The Hard Problem of Consciousness in the Light of Onto-Gnoseological Uncertainty

Ekaterina Nikolaevna Gnatik, Sergey Alexandrovich Lokhov, Dmitry Valerievich Mamchenkov, Maria Petrovna Matyushova

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2018.013

Abstract


Purpose: The main purpose of this article is to show that the paradigm of viewing the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness in analytic philosophy makes it a pseudo-problem rather than a ‘hard problem’. The objectives of this research included showing the reasons for the authors’ thesis, demonstrating the irreducibility of consciousness as a special layer of reality, and proposing a way to overcome these difficulties.

Design/methodology/approach: In this article, the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness is viewed from the standpoints of the transcendental-phenomenological and dialectical approaches and is analyzed through the prism of the principle of onto-gnoseological uncertainty.

Findings: It is shown that the way of formulating the ‘hard problem’ in the analytical philosophical tradition inevitably makes it a pseudo-problem. At the same time, with the consistent realization of the principle of onto-gnoseological uncertainty, the antinomy of solutions to the problems of consciousness is eliminated, which opens up a way to a productive solution of problems related to the interpretation of consciousness both in natural sciences and in philosophy.

Originality/value: This research reveals the methodological potential of applying the principle of onto-gnoseological uncertainty to the problems that arise in modern philosophy in connection with the achievements of natural sciences.


Keywords


hard problem of consciousness; consciousness and brain; subjective reality; qualia; onto-gnoseological uncertainty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bielas, Jacek. 2017. “The View from Within the Brain: Does Neurofeedback Close the Gap?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (9–10): 133–155.

Carruthers, Glenn, Schier, Elizabeth. 2017a. “Introduction: The Hard Problem of Consciousness.” Topoi 36 (1): 1–3.

Carruthers, Glenn, Schier, Elizabeth. 2017b. “Why are We Still Being Hornswoggled? Dissolving the Hard Problem of Consciousness.” Topoi 36 (1): 67–79.

Chalmers, David. J. 1997. The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Littl Brown and Co.

Descartes, Rene. 1989. Writings in two volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow.

Dubrovsky, David I. 2012. “The Subjective Reality and the Brain. On the Question about the Half-Century Experience of Developing the ‘Hard Problem of Consciousness’ in Analytic Philosophy.” In Epistemology: Development Perspectives, by Lektorskiy, V.A., 229–273. Moscow: «Kanon+».

Hendry, Robin F. 2006. “Is There Downward Causation in Chemistry?” In Philosophy of Chemistry, by edited D. Baird et al., 173–191. Boston: Springer.

Horst, Steven. 2014. “Beyond Reduction: From Naturalism to Cognitive Pluralism.” Mind & Matter 12 (2): 197–244.

Kuznetsov, Anton V. 2014. “Cognitive Research and the Problem of Mental Causality.” Questions of Philosophy 3: 133–143.

Lamza, Lukas 2014. “Six Phases of Cosmic Chemistry.” Hyle – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 20 (1): 165–192.

Lebedev, Vladimir I. 2002. Psychology and Psycholpathology of Loneliness and Group Isolation. Moscow: Unity.

Mamchenkov, Dmitry V. 2014. Objectivity and Historicism. Moscow: RUDN.

Mamchenkov, Dmitry V. 2017. „The ‘Hard Problem’ in Analytic Philosophy.” Newsletter of RUDN. Series “Philosophy” 21 (2): 222–229.

McBride, Raymond. 2014. “Towards a Sublime State of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (11–12): 19–40.

McClelland, Tom. 2017. “The Problem of Consciousness: Easy, Hard or Tricky?” Topoi 36 (1): 17–30.

Mednikov, Boris M. 1982. Axioms of Biology. Moscow: Znanie.

Menon, Sangeetha. 2014. “Beginnings: Biological and Philosophical Accounts of Consciousness.” In Brain, Self and Consciousness, edited by S. Menon, 37–60. New Delhi: Springer.

Metlov, Vladimir I. 2003. „A Complex Approach to the Problem of Consciousness.” In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Philosophy of Consciousness: History and Modernity’’ dedicated to the memory of A.F. Gryaznov, Professor at Moscow State University (1948–2001), 247–250. Moscow: “Sovremennye Tetradi” Publishing House.

Naidysh, Viacheslav M. 2017. “Mythmaking in the Activity of Consciousness.” Questions of Philosophy 5: 26–35.

Russel, Bertran. 1999. Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Tomsk: Vodoley.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2002. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Moscow: TERRA-Book Club Republic.

Searle, John. 2002. A Re-Discovery of the Mind. Moscow: Idea-Press.

Smith, Cristopher U. M., Whitaker, Harry. 2014. Brain, mind and consciousness in the history of neuroscience. Dordrecht: Springer.

Smith, Roger. 2015. “History and the hard problem.” Metascience 24 (3): 413–416.

Smythies, John. 2017. “The Role of Brain Mechanisms in the Generation of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (1–2): 254–263.

Swaab, Dick. 2014. We are Our Brains: From the Womb to Alzheimer's. St. Petersburg: Ivan Limbakh Publishing House.

Tegmark, Max. 2015. “Consciousness as a State of Matter.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 76: 238–270.

Tsou, Jonathan Y. 2013. “Origins of the Qualitative Aspects of Consciousness: Evolutionary Answers to Chalmers’ Hard Problem.” In Origins of Mind, edited by Liz Swan, 259–269. Dordrecht: Springer.

Varkhotov, Taras A. 2003. “Cartesian Anthropology as the Epistemological Framework of Modern Philosophy of Consciousness.” In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Philosophy of Consciousness: History and Modernity’’ dedicated to the memory of A.F. Gryaznov, Professor at Moscow State University (1948–2001), 30–41. Moscow: “Sovremennye Tetradi” Publishing House.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1994. “Philosophical Studies.” In Philosophical Works. Moscow: Gnosis.








ISSN 2300-7648 (print)
ISSN 2353-5636 (online)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism