Zum Inhalt springen Zur Hauptnavigation springen Zur Fußzeile springen
  • Registrieren
  • Einloggen
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Aktuelle Ausgabe
  • Archiv
  • Über uns
    • Über die Zeitschrift
    • Beitragseinreichung
    • Redaktion
    • Schutz personenbezogener Daten
    • Kontakt
  • Registrieren
  • Einloggen
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Język Polski

Studia z Historii Filozofii

The Reception of "De Rerum Natura" in the Poetry of Madame Deshoulières
  • Home
  • /
  • The Reception of "De Rerum Natura" in the Poetry of Madame Deshoulières
  1. Home /
  2. Archiv /
  3. Bd. 12 Nr. 3 (2021): Modern Women Philosophers: Biographies, Works, and Views /
  4. ARTYKUŁY

The Reception of "De Rerum Natura" in the Poetry of Madame Deshoulières

Autor/innen

  • Lacey Giles Kings College London https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-543X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2021.015

Schlagworte

Philosophy, poetry, France, philosophe, salonnière, salon, Deshoulières, Epicureanism, Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, ataraxia, aponia, equanimity, naturalism, material causation, deism, immortality, Atomism, women, gender, querelles des femmes

Abstract

This paper explores Antoinette Du Ligier de la Garde Deshoulières’ philosophical poetry in context.  The presentation of Epicureanism in various works, including Imitation de Lucrèce, her maximes, and idylls is analysed, considering both format and content choices and focusing on the ways in which both were used subversively. Her reception of Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura, as well as her social and political context inform this analysis. The challenges and limitations of producing work from the interstices of several conflicting identities are included to posit her case as an example of why women are under-represented in the history of philosophy.

Literaturhinweise

Adam Antoine. 1964. Les Libertins au XVIIe Siècle. Paris.

Angot E. 1920. Mme Deshoulières et l'intrigue de Rocroy’. Revue d'Histoire littéraire de la France, 27e Année 3: 371-393.

Asmis Elizabeth. 1983. “Rhetoric and Reason in Lucretius”. The American Journal of Philology 104: 36-66.

Asse E. 1892. “Des Houlières”. In La Grande Encyclopédie, inventaire raisonné des sciences, lettres, et des arts, ed. H. Lamirault, 14: 238-239. Paris.

Bardon Henry. 1964. “L'obstacle: métaphore et comparaison en latin”. Latomus 23: 3-20.

Bayle Pierre. 1820. Dictionnaire historique et critique. T. VIII. Paris. Retrieved from ark:/12148/bpt6k50440b, 4 April 2021.

Brunetière Ferdinand. 1892. “Étude sur le XVIIe siècle: I. La formation de l’idée de progress”. Revue des Deux Mondes 13: 881-920.

Brunel Pierre. 1987. “La fin de l'idylle”. Revue d'Histoire littéraire de la France, 87e Année 2: 200-212.

Butterfield David. 2015. “Lucretius in the Early Modern Period”. In Lucretius and the Early Modern, eds. David Norbrook, S. J. Harrison, Philip R. Hardie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caradonna Jeremy L. 2012. The Enlightenment in Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Case S. J. 1915. “The Religion of Lucretius”. The American Journal of Theology 19: 92-107.

Chométy Philippe, Michèle Rosellini. 2017. Traduire Lucrèce: Pour une histoire de la réception française du De rerum natura (XVIe-XVIIIe siècle). Paris.

Clay Diskin. 1983. Lucretius and Epicurus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Conley John. 2002. The Suspicion of Virtue: Women Philosophers in Neoclassical France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Conley John. 2006. “Suppressing Women Philosophers: The Case of the Early Modern Canon”. Early Modern Women 1: 99-114.

Conley John. 2019. “Tutor, Salon, Convent: the formation of women philosophers in early modern France”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27: 786-805.

Cousin Victor. 1844. “Les femmes illustres du dix-septième siècle”. Revue des Deux Mondes, Nouvelle Série 5: 193-203.

Cousin Victor. 1854. La Marquise de Sablé. Paris.

De Latour Antoine de. 1835. “Anciens Poètes Francais. II. Racan”. Revue des Deux Mondes 1: 523-548.

Deshoulières Antoinette, Antoinette-Thérèse Deshoulières. 1810. Oeuvres de Madame et de Mademoiselle Deshoulières. Tome 1. Paris. Retrieved from ark:/12148/bpt6k205589g, 30 January 2021.

Deshoulières Antoinette. 1798. Oeuvres de Madame des Houlières. Tome 2. Nouvelle édition, dédiée au sexe amateur de la poésie agréable. Paris. Retrieved from ark:/12148/bpt6k58219568, 30 January 2021.

Deshoulières Antoinette. 1882. Oeuvres choisies de Mme Des Houllières. Adolphe Mathurin de Lescure ed. Paris. Retrieved from ark:/12148/bpt6k2037024, 30 January 2021.

Durazzo C. 1838. “Madame Deshoulières. Madame de la Fayette. (An essay on their works and style)”. In Les Classiques et les Romantiques, eds. C. Martin, L. Bescherelle. Paris.

Gain David B. 1969. “The Life and Death of Lucretius”. Latomus 28: 545-553.

Gale Monica. 2001. Lucretius and the Didactic Epic. London: Bristol Classical Press.

Gale Monica (ed.). 2007. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Lucretius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Godwin John. 2004. Lucretius. London: Bloomsbury.

