Exploring the global visibility of African scholarly communication: a comparative analysis of open access repositories in Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/FT.2024.005Keywords
Open Access Repositories, African repositories, African Scholarly Communications, Scholarly output visibility, OpenDOAR, Digital repositoriesAbstract
Purpose: This paper is a comparative study of repositories in Africa for the global visibility of African scholarly communication. It aims to provide a detailed description and comparison of repositories in Africa by region, country, repository type, year established, content type, software type, and language of content.
Design/methodology/approach: Using a systematic content review methodology, and a total enumerative sampling technique, a total of 259African repositories drawn from the Directory of Open Access Repositories database over one week were reviewed.
Findings: The study revealed that out of the 5,905 repositories listed, 259 are from Africa. The repositories are spread across 24 out of the 54 countries that make up the continent, thus making a 44% representation of African scholarly communication by countries in the global space. By region, Eastern Africa had the highest number at 101 (39%) repositories invariably becoming the African region with the most visible scholarly communication, while Central Africa had the least number of OARs at 1 (.4%). By countries, South Africa took the top of other countries at 51 (20%) repositories, while Cameroon was the least at 1 (0.3%). The African scholarly communication with the most visibility is Social Sciences at 223 while the least archived subject is Mathematics at 176. African scholarly communications made available on the global space are mostly generated by institutions of learning as the study shows that 243 (94%) OARs in Africa are institutional repositories.
Originality/value: The study exposed the paltry contribution of African repositories in ensuring the global visibility of African scholarly communication. It reveals the weakness of the African continent in exploring the potential of OARs in the wider dissemination of their scholarly communication. Africa has the second-largest population in the world, and ought to generate more scholarly communication in the global space. To this end, therefore, the study recommends among others that African institutions should commit to establishing and maintaining OARs if African scholarly communication will be visible in the global space.
References
Abrahams, L. Burke, M., & Mouton, J. (2010). Research productivity-visibility-accessibility and scholarly communication in southern African universities. The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC), 10, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/19768
Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., & Kiran, K. (2010). Global visibility of Asian universities’ open access institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), 53–73. https://mjlis.um.edu.my/article/view/6942
Adewole-Odeshi, E., & Ezechukwu, O. C. (2020). An analytical study of open access institutional repositories in Nigerian universities. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3884/
Ali, S., Jan, S., & Amin, I. (2013). Status of Open Access Repositories: A Global Perspective. International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, 1(1). http://www.publishingindia.com/ijkmp/57/status-of-open-access-repositories-a-global-perspective/210/1591/
Cobcroft, K. (2024). UC Library Guides: Open Access Toolkit: What is Open Access? https://canberra.libguides.com/c.php?g=599341&p=4148764
Cordón-García, J.-A., Alonso-Arévalo, J., Gómez-Díaz, R., & Linder, D. (2013). Open access eBooks. In J.-A. Cordón-García, J. Alonso-Arévalo, R. Gómez-Díaz, & D. Linder (Eds.), Social Reading (pp. 121–141). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-726-2.50004-5
Ejikeme, A. N., & Ezema, I. J. (2019). The Potentials of open access initiative and the development of institutional repositories in Nigeria: Implications for scholarly communication. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35, 6–21. SpringerLink. https://link.spinger.com/article/10.1007/s12109-018-09626-4
Ezema, I. J.& Onyancha, O. B. (2017). Open access publishing in Africa: advancing research outputs to global visibility. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 27(2). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/164661
Igwe, K. N. (2014). Open Access Repositories in Academic and Research Institutions for the Realization of Nigeria’s Vision 20: 2020. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 12(1), 33–46. https://ijism.isc.ac/article_698200_7ed22a39e74acc03b87a91a09c6b0595.pdf
Islam, M. A., & Akter, R. (2013). Institutional Repositories and Open Access Initiatives in Bangladesh: A New Paradigm of Scholarly Communication. Liber Quarterly, 23(1), 3–24. https://liberquarterly.eu/article/view/10646
Li, Y., & Banach, M. (2011). Institutional repositories and digital preservation: accessing current practices at Research libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 17(5/6). https://www.dlib.org/dlib/may11/yuanli/05yuanli.html
Loan, F. A., & Sheikh, S. (2016). Analytical study of open access health and medical repositories. The Electronic Library, 34(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2015-0012
Luo, A. (2023). Content Analysis | Guide, Methods & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/content-analysis/
Madan, S., Ramesh, K., Gireesh Kumar, T. K., & Kunwar, S. (2020). Global Visibility of Open Access Institutional Repositories of SAARC Countries: An Explorative Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 4451, 1–18. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4451
Masenya, T. M. (2021). Trustworthiness of institutional repositories in academic libraries in South Africa. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5160. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5160
Open Access Repositories. (2012, January 10). UCSB Library. https://www.library.ucsb.edu/scholarly-communication/open-access-repositories
Open Access Repositories. (2022, December 19). https://open-access.network/en/information/publishing/repositories
Saikia, S., Verma, N.K., & Verma, M. K. (2023). Growth and development of Open Access Repositories across the globe: A case study of Open DOAR. In R. Kumar, M. K. Sinha, K. P. Singh, M. Ganjoo, S. Vashist, & K. Choudhary (Eds.). Recent Trends in Academic Libraries: Systems and Services (pp. 440–448). Book Age publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373302972_Growth_and_development_of_Open_Access_Repositories_across_the_globe_A_case_study_of_Open_DOAR
Trotter, H., Kell, C. Willmers, M., Gray, E., Mchombu, K., & King, T. (2014). Scholarly Communication at the University of Namibia: Case Study Report. Scholarly Communication in Africa Programme. https://repository.unam.edu.na/bitstream/handle/11070/1288/Trotter_scholarly_2014.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2014). Guide to Institutional Repository Software: A comparison of the five most widely adopted IR platforms: Digital Commons, Dspace, Eprints, Fedora, and Islandora. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000227115/PDF/227115eng.pdf.multi
Velmurugan, C., & Radhakrishnan, N. (2014). Institutional Repositories Software for Digital Libraries in the Digital Environment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Consortium, 1(3), 127–135. Modern Rohini Education Society. http://ijmc.rtmonline.in
Wani, Z.A., Gul, S., & Rah, J. A. (2009). Open Access Repositories: A Global Perspective with an Emphasis on Asia. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 27. 1–13. http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl27WGR.pdf
Xie, I., & Matusiak, K. K. (2016a). Chapter 1—Introduction to digital libraries. In I. Xie & K. K. Matusiak (Eds.), Discover Digital Libraries (pp. 1–35). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417112-1.00001-6
Xie, I., & Matusiak, K. K. (2016b). Chapter 6—Digital library management systems. In I. Xie, & K. K. Matusiak (Eds.), Discover Digital Libraries (pp. 171–203). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417112-1.00006-5
Xie, I., & Matusiak, K. K. (2016c). Chapter 9—Digital preservation. In I. Xie & K. K. Matusiak (Eds.), Discover Digital Libraries (pp. 255–279). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417112-1.00009-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 the Provincial Public Library - the Copernicus Library in Torun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors sign the license agreement, where authors have copyright but license exclusive rights in their article to the publisher. In this case authors have a range of rights, including:
- The right to share or reuse their article in the same ways permitted to third parties under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Following it, the author can "copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms."
- Authors retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
- Authors receive proper attribution and credit for the published work.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 69
Number of citations: 0