Mary Astell on the Social Nature of the Cartesian Passions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2021.014Keywords
Mary Astell, Embodiment, PassionsAbstract
Scholars have long recognised that Mary Astell builds her feminist critique of society on a foundation of Cartesian views about human nature and the passions. At the same time, the full extent of the influence of Descartes’ view of embodiment on the solution Astell proposes in her Serious Proposal to the Ladies is only beginning to come to light. In this paper, I contribute to this ongoing project by arguing that Astell builds on Descartes’ ideas by addressing a blind spot in his view, namely, that that the embodied self is socially situated, and that therefore, our social context plays a crucial formative role in the development of our passions. In doing so, I show Astell extends Cartesian philosophy beyond an egalitarian feminist critique of society, but also to a positive political theory offering a solution to the problems she identifies. Thusly, Astell shows the political potential of Cartesian philosophy as a framework for social critique and to seek solutions to the problems such a critique can bring out.
References
Adam Charles, Tannery Paul (eds.). 1996. Oeuvres de Descartes (11 vols.). Paris: J. Vrin.
Ahearn Kathleen A. 2016. “Mary Astell’s Account of Feminine Self-Esteem”. In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, eds. Alice Sowaal, Penny A. Weiss. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Arnauld Antoine, Nicole Pierre. 1996. Logic, or the Art of Thinking, transl. and ed. Jill V. Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Astell Mary. 2013. The Christian Religion, as Professed by a Daughter of the Church of England, ed. Jacqueline Broad. Toronto: Center for Reformation and Renaissance Studies.
Astell Mary. 2002. A Serious Proposal to the Ladies. parts I and II, ed. P. Springborg. Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts.
Atherton Margaret. 1993. Cartesian Reason and Gendered Reason. In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, eds. Louise M. Antony, Charlotte Witt, 472-493. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press.
Brassfield Shoshana. 2012. Never Let the Passions be Your Guide: Descartes and the Role of the Passions. British Journal of the History of Philosophy 20, 3: 459-477.
Broad Jacqueline. 2002. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Broad Jacqueline. 2007. “Astell, Cartesian Ethics, and the Critique of Custom”. In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, eds. William Kolbrener, Michal Michelson, 165-179. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Broad Jacqueline. 2009. “Mary Astell on Virtuous Friendship”. Parergon 26, 2: 65-86.
Broad Jacqueline. 2015. The Philosophy of Mary Astell: An Early Modern Theory of Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Broad Jacqueline. 2016. “Mary Astell and the Virtues”. In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, eds. Alice Sowaal, Penny A. Weiss. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Brown Deborah. 2014. “The Sixth Meditation: Descartes and the Embodied Self”. In The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations, ed. David Cunning, 240-257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bryson Cynthia. 1998. “Mary Astell: Defender of the Disembodied Mind”. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 13, 4: 40-62.
Descartes René. 1641/1984. “The Meditations on First Philosophy”. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. II, eds. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes René. 1649/1985. “The Passions of the Soul”, trans. Robert Stoothoff. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1, eds. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Detlefsen Karen. 2016. “Custom, Freedom, and Equality: Mary Astell on Marriage and Women’s Education”. In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, eds. Penny A. Weiss, Alice Sowaal, 74-92. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Detlefsen Karen. 2017. “Cartesianism and Its Feminist Promise and Limits: The Case of Mary Astell”. In Descartes and Cartesianism: Essays in Honours of Desmond Clarke, eds. Stephen Gaukroger, Catherine Wilson, 191-206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forbes Allauren Samantha. 2019. “Mary Astell on Bad Custom and Epistemic Injustice”. Hypatia 34, 4: 777-801.
Greenberg Sean. 2007. “Descartes on the Passions: Function, Representation and Motivation”. Noûs 4: 714-734.
Harol Corrine. 2007. “Mary Astell’s Law of the Heart”. In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, eds. William Kolbrener, Michal Michelson, 87-97. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kendrick Nancy. 2017. “Mary Astell’s Theory of Spiritual Friendship”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26, 1: 46-65.
Kinnaird Joan K. 1976. “Mary Astell and the Conservative Contribution to English Feminism”. Journal of British Studies 19, 1: 61-62.
Kolbrener William. 2007. “Astell’s ‘Design of Friendship’ in Letters and A Serious Proposal, Part I”. In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, eds. William Kolbrener, Michal Michelson, 49-64. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lloyd Genevieve. 1984. The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Malebranche Nicholas. 1997. The Search After Truth and Elucidations, eds. Thomas M. Lennon, Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
More Henry. 1690. An Account of Virtue: or, Dr. Henry More’s Abridgment of Morals, trans. Edward Southwell. London: Benjamin Tooke.
Negri Antonio. 2007. Political Descartes: Reason, Ideology and the Bourgeois Project, trans. Alberto Toscano, Matteo Mandarini. London: Verso.
Norris John. 1697. “Reflections on the Conduct of Human Life: With Reference to the Study of Learning and Knowledge”. In Treatuses Upon Several Subjects. London: S. Manship.
O’Neill Eileen. 1999. “Women Cartesians, ‘Feminine Philosophy’, and Historical Exclusion”. In Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes, ed. Susan Bordo, 232-257. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
O’Neill Eileen. 2007. “Mary Astell on the Causation of Sensation”. In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, eds. William Kolbrener, Michal Michelson, 145-164. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.
Perry Ruth. 1984. “Mary Astell’s Response to the Enlightenment”. In Women and the Enlightenment, eds. Margaret Hunt, Margaret Jacob, Phyliss Mack, Ruth Perry, 13-40. New York: Institute for Research in History and the Haworth Press.
Perry Ruth. 1985. “Radical Doubt and the Liberation of Women”. Eighteenth-Century Studies 18, 4: 472-493.
Perry Ruth. 1986. The Celebrated Mary Astell. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rogers Katharine M. 1982. Feminism in Eighteenth-Century England. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Shapiro Lisa (ed.). 2007. The Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Smith Hilda L. 1982. Reason’s Disciples: Seventeenth-Century English Feminists. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Smith Hilda L. 1992. “Intellectual Bases for Feminist Analyses: The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries”. In Women and Reason, eds. Elizabeth D. Harvey, Kathleen Okruhlik, 19-38. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sowaal Alice. 2007. “Mary Astell’s Serious Proposal: Mind, Method, and Custom”. Philosophy Compass 2, 2: 227-243.
Sowaal Alice. 2016. “Mary Astell and the Development of Vice: Pride, Courtship, and the Woman’s Human Nature Question”. In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, eds. Alice Sowaal, Penny A. Weiss. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sowaal Alice. 2017. “Mary Astell on Liberty”. In Women and Liberty, 1600-1800: Philosophical Essays, eds. Jacqueline Broad, Karen Detlefsen, 178-194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Squadrito Kathleen M. 1987. “Mary Astell’s Critique of Locke’s View of Thinking Matter”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25, 3: 433-439.
Squadrito Kathleen M. 1991. “Mary Astell”. In A History of Women Philosophers, 1600-1900, ed. Mary Ellen Waithe, 87-100. Dordrecht: Springer.
Stuurman Siep. 2004. François Poulain de la Barre and the Invention of Modern Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Taylor E. Derek. 2001. “Mary Astell’s Ironic Assault on John Locke’s Theory of Thinking Matter”. Journal of the History of Ideas 62, 3: 505-522.
Watson Richard A. 2007. Descartes’s Ballet: His Doctrine of the Will and His Political Philosophy. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.
Weiss Penny A. 2017. “From the Throne to Every Private Family: Mary Astell as Analyst of Power”. In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, eds. Alice Sowaal, Penny A. Weiss, 128-152. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Welch Marcelle Maistre (ed.). 2002. Three Cartesian Feminist Treatises. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 438
Number of citations: 0