Guidarelli Vincenza. 1979. The Salon of Madame de Sablé: Foyer of Literary Jansenism. Unpublished dissertation, Fordham University.

Haase-Dubosc Danielle. 2001. “Intellectuelles, femmes d'esprit et femmes savantes au XVIIe siècle”. Clio 13: 43-67.

Hardie Philip. 2009. Lucretian Receptions: History, The Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hémon-Fabre Catherine. 2005. “Étude Historique et littéraire”. In L’enchantement des chagrins: poesies completes, eds. Catherine Hémon-Fabre, Pierre-Eugène LeRoy. Paris.

James P. 1998. “Médecine à Molière”. Vesalius 4: 35-41.

Kelly Joan. 1982. “Early Feminist Theory and the ‘Querelle des Femmes’, 1400-1789”. Signs 8: 4-28.

Koenen Mieke. 2004. “Loca loquuntur. Lucretius’ Explanation of the Echo and Other Acoustic Phenomena in DRN 4.563-614”. Mnemosyne 57: 698-724.

Kostroun Daniella. 2011. “La Querelle des femmes au cœur du jansénisme”. Histoire, Économie Et Société 30: 47-61.

La Charité Claude, Roxanne Roy. 2012. Femmes, rhétorique et éloquence sous l’ancien régime. Saint Étienne.

La Vopa Anthony. 2010. “Sexless Minds at Work and at Play: Poullain de la Barre and the Origins of Early Modern Feminism”. Representations 109: 57-94.

Lachèvre Frédéric (ed.). 1924. Les Derniers Libertins. Paris.

Lampron Véronique. 2008. “Les représentation genrée de l'élite française selon les anti-philosophes: Le cas des conseils de lecture à la fin du XVIIIe siècle”. Proquest Dissertations and Theses 88. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/304384608?accountid=14511, 29 June 2019.

LeGuay Pierre. 1965. “Des Houlières”, 1388-1389. In Dictionnaire de biographie française, ed. Roman D’Amat. Paris: Letouzey et Ané.

Lezra Jacques, Liza Blake. 2016. Lucretius and Modernity: Epicurean Encounters Across Time and Disciplines. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mommsen Theodor. 1886. The History of Rome Vol. 5, trans. William P. Dickson. London: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Niderst Alain. 1978. “Jean Henault (Suite)”. Revue d'Histoire littéraire de la France, 78e Année 5: 707-721.

Paliyenko Adrianna M. 2016. Genius Envy: Women Shaping French Poetic History, 1801-1900. University Park: Penn State University Press.

Pekacz Jolanta T. 1999. “The Salonnières and the Philosophes in Old Regime France: The Authority of Aesthetic Judgment”. Journal of the History of Ideas 60: 277-297.

Pintard René. 1972. “Un ami mal connu de Molière: Jean de Henault”. Revue d'Histoire littéraire de la France, 72e Année 5/6: 954-975.

Roche Daniel. 1989. “Sociabilités et politique de l'Ancien Régime à la Révolution”. French Politics and Society 7: 7-13.

Rouse William Henry Denham. 1924. Lucretius. On the Nature of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sainte-Beuve Charles Augustin. 1886. Portrait des femmes. Paris.

Solomon Daniel. 2004. “‘Lucretius’ Progressive Revelation of Nature in ‘DRN’ 1.149-502”. Phoenix 58: 260-283.

Somaize Antoine Baudeau de. 1661. Le grand dictionnaire des pretieuses. Paris.

Soriano Marc. 1973. “Un Conte À Plusieurs Voix”. MLN 88: 659-671.

Storer Mary Elizabeth. 1935. “Information Furnished by the Mercure Galant on the French Provincial Academies in the Seventeenth Century”. PMLA 50: 444-468.

Tebben Maryann. 1999. “Speaking of Women: Molière and Conversation at the Court of Louis XIV”. Modern Language Studies 29: 189-207.

Toinet Raymond. 1918. “Les écrivains moralistes au XVI-Ie siècle (Suite)”. Revue d'Histoire littéraire de la France, 25e Année 2: 310-320.

Waithe Mary Ellen. 2004. “Canon Fodder: New Works by and about Women Philosophers”. Hypatia 19: 134-149.

West David. 1969. The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Studia z Historii Filozofii

Downloads

  • pdf (English)

Veröffentlicht

2021-12-14

Zitationsvorschlag

1.
GILES, Lacey. The Reception of "De Rerum Natura" in the Poetry of Madame Deshoulières. Studia z Historii Filozofii. Online. 14 Dezember 2021. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 61-95. [Accessed 8 Dezember 2025]. DOI 10.12775/szhf.2021.015.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Bibliografische Angaben herunterladen
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Ausgabe

Bd. 12 Nr. 3 (2021): Modern Women Philosophers: Biographies, Works, and Views

Rubrik

ARTYKUŁY

Lizenz

Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1287
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Autor/innenverzeichnis durchblättern
  • Issue archive

User

User

Aktuelle Ausgabe

  • Atom-Logo
  • RSS2-Logo
  • RSS1-Logo

Informationen

  • Für Leser/innen
  • Für Autor/innen
  • Für Bibliothekar/innen

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Sprache

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Philosophy, poetry, France, philosophe, salonnière, salon, Deshoulières, Epicureanism, Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, ataraxia, aponia, equanimity, naturalism, material causation, deism, immortality, Atomism, women, gender, querelles des femmes
Aufwärts

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop