Evictionism and Negative Homesteading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2025.008Schlagworte
evictionism, negative homesteading,, abortion, libertarianismAbstract
In “Evictionism: The Only Compromise Solution to the Abortion Controversy”, Walter Block defends a position in the abortion debate known as “evictionism”. According to this view, a woman has the right to evict a fetus from her body for whatever reason at any time she wishes during the pregnancy, provided it is done in the gentlest manner possible. In the present article, I analyze the relationship between evictionism and negative homesteading – another well-known theory proposed by Block. I argue that these two views are incompatible, i.e., that holding both simultaneously leads to contradiction. I also suggest a way to resolve this contradiction by presenting an argument against negative homesteading.
Literaturhinweise
Block Walter E. 2011. “The Human Body Shield”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 22(1): 625–630.
Block Walter E. 2013. “Toward a Libertarian Theory of Evictionism”. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 35(2): 290–294.
Block Walter. E. 2019. “Human shields, missiles, negative homesteading and libertarianisms”. Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review 25(1): 9–22.
Block Walter. E. 2021. Evictionism: The compromise solution to the pro-life pro-choice debate controversy. Singapore: Springer Publishing Company.
Block Walter. E. 2024. “Evictionism: the only compromise solution to the abortion controversy”. Studia z Historii Filozofii 15(1): 57–66.
Dominiak Łukasz, Igor Wysocki. 2023. “Evictionism, Libertarianism, and Duties of the Fetus”. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48(6): 527–540.
Wiśniewski Jakub B. 2010. “A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment”. Libertarian Papers 2(16): 1–4.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz

Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 92
Number of citations: 0