Form in the Architecture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2017.046Keywords
architecture, for, expression dynamic of the architectural formAbstract
In the paper I discuss the concepts of the expression and meaning of the architectural form by Ralf Weber and Michael Mitias, and criticize Rudolf Arnheim's standpoint saying that the architectural form should be analysed in its dynamic dimension.
References
Alexander, Ch., Język wzorców, przeł. A. Kaczanowska, K. Maliszewska, M. Trzebiatowska, Gdańsk 2008.
Arnheim, R., Dynamika formy architektonicznej, przeł. A. Grzeliński, D. Juruś, Łódź 2016.
Arnheim, R., Sztuka i percepcja wzrokowa, przeł. J. Mach, Gdańsk 2004.
Arnheim, R., The Gestalt Theory of Expression, [w:] Towards a Psychology of Art, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1966.
Eisenman, P., Architecture as a Second language, [w:] Eisenman Inside Out Selected Writings 1963–1988, New Haven 2004. https://doubleoperative.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/eisenman-arch-as-2nd-language-cited.pdf.
Hartmann, N., O pozycji wartości estetycznych w systemie wartości w ogóle, [w:] W. Galewicz, Nicolai Hartmann, Warszawa 1987.
Ingarden, R., O dziele architektury, [w:] Studia z estetyki, t. 2, Warszawa 1966.
Jencks, Ch., Architektura postmodernistyczna, przeł. B. Gadomska, Warszawa 1987.
Mitias, M. H., Is Meaning in Architecture a Myth? Response to Ralf Weber, [w:] Philosophy and Architecture, red. M. H. Mitias, Amsterdam 1994.
Weber, R., The Myth of Meaningful Forms, [w:] Traditional Dwellings and Settlement Review, vol. 2, 1991, s. 65–74, http://iaste.berkeley.edu/pdfs/02.2f-Spr91weber-sml.pdf.
Weber, R., On the Aesthetics of Architecture, Vermont 1995.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 802
Number of citations: 0
