The Rhetorical Invention of the Argument in the Epistle of Jude 5-10

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/BPTh.2024.019

Keywords

Jude 5-10, rhetorical invention, epicheirema, God's judgment, impiety

Abstract

This article aims to demonstrate the rhetorical status of the matter and the inventiveness supporting one piece of evidence (vv. 5–10) in the persuasive argumentation of the Epistle of Jude.

The specific logical structure of this proof suggests the complex status of the issue raised by the author. The analysis of the rhetorical structure of this proof and the assessment of its main persuasive features lead to conclusions indicating the purpose of this proof – preparing recipients to make the right choice, teaching what impiety is and how it manifests itself, and explaining the complex state of the matter (presumption, definition, value assessment).

References

Bauckham, Richard. 1983. Jude. 2 Peter. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

Bauckham, Richard. 1990. Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church. Edinburgh: Clark.

Brosend, William F. 2004. James and Jude. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Charles, Daryl. 1990. “‘Those’ and ‘These’: the Use of the Old Testament in the Epistle of Jude”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 38: 109-124.

Charles, Daryl. 1993. Literary Strategy in the Epistle of Jude. Scranton: University of Scranton Press – London: Associated University Presses.

Davids, Peter H. 2006. The Letters of 2 Peter and Jude. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans – Nottingham: Apollos.

Desjardins, Michel. 1987. “The Portrayal of the Dissidents in 2 Peter and Jude: Does It Tell Us More About the ‘Godly’ than ‘Ungodly’”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 30: 89-102.

Drawnel, Henryk. 2012. “Knowledge Transmission in the Context of the Watchers’ Sexual Sin with the Woman in 1 Enoch 6-11”. Biblical Annals 2, no.1: 123-151.

Green, Gene L. 2008. Jude and 2 Peter. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.

Harrington, Daniel. J. 2003. Jude and 2 Peter. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.

Joubert, Stephan J. 1998. “Transtextual Relationships and Historical Understanding in the Letter of Jude”. Biblische Zeitschrift 42: 56-70.

Mickiewicz, Franciszek. 2018. List św. Judy. Drugi List św. Piotra. Wstęp, przekład z oryginału, komentarz. Częstochowa: Edycja św. Pawła.

Moo, Douglas G. 1996. 2 Peter and Jude. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

Muszytowska, Dorota. 2020. “The Meaning of the Motif of Michael the Archangel’s Dispute with the Devil (Jude 9). A Socio-Rhetorical Perspective”. Biblical Annals 10, no.4: 677-706.

Neyrey, Jerome H. 1993. 2 Peter, Jude. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Nickelsburg, Georg W. E. 2001. 1 Enoch 1. A Commentary on the Book of 1 Enoch, Chapters 1-13; 81-108. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Reicke, Bo. The Epistles of James, Peter, and Jude. Introduction, Translation, and Notes (The Anchor Bible 37). Garden City: Doubleday, 1964.

Reese, Ruth A. 2007. 2 Peter and Jude. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Tromp, Johannes. 1993. The Assumption of Moses. A Critical Edition with Commentary. Leiden: Brill.

Watson, Duane F. 1988. Invention, Arrangement, and Style: Rhetorical Criticism of Jude and 2 Peter. Atlanta: Scholars Press.

Webb, R. L., 2008. “The Use of ‘Story’ in the Letter of Jude: Rhetorical Strategies of Jude’s Narrative Episodes”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 31, no.1: 53–87.

Wojciechowska, Kalina, and Mariusz Rosik. 2021. A Structural Commentary on the So-Called ‘Antilegomena’. The Letter of Jude: Expecting Mercy. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht.

Wolthius, T. 1987. “Jude and Jewish Traditions”. Calvin Theological Journal.

Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia

Downloads

Published

2024-09-29

How to Cite

1.
MUSZYTOWSKA, Dorota. The Rhetorical Invention of the Argument in the Epistle of Jude 5-10. Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia. Online. 29 September 2024. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 363-380. [Accessed 31 January 2025]. DOI 10.12775/BPTh.2024.019.

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2024): Biblical Thomism X

Section

Varia

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Dorota Muszytowska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 76
Number of citations: 0