Oracles, Prophets and the Exoteric Circles of Science and Religion

Jaume Navarro

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2016.030

Abstract


Drawing upon Karl Giberson and Mariano Artigas’ joint book The Oracles of Science, I discuss the limits of an emphasis on so-called philosophical bridges in the relationship between science and religion. Epistemological and metaphysical analyses of the claims by scientists and religious people are indeed necessary to avoid illegitimate extrapolations; but a clear separation between scientific and religious statements is problematic. Following Ludwig Fleck’s characterisation of the esoteric and the exoteric circles of science, I argue that popularization of science is always embedded in scientific cultures and ideological agendas and that one cannot expect a clear demarcation criterion between pure science and pure popularization. I also consider Lyda Walsh’s rhetorical analysis of the scientists as prophets to understand the oracles’ public portrayal of science in pseudo-religious terms.

Keywords


Popularization of science; Mariano Artigas; Ludwig Fleck; science and religion; demarcation criteria; conflict thesis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barton, R. 1998. “'Huxley, Lubbock, and Half a Dozen Others’. Professionals and Gentlemen in the Formation of the X Club, 1851–1864”. ISIS, 89: 440–444.

Cunningham, A., and P. Williams. 1993. “De-centering the Big Picture: The origins of modern science and the modern origins of science.” British Journal for the History of Science 26:407–432.

Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2007. Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Dawkins, R. 1998. “Postmodernism disrobed.” Nature 394:141–143.

Fleck, L. 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Originally published as Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv (Basel: Benno Schwabe und Co., 1935).

Giberson, K., y Artigas, M. 2007. Oracles of Science. Celebrity Scientist versus God and Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Giberson, Karl 2011. “When Science becomes Religion”, in Navarro, Jaume, ed., Science and Faith within Reason. Reality, Creation, Life and Design, (Farnham: Ashgate) 205—220.

Harrison, P. 2006. “‘Science’ and ‘Religion’: Constructing the boundaries.” The Journal of Religion 86:81–106.

Harrison, P. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Levitt, P., and N. Gross. 1994. Higher Superstition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Murillo, L. 1901. “La ciencia libre y la Revelación.” Razón y Fe 1:6–22.

Nieto-Galan, A. 2016. Science in the Public Sphere A history of lay knowledge and expertise. London: Routledge. Originally published as Los públicos de la ciencia. Expertos y profanos a través de la historia (Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2011).

Pius IX. 1870. Dei Filius. Last accessed June 21st. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds2.v.ii.i.html

Sanz de Diego, R. M. 1998. “Una aportación regeneracionista de los jesuitas españoles: La revista Razón y Fe (1901).” Anuario Filosófico 31/1:147–177.

Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sokal, A. 1996. “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.” Social Text 46:215–252.

Sokal, A., and J. Bricmont. 1997. Impostures Intellectuelles. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.

Stanley, M. 2015. “Huxley’s Church and Maxwell’s Demon. From Theistic Science to Naturalistic Science.” Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Topham, J. 1992. “Science and Popular Education in the 1830s: The Role of the Bridgewater Treatises.” British Journal for the History of Science 25:397–430.

Turner, F. M. 1974. Between science and religion: The reaction to scientific naturalism in late Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Turner, F. 1978. “The Victorian conflict between science and religion: A professional dimension.” Isis 69:356–376.

Walsh, L. 2013. Scientists as Prophets. A Rhetorical Genealogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.








ISSN 2300-7648 (print)
ISSN 2353-5636 (online)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism