Traditional Surveys Versus Digital Surveys: Perspectives of Library and Information Science Researchers on Best Method for Data Collection in Research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/FT.2025.001

Keywords

Traditional surveys, Digital surveys, LIS research, Data collection methods, Nigeria

Abstract

Aims: This study examined the preferences of Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers in Nigeria regarding traditional (paper-based) versus digital (online) survey methods for data collection in research. The primary aim was to assess the perceived advantages, drawbacks, contextual influences, and practical challenges associated with both survey methodologies.

Method: A mixed-method research design was employed, involving quantitative data from structured questionnaires and qualitative insights from open-ended responses. The study utilized convenience sampling techniques, targeting LIS researchers across Nigerian universities through the NALISE WhatsApp platform. Data were collected via Google Forms and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: Findings revealed a slight preference for digital surveys (53.2%) over traditional surveys (46.8%), largely due to the benefits such as time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, broader reach, and enhanced data analysis capabilities. However, traditional surveys were preferred for their data accuracy and ease of administration in low-tech contexts. Key factors influencing researchers’ preferences included researcher expertise, population characteristics, time constraints, and technological infrastructure. Major challenges identified were difficulties in ensuring data quality, limited access to technology, and insufficient training in survey design. Despite the promise of digital surveys, representativeness, technical issues, and ethical concerns persist.

Conclusion: The studyconcluded that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to survey methodology. While digital tools offer significant operational advantages, they must be balanced against contextual limitations such as digital divides, technical capacity, and representativeness. Traditional methods retain value, especially where trust, accuracy, or accessibility is paramount. A hybrid or adaptive survey approach, supported by institutional training, technological investment, and ethical oversight, is recommended to optimize research effectiveness and inclusiveness in the Nigerian LIS context.

Author Biographies

Bolaji David Oladokun, Federal University of Technology, Ikot Abasi, Akwa Ibom, Nigeria

Bolaji David Oladokun is a Lecturer at the Department of Library and Information Technology, Federal University of Technology, Ikot Abasi, Akwa Ibom State of Nigeria. He holds a First-Class degree in Library and Information Science and a Diploma in Mass Communication with distinction. He also has a Master’s degree in Library and Information Science from Ignatius Ajuru University of Education in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, where he graduated with distinction. He is also a Certified Librarian in Nigeria (CLN) and a Nigerian Library Association (NLA) member as well as a member of the Nigerian Association of Library and Information Science Educators (NALISE) and the Association for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T). He has authored over 150 articles published in accredited journals, conference proceedings, and book chapters. He also has three books to his credit in the library and information science field. He can be contacted at: Bolaji.oladokun@yahoo.com

Yusuf Ayodeji Ajani, University of Abuja, The Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria

Yusuf Ayodeji Ajani is a Lecturer of 2 level at the Department of Library and Information Science, University of Abuja, FCT, Nigeria, and a postgraduate student at the Department of Library and Information Science, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria. He has an impressive publication record, with over 70 articles published in renowned local and international journals in the field of Education and Librarianship. In 2023, he received the esteemed Emerald Literati Award in recognition of his contributions to scholarly research. For inquiries and potential collaborations, please contact Ayodeji at yusuf.ajani@uniabuja.edu.ng.

Adeyinka Tella, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria/University of South Africa, Pretoria, the Republic of South Africa

Adeyinka Tella is a distinguished scholar affiliated with the Department of Library and Information Science at the University of Ilorin, Nigeria, and serves as a research fellow at the Department of Information Science, University of South Africa, Pretoria. He has an impressive academic portfolio, with over 300 articles published in renowned local and international journals in the field of librarianship. In recognition of his outstanding research contributions, Tella was awarded the prestigious Emerald Literati Award in 2023. He also holds a C2 rating as a researcher, conferred by the National Research Foundation of South Africa. Known for his collaborative spirit, Tella is approachable and open to partnerships across various disciplines (tellayinkaedu@yahoo.com).

References

Boyer, K. K., Olson, J. R., Calantone, R. J., & Jackson, E. C. (2002). Print versus electronic surveys: A comparison of two data collection methodologies. Journal of Operations Management, 20(4), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00004-9

Carrera-Hernández, J. J., Levresse, G., & Lacan, P. (2020). Is UAV-SfM surveying ready to replace traditional surveying techniques? International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(12), 4820–4837. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1727049

Dolch C., & Zawacki-Richter O. (2018). Are students getting used to learning technology? Changing media usage patterns of traditional and non-traditional students in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 26. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2038

Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2018). The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead. Internet Research, 28(4), 854–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089

Fang, H., Xian, R., Ma, Z., Lu, M., & Hu, Y. (2021). Comparison of the differences between web-based and traditional questionnaire surveys in pediatrics: Comparative survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(8), e30861. https://doi.org/10.2196/30861

Fricker, R. D. (2008). Sampling methods for web and e-mail surveys. In N. Fielding (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 195-216). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055.n11

Hays, R. D., Liu, H., & Kapteyn, A. (2015). Use of Internet panels to conduct surveys. Behavior Research Methods, 47(3), 685–690. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0617-9

López-Chila, R., Llerena-Izquierdo, J., & Sumba-Nacipucha, N. (2021). Using examview to create questionnaires for online evaluation in VLEs. 2021 Second International Conference on Information Systems and Software Technologies (ICI2ST), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICI2ST51859.2021.00009

Lowry, P. B., D’Arcy, J., Hammer, B., & Moody, G. D. (2016). “Cargo Cult” science in traditional organization and information systems survey research: A case for using nontraditional methods of data collection, including Mechanical Turk and online panels. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(3), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2016.06.002

Mutepfa, M. M., & Tapera, R. (2019). Traditional survey and questionnaire platforms. In P. Liamputtong (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (s. 541–558). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_89

Nayak, S. D. P., & Narayan, K. A. (2019). Strengths and weaknesses of online surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR-JHSS), 24(5), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2405053138

Opara, V., Spangsdorf, S., & Ryan, M. K. (2023). Reflecting on the use of Google Docs for online interviews: Innovation in qualitative data collection. Qualitative Research, 23(3), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211045192

Pathiravasan, C. H., Zhang, Y., Trinquart, L., Benjamin, E. J., Borrelli, B., McManus, D. D., Kheterpal, V., Lin, H., Sardana, M., Hammond, M. M., Spartano, N. L., Dunn, A. L., Schramm, E., Nowak, C., Manders, E. S., Liu, H., Kornej, J., Liu, C., & Murabito, J. M. (2021). Adherence of mobile app-based surveys and comparison with traditional surveys: eCohort Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e24773. https://doi.org/10.2196/24773

Reveilhac, M., Steinmetz, S., & Morselli, D. (2022). A systematic literature review of how and whether social media data can complement traditional survey data to study public opinion. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(7), 10107–10142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12101-0

Roecker, S. M., Howell, D. W., Haydu-Houdeshell, C. A., & Blinn, C. (2010). A qualitative comparison of conventional soil survey and digital soil mapping approaches. In J. L. Boettinger, D. W. Howell, A. C. Moore, A. E. Hartemink, & S. Kienast-Brown (Eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: Bridging Research, Environmental Application, and Operation (s. 369–384). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8863-5_29

Tella, A. (2015). Electronic and paper based data collection methods in library and information science research: A comparative analyses. New Library World, 116(9/10), 588-609.https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-12-2014-0138

Toepoel, V. (2017). Online survey design. In Online research methods (pp. 184-202). SAGE.

Zhang, Y. (2000), Using the Internet for survey research: A case study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 51: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:1<57::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-W

Folia Toruniensia

Downloads

Published

2025-11-04

How to Cite

Oladokun, B., Ajani, Y., & Tella, A. (2025). Traditional Surveys Versus Digital Surveys: Perspectives of Library and Information Science Researchers on Best Method for Data Collection in Research. Folia Toruniensia, 25, 13–37. https://doi.org/10.12775/FT.2025.001

Issue

Vol. 25 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 the Provincial Public Library - the Copernicus Library in Torun

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors sign the license agreement, where authors have copyright but license exclusive rights in their article to the publisher. In this case authors have a range of rights, including:

  • The right to share or reuse their article in the same ways permitted to third parties under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Following it, the author can "copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms."
  • Authors retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
  • Authors receive proper attribution and credit for the published work.
 

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 167
Number of citations: 0