Domestic Mechanism of Statement’s Control During the Election Campaign – Guideline in the light of the ECtHR’s Jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TSP-W.2020.020Parole chiave
electoral campaign, freedom of expression, electoral dispute, European Convention on Human Rights, free elections.Abstract
Preventing the progressive phenomena of negative campaign, demagogy and dissemination of false information is one the most important challenges for a qualitative election campaign. One of the solutions may be establishing accelerated electoral proceedings, for which a pattern can be sought inter alia, in polish legislation (article 111 of Polish Electoral Code). Although the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has never comprehensively commented on accelerated control mechanism in the election campaign, the case-law analysis allows to identify the minimum standards. The article indicates a cross-sectional understanding of freedom of expression in regard to electoral campaign, as well as minimum requirements to be met by those mechanism.Riferimenti bibliografici
Bodnar A., Wykonywanie orzeczeń Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w Polsce – Wymiar instytucjonalny, Warszawa 2018.
El-Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, App. No. 39630/09, 13 December 2012.
Kudła v. Poland, App. No. 30210/96, judgment of 26 October 2000, ECHR 2000-XI.
Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, App. No. 7654/76, judgement of 6 November 1980.
De Souza Ribeiro v. France, App. No. 22689/07, 13 December 2012.
Wagner and J.M.W.L v. Luxembourg, App. No. 76240/01, 28 June 2007.
Kita v. Poland, No. 57659/00, 8 July 2008, unreported.
Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A, No. 113.
Bowman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998 I.
Kwiecień v. Poland, No. 5174499, 9 January 2007, unreported.
Feldek v. Slovakia, No. 29032/95, judgment of 12 July 2001, ECHR 2001-VIII.
Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, No. 37698/97, § 33, ECHR 2000 X).
Lingens v. Austria, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A, No. 103, p. 26.
De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, judgment of 24 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, p. 236.
Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], No. 49017/99, § 76, ECHR 2004-XI.
Braun v. Poland, App. No 30162/10, 4 November 2014, unreported.
Kurski v. Poland, App. No. 51744/99, 5 July 2016, unreported.
Lombardo and Others v. Malta, App. No. 7333/06, 24 April 2007.
Judgment of Constitutional Tribunal in Poland, App. No. K 7/09, 21 July 2009, (OTK ZU 2009/7/A, poz. 113).
Hirvisaari v. Finland, App. No. 49684/99, 27 September 2011.
Hadijanastassiou v. Greece, App. No. 12945/87, 16 December 1992.
Steur v. Nedherlandts, App. No. 39657/98, 28 October 2013, Reports 2003-XI.
Malisiewicz Gąsior v. Poland, App. No. 43797/98, 6 April 2006, unreported.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2021 Studi Polacco-Italiani di Toruń
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 607
Number of citations: 0
