Damaris Masham, Ralph Cudworth and John Locke: Some Philosophical Continuities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2021.013Słowa kluczowe
Damaris Masham, Ralph Cudworth, John Locke, PlatonismAbstrakt
In this paper, I focus on Damaris Masham, to re-consider the relationship of her philosophy to the two philosophers with whom she was most closely associated: John Locke, and her father, the Cambridge Platonist, Ralph Cudworth. After considering some of the problems of interpretation which have arisen in scholarly debates, I focus her Occasional Thoughts to highlight continuities with both Locke and Cudworth in her epistemology, moral philosophy and metaphysics. I argue these show that Damaris Masham’s philosophy does not fit the received categories of empiricist or rationalist of the dominant narrative. Her position requires us to reconsider not just the relationship of her philosophy to that of Cudworth and Locke, but also of the relationship of Cudworth and Locke. Ultimately, therefore, reintegrating women into the history of philosophy challenges us to rethink standard narratives of the history of philosophy.
Bibliografia
Broad Jacqueline. 2020. Women Philosophers of Seventeenth-Century England: Selected Correspondence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cudworth Ralph. 1678. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London.
Cudworth Ralph. 1996. A Treatise concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality and A Treatise of Freewill, ed. Sarah Hutton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 1960. vol. III, ed. C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin: Georg Olms Hildesheim.
Locke John. 1976–1989. The Correspondence of John Locke, 8 Volumes, ed. E. S. de Beer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Locke John. 1975. An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Masham Damaris. 1695. A Discourse Concerning the Love of God. London.
Masham Damaris. 1705. Occasional Thoughts in Reference to a Vertuous or Christian Life. London.
More Henry. 1662. A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings. London.
Studies
Acworth Richard. 2006. “Cursory reflections upon an article called ‘What is it with Damaris, Lady Masham?’”. Locke Studies 5: 179-197.
Broad Jacqueline. 2002. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Broad Jacqueline. 2003. “Adversaries or Allies? Occasional Thoughts on the Masham-Astell Exchange”. Eighteenth-Century Thought 1: 123-149.
Broad Jaqueline. 2006. “A Woman’s Influence? John Locke and Damaris Masham on Moral Accountability”. Journal of the History of Ideas: 489-490.
Buickerood James G. 2005. “What is it with Damaris, Lady Masham? The Historiography of one early modern woman philosopher”. Locke Studies. An Annual Journal of Locke Research 5: 179–214.
Gill Michael B. 2010. ”From Cambridge Platonism to Scottish Sentimentalism’”, The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 8: 13–31.
Goldie Mark. 2007. “Mary Astell and John Locke”. In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, eds. William Kolbrener, Michal Michelson. New York: Routledge.
Hammou Philippe. 2008. “Enthousiasme et Nature Humaine: à propos d’une Lettre de Locke à Damaris Cudworth”. Revue de Métaphysique et Morale 3: 337-350.
Hutton Sarah. 1993. “Damaris Cudworth, Lady Masham: Between Platonism and Enlightenment”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1, 1: 29-54.
Hutton Sarah. 2013. “Religion and Women’s Letters: Anne Conway and Damaris Masham”. In Debating the Faith Religion and Letter-Writing in Great Britain, 1550-1800, eds. Anne Dunan-Page, Clotilde Prunier. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hutton Sarah. 2015. “‘Blue-eyed Philosophers Born on Wednesdays’: An Essay on Women and History of Philosophy”. The Monist 98, 1.
Hutton Sarah. 2020. “Lady Damaris Masham”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/lady-masham/.
Hutton Sarah, 2021, “Ralph Cudworth”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/cudworth/>
Lascano Marcy B. 2011. “Damaris Masham and ‘The Law of Reason or Nature’”. The Modern Schoolman 88, 3-4: 245-265.
Lascano Marcy B. 2018. “‘Heads Cast in Metahysical Moulds’. Damaris Masham on the Method and Nature of Metaphysics”, 1-27. In Early Modern Women on Metaphysics, ed. Emily Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leisinger Matthew A. 2019. “The Inner Work of Liberty: Cudworth on Desire and Attention”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27, 5: 649-667.
Nuovo Victor. 2011. Christianity, Antiquity, and Enlightenment: Interpretations of Locke. Dordrecht: Springer.
Phemister Pauline. 2004. “‘All the Time and Everywhere Everything’s the Same as Here’: The Principle of Uniformity in the Correspondence Between Leibniz and Lady Masham”. In Leibniz and His Correspondents, ed. Paul Lodge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosa Susan. 1994. “Ralph Cudworth in the République des Lettres: The Controversy about Plastick Nature and the Reputation of Pierre Bayle”. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 23: 157-160.
Shapiro Lisa. 2004. “The Place of Women in Early Modern Philosophy”. In Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy, ed. Lilli Alanen, Charlotte Witt. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Simonutti Luisa. 1993. “Bayle and Leclerc as Readers of Cudworth. Elements of the Debates on Plastic Nature in Dutch Learned Journals”. Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte in Nederland 40: 147-165.
Sleigh Robert. 2005. “Reflections on the Masham-Leibniz Correspondence”. In Early Modern Philosophy. Mind, Matter and Metaphysics, ed. Christia Mercer, Eileen O’Neill, 119-126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Springborg Patricia. 2005. Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom from Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whyman Susan. 2004. “The Correspondence of Esther Masham and John Locke: a study in epistolary silences”. Huntington Library Quarterly 66, 3, 4: 275-305.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 765
Liczba cytowań: 0