Moral Evil as a “Thick” Ethical Concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2022.014Słowa kluczowe
moral evil, thin ethical concepts, thick ethical conceptsAbstrakt
The paper aims to propose a framework for understanding of the concept of moral evil. It argues that “evil” should be considered one of the so-called “thick” ethical concepts, characterized by their ability to be simultaneously descriptive and normative. To that effect, it examines the relationship between the concepts of moral wrongness and the idea of evil, with a view to explaining why moral evil should be understood as a “thick” rather than a “thin” ethical concept. Finally, it offers some reasons for cultivating thick ethical concepts, and suggests the conditions which have to be met if a thick concept of evil is to be helpful rather than harmful.
Bibliografia
Anscombe Gertrude Elisabeth Margaret. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy 33: 1–19.
Arendt Hannah. 1963 [1994]. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Books.
Calder Todd. 2009. “The Prevalence of Evil”. In: Evil, Political Violence and Forgiveness, ed. Andrea Veltman and Kathryn Norlock. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Calder Todd. “The Concept of Evil”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. Access 28.05.2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/concept-evil/.
Card Claudia. 2002. The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clendinnen Inga. 1999. Reading the Holocaust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cole Philip. 2006. The Myth of Evil. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Garrard Eve. 1998. “The Nature of Evil”. Philosophical Explorations 1: 43–60.
Geertz Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward and Interpretive Theory of Culture”. In: Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Kekes John. 1990. Facing Evil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
MacIntyre Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Milgram Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Nagel Thomas. 1993. “Moral Luck”. In: Moral Luck, ed. Daniel Statman, 57–71. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Perrett Roy W. 2002. “Evil and Human Nature”. The Monist 85(2): 304–319.
Russell Luke. 2006. “Evil-Revivalism Versus Evil-Skepticism”. The Journal of Value Inquiry 40: 89–105.
Russell Luke. 2007. “Is Evil Action Qualitatively Distinct from Ordinary Wrongdoing?”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85(4): 659–677.
Steiner Hillel. 2002. “Calibrating Evil”. The Monist 85(2): 183–193.
Taylor Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thomas Lawrence. 1993. Vessels of Evil: American Slavery and the Holocaust. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Williams Bernard. 1985 [2011]. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London–New York: Routledge Classics.
Wolf Susan. 1987. “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility”. In: Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions, ed. Ferdinand D. Schoeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimbardo Philip. 2007. The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 592
Liczba cytowań: 0