Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Introduction. Utopian or destructive society? Is it better to be an egoist or an altruist in a group and which factors does it depend on? Aim. Difficulty in making an unambiguous assessment of social interactions was the reason for conducting a few studies which aimed at identifying factors shaping altruistic and selfish behaviors. Due to the scope of the studies, percentage results relate only to selected social communities. Materials and methods. The first study aimed at evaluating altruistic behaviors of an individual and of a group and was focused on an analysis of interpersonal interactions between a person who needed help (not calling for it) and a bystander observing the incident. The second experiment evaluated psychologization of confidence and focused on the assessment of interpersonal relations of two participants. The last, third study aimed at evaluating altruistic attitude towards various social relations. Results. Conducted studies show that there are a lot of factors which determine conscious (financial benefits, empathy) and unconscious (difficulty in interpreting the incident, inadequate intervention, unwillingness to feel responsible for own behavior) development of altruistic and egoistic behaviors in interpersonal interactions.

Wojciszke B. Człowiek wśród ludzi. Zarys psychologii społecznej. Warsaw, WS: SCHOLAR 2004.

Kowalczyk S. Człowiek a społeczność: zarys filozofii społecznej. Lublin, QLU: KUL 2005.

Marody M, Giza-Poleszczuk A. Przemiany więzi społecznych. Zarys teorii zmiany społecznej. Warsaw, WS: SCHOLAR 2004.

Darley JM, Latane B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968; 8:377-83.

https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fh0025589

Kozyr-Kowalski S. Socjologia, społeczeństwo obywatelskie i państwo. Poznan, POZ: UAM 2004.

Frankfort-Nachmias Ch, Nachmias D. Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych. Poznan, POZ: Zysk & S-ka 2001.

Piliavin IM, Rodin J, Piliavin JA. Good Samaritanism: An underground phenomenon? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969; 13:289-99.

https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fh0028433

Piff PK, Kraus MW, Côté S, Cheng BH, Keltner D. Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010; 99:771-84.

https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0020092

Ramsey G. Can altruism be unified? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2016; 56:32-8.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Can-altruism-be-unified-Ramsey/787d6994f1f2d9260b5fde7c0f1df575f9f0e659

Scharf K, Smith SL. Relational altruism and giving in social groups. Journal of Public Economics 2016; 141:1-10.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272716300718?via%3Dihub

Feiler DC, Tost LP, Grant AM. Mixed reasons, missed givings: The costs of blending egoistic and altruistic reasons in donation requests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012; 48:1322-8.

https://www.marshall.usc.edu/sites/default/files/tost/intellcont/Feiler%20Tost%20Grant%202012%20JESP-1.pdf

Yi R, Pickover A, Stuppy-Sullivan AM, Baker S, Landes RD. Impact of episodic thinking on altruism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2016; 65:74-81.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096404/

De Waal FBM. Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology 2008; 59:279-300.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17550343/