Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do stopki
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Strona domowa
  • Aktualny numer
  • Archiwum
  • O czasopiśmie
    • O czasopiśmie
    • Przesyłanie tekstów
    • Zespół redakcyjny
    • Rada Naukowa
    • Indeksowanie
    • Partnerzy zagraniczni
    • Standardy etyczne
    • Polityka prywatności
    • Wydawca
    • Kontakt
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Torun International Studies

EUROPEAN UNION AT THE DAWN OF TECHNOLOGICAL COLD WAR
  • Strona domowa
  • /
  • EUROPEAN UNION AT THE DAWN OF TECHNOLOGICAL COLD WAR
  1. Strona domowa /
  2. Archiwum /
  3. Tom 1 Nr 18 (2023) /
  4. Artykuły

EUROPEAN UNION AT THE DAWN OF TECHNOLOGICAL COLD WAR

Autor

  • Tomasz Gajewski Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-1591

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2023.015

Słowa kluczowe

European Union, United States, China, digital technology, cold war

Abstrakt

The purpose of the study was to construct a picture of the EU’s global position in a world defined by the US-Chinese technological Cold War. Morphological analysis has been used to enable a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the technological and social domains. Structured interviews were also used to support the analytical process. The results of the exploration showed a picture of the EU’s multi-level technological weakness compared to competing powers. While the EU is not a weak entity, its future international position will depend on the creation of its own technological capabilities and on cooperation with the United States. Both lines of action are subject to multiple risks. Firstly, some aggressive technological developments (such as the plans to place microchips production in Europe) can generate more problems than diversification. Secondly, the EU must extend its work on high-tech (primarily AI) beyond the logic of market regulation and focus on their geopolitical and military dimension. It must also be ready for possible obstacles in cooperation with the United States. The alternative to this track, as the analysis shows, is the technological, and hence the political and economic peripheral status, where two technological superpowers – the United States and authoritarian China will compete. The most negative result for the EU is the status of “digital colony”. The paper aspires to be a part of the effort to fill the existing void in the scientific output of Polish social sciences, regarding exploration of the geopolitical dimension of technological progress, especially its impact on EU’s position in the new power distribution model, which will be the result of the rivalry between the US and China.

Bibliografia

A European strategy for data. (2020, February 19). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1593073685620&uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0066

Agten, S. (2021). The Great Decoupling and a New Cold War. In S. Agten (Ed.), Adventures in the Chinese Economy: 16 Years from the Inside (pp. 219-237). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1167-4_12. Palgrave Macmillan.

Aho, B., & Duffield, R. (2020). Beyond Surveillance Capitalism: Privacy, Regulation And Big Data In Europe and China. Economy and Society, 49(2), pp. 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1690275

Allen, J. R., Hodges, F. B., & Lindley-French, J. (2021). Future War and the Defence of Europe. Oxfrod University Press.

Allison, G. (2018). Skazani Na Wojnę. Czy Ameryka i Chiny Unikną Pułapki Tukidydesa. Pascal.

Álvarez, A., & Ritchley, T. (2015). Applications of General Morphological Analysis From Engineering Design to Policy Analysis. Acta Morphologica Generalis, 4(1).

Bartels, H.-P., Kellner, A. M., & Optenhögel, U. (Eds.). (2017). Strategic Autonomy and the Defence of Europe. On the Road to European Army? Dietz Verlag.

Behrmann, E. (2021, September 30). EU Makes $2 Billion Push to Curb Reliance on China’s Rare Earths. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-30/eu-makes-2-billion-push-to-curb-reliance-on-china-s-rare-earths

Bertuzzi, L. (2021, December 1). Data Governance: New EU Law For Data-Sharing Adopted. Euractiv. https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/data-governance-new-eu-law-for-data-sharing-adopted/

Biba, S., & Wolf, R. (Eds.). (2021). Europe in an Era of Growing Sino-American Competition: Coping with an Unstable Triangle. Routledge.

Bobba, S., Carrara, S., Huisman, J., Mathieux, F., & Pavel, C. (2020). Critical Raw Materials for Strategic Technologies and Sectors in the EU. European Commission Joint Research Centre.

Brattberg, E., Csernatoni, R., & Rugova, V. (2020). Europe and AI: Leading, Lagging Behind, or Carving Its Own Way? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Cameron, F. (2019). The European Union's New Rival - China. GIGA Focus Asien, 7. GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Asien-Studien.

Carcy, L. (2021). The New EU Screening Mechanism for Foreign Direct Investments When The EU Takes Back Control. Colleger of Europe.

Castro, D., & McLouglin, M. (2021). Who Is Winning The AI Race: China, The EU, or The United States? Center fo Data Innovation.

Cerulus, L. (2021, November 30). Cracks Appear In West’s 5G Strategy After Huawei. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/us-europe-5g-strategy-huawei/

Chen, Z. (2016). China, The European Union and The Fragile World Order. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), pp. 775-792. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12383

Clarke, L. (2021, June 15). Echnical Standards-Setting Is Shaping Up To Be The Next China-US Showdown. Techmonitor. https://techmonitor.ai/technology/technical-standards-setting-shaping-up-next-china-us-showdown

Creswell, J. M. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications.

Diesen, G. (2021). Great Power Politics in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Geoeconomics of Technological Sovereignty. Bloomsbury.

Drent, M. (2018). European Strategic Autonomy: Going It Alone? Clingendael Institute.

Dupont, A. (2020). Mitigating The New Cold War: Managing US-China Trade, Techn and Geopolitical Conflict. Center for Independent Studies.

Ericsson named a Leader in the 2021 Gartner Magic Quadrant for 5G Network Infrastructure for Communications Service Providers report. (2021, February 2021). Ercisson. https://www.ericsson.com/en/press-releases/2021/2/ericsson-named-a-leader-in-the-2021-gartner-magic-quadrant-for-5g-network-infrastructure-for-communications-service-providers-report

ERMA. (2020, September 3). European Raw Materials Alliance. https://erma.eu/about-us/

EU Appeals To Shared Values To Tempt Taiwan's Chip Firms. (2021, October 14). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/eu-appeals-shared-values-tempt-taiwans-chip-firms-2021-10-14/

EU Unveils Strategy To Reduce Dependency On China. (2021, May 18). Economist Intelligence Unit. https://www.eiu.com/n/eu-unveils-strategy-to-reduce-dependency-on-china/

EU-US Trade and Technology Council: Commission Launches Consultation Platform For Stakeholder's Involvement To Shape Transatlantic Cooperation. (2021, October 18). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_5308

EU’s Costly Plan To Close The Semiconductor Gap. (2021, October 4). Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/a016f686-791f-4a3f-9e7a-c6389896862b

European Commission. (2020). Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path Towards Greater Security and Sustainability. European Commission.

European Commission. (2018, January). USA-China-EU Plans for AI: Where Do We Stand? Digital Transformation Monitor. https://ati.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2020-07/USA-China-EU%20plans%20for%20AI%20-%20where%20do%20we%20stand%20%28v5%29.pdf

European Commission. (2021, July 21). Commission launches alliances for microelectronics and cloud technologies. Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/78362

Feng, S. (2020). Cyclical Globalizationand China’s StrategicOptions. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 6(3), pp. 355–370. https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S2377740020500207

Fiott, D., & Theodosopoulos, V. (2020). Sovereigny Over Supply? European Union Institute of Security Studies.

Franke, U., & Torreblanca, J. I. (2021). Geo-Tech Politics: Why Technology Shapes European Power. European Council on Foreign Relