12(2), 1–23.
Narayan N., & Singh, S. K. (2020). Online learners’ experiences and views towards online courses: A case study of the University of the South Pacific. . Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 29–41.
Ní Fhloinn E Fitzmaurice O. Challenges and Opportunities: Experiences of Mathematics Lecturers Engaged in Emergency Remote Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic. . Mathematics. 2021; 9(18):2303. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182303.
Carlotto M.S. . A síndrome de Burnout e o trabalho docente. Psicologia em Estudo 2002, 7, 21–29. [CrossRef].
Miguel C. i inni. Impact of COVID-19 on Medicine Lecturers’ Mental Health and Emergency Remote Teaching Challenges. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18.
SUSILANINGSIH Francisca Sri, et al. Quality of work-life among lecturers during online learning in COVID-19 pandemic period: A scoping review. . Malaysian J Med Health Sci, 2021, 17: 4.
Ozcan H.C. Ugur M.G., Kutlar I.,. Conjoined twins in a triplet pregnancy. Saudi medical journal, 38(3), 307–309. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.3.16103.
Mutchinick OM Luna-Muñoz L, Amar E at al. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. . Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011 Nov 15;157C(4):274-87. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30321. Epub 2011 Oct 14. PMID: 22002822; PMCID: PMC4457318.
Osterman MJK Hamilton BE, Martin JA, et al. Births: Final Data for 2020. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2022;70:1.
Baken L Rousian M, Kompanje EJ, Koning AH, van der Spek PJ, Steegers EA, Exalto N. Diagnostic techniques and criteria for first-trimester conjoined twin documentation: a review of the literature illustrated by three recent cases. . Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013 Nov;68(11):743-52. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000000. PMID: 24193193.
Bega G Wapner R, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K. Diagnosis of conjoined twins at 10 weeks using three-dimensional ultrasound: a case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;16(4):388-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00189.x. PMID: 11169318.
Usta IM Awwad JT. A false positive diagnosis of conjoined twins in a triplet pregnancy: pitfalls of first trimester ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2000 Feb;20(2):169-70. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(200002)20:2<169::aid-pd768>3.0.co;2 ;2-c. PMID: 10694695.
Castro P Werner H, Matos AP, Ribeiro G, Lopes J, Araujo Júnior E. Antenatal Diagnosis of Parapagus Conjoined Twins: 3D Virtual and 3D Physical Models. . Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Dec;43(12):985-987. English. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739297. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
Heuer GG Madsen PJ, Flanders TM, Kennedy BC, Storm PB, Taylor JA. Separation of craniopagus twins by a multidisciplinary team. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (04) 358-364 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805132. .
Liu H., Deng, C., Hu, Q. et al. Conjoined twins in dichorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy: a report of three cases and literature review. . BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 687 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04165-x.
Goldberg Y Ben-Shlomo I, Weiner E, Shalev E. First trimester diagnosis of conjoined twins in a triplet pregnancy after IVF and ICSI: case report. . Hum Reprod. 2000 Jun;15(6):1413-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.6.1413. PMID: 10831580.
Gao Q Pang H, Luo H. Conjoined twins in a spontaneous monochorionic triplet pregnancy: A case report and literature review. . Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24490. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024490. PMID: 33530268; PMCID: PMC7850647.
Talebian M Rahimi-Sharbaf F, Shirazi M, Teimoori B, Izadi-Mood N, Sarmadi S. Conjoined twins in a monochorionic triplet pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a case report. . Iran J Reprod Med. 2015 Nov;13(11):729-32. PMID: 26730249; PMCID: PMC4695689.
Sepulveda W Munoz H, Alcalde JL. Conjoined twins in a triplet pregnancy: early prenatal diagnosis with three-dimensional ultrasound and review of the literature. . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;22(2):199-204. doi: 10.1002/uog.185. PMID: 12905520.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jakub Mlodawski, Anna Swiercz, Marta Mlodawska, Aleksandra Piąta, Grzegorz Swiercz, Barbara Gawdzik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 400
Number of citations: 0