La strategia polacca e italiana in materia di attuazione dei principi guida delle Nazioni Unite su imprese e diritti umani a confront
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TSP-W.2017.006Parole chiave
attuazione dei principi guida, Nazioni Unite, umani a confrontAbstract
Il presente articolo affronta la questione dell’attuazione delle «Linee guida dell'ONU per l'economia e i diritti dell'uomo» tramite redazione di un piano d’azione nazionale (PAN) in Polania e Italia. Le Nazioni Unite hanno lottato in passato per colmare il divario nel diritto internazionale e trovare una risposta alla domanda: come imporre obblighi di diritti umani alle società? Dopo diversi tentativi falliti di creare standard internazionali, il cambiamento è avvenuto nel 2005, quando John Ruggie è stato nominato rappresentante speciale dell'ONU per l'economia e i diritti dell'uomo. Nel 2011, le attività condotte dal professor Ruggie sono sfociate nelle «Linee guida per l'economia e i diritti dell'uomo» che vengono lentamente adottate dagli Stati sotto forma di piani d'azione nazionali. L'obiettivo di questo contributo è quello di analizzare e confrontare il PAN adottato nel dicembre 2016 in Italia e il progetto del PAN polacco, che sarà probabilmente attuato nel 2017. In base alle nostre osservazioni, concludiamo che entrambi i PAN non dispongono di proposte costruttive e sono caratterizzati da una certa vaghezza. Il tempo mostrerà in che misura e in che modo entrambi i governi promuoveranno le loro proposte non vincolanti.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Addo M. K., The Reality of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, „Human Rights Law Review” 2014, vol. 14.
Backer Larry C., Moving Forward the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights: Between Enterprise Social Norm, State Domestic Legal Order, and the Treaty Law that Might Bind Them All, „Fordham International Law Journal” 2015, vol. 38.
Backer Larry C., Regulating Multinational Corporations: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities, „Brown Journal of World Affairs”, vol. 22 issue 1.
Bilchitz D., The Ruggie Framework: an Adequate Rubric for Corporate Human Rights Obligations?, „SUR International Journal on Human Rights” 2010, vol. 12.
Bordignon M., Cremonesi G.M., The UNGPs Third Pillar in the Italian Action Plan: an assessment of the existing NAPs and of the barriers to the Italian judicial system, available at: https://businesshumanrights.org/sites/default/files/documents/NAP%20contribution_Bordignon-Cremonesi_DEF.pdf
Brabandere E. Non-State actors and human rights: corporate responsibility and the attempts to formalize the role of corporations as participants in the international legal system, [in:] Participants in the International Legal System, Multiple perspectives on non-state actors in international law, ed. J. d’Aspremont, London/New York 2011.
Branson C., Business and Human Rights: the New Global Consensus?, „Flinders Law Journal” 2014, vol. 16.
DIHR/ICAR, Toolkit for the Development, Implementation and Review of State Commitments to Business and Human Rights Framework, 2014.
ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Comm. On the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Related Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, UN doc. E/CN.4/2004 /L.73/Rev.1
European Commission, A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility, 25 October 2011, COM (2011) 681
Feeney P., Business and Human Rights: The Struggle for Accountability in the UN and the Future Direction of the Advocacy Agenda, „International Law on Human Rights” 2009, vol. 11.
Foreign Affairs Council, Council Conclusions on the Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2015-2019, 20 July 2015, 10897/15
Gatto A., Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights, Obligations under EU Law and International Law, Northampton 2011.
Grear A., Weston Burns H., The Betrayal of Human Rights and the Urgency of Universal Corporate Accountability: Reflections on a Post-Kiobel Lawscape, „Human Rights Law Review” 2015, vol. 15.
Human Rights Council, Human Rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, A/HRC/17/L.17/Rev.1, 2011.
Jamali D., MNCs and International Accountability Standards through an Institutional Lens: Evidence of Symbolic Conformity or Decoupling, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2010, vol. 95.
Nolan J., Refining the Rules of the Game: The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights, „Utrecht Journal of International and European Law” 2014, vol. 30.
OHCHR, Human Rights Resolution 2005/69.
Prenkert J.D., Shackelford S.J., Business, Human Rights, and the Promise of Polycentricity, „Vanderbilt Journal of Transnationa Law” 2014, vol. 47.
Ratner S., Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility, „Yale Law Journal” 2001-2002, vol. 111.
Report of The United Nations High Commissioner On Human Rights On The Responsibilities Of Transnational Corporations And Related Business Enterprises With Regard To Human Rights, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/91, 15 February 2005.
Ruggie J., Just Business, Multinational Corporations and Human Rights, New York 2013.
Ruggie J., Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, pespect and Remedy” Framework, Human Rights Council, (Seventeenth session), A/HRC/17/31, 21 March 2011
Ruggie J., Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, “Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts”, Human Rights Council, A/HRC/4/035, 9 February 2007.
Ruggie J., Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, “Protect, Respect and Remedy: Framework for Business and Human Rights”, A/HRC/8/5, 7 April 2008
Stevelman F., Global Finance, Multinationals and Human Rights: With Commentary on Backer’s Critique of the 2008 Report by John Ruggie, „Santa Clara Journal of International Law” 2011, vol. 9.
Swiss Coalition for Corporate Justice, Report on Switzerland’s strategy for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 9 December 2016
UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights, Guidance on National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights, Geneve 2016
Weissbrodt D., Kruger M., Human Rights Responsibilities of Business as Non-State Actors, [in:] Non-State Actors and Human rights, ed. P.Alston, Oxford 2006
Żenkiewicz M., Human Rights Violations by Multinational Corporations and UN Initiatives, „Review of International Law and Politics” 2016, vol. 12, issue 1.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 312
Number of citations: 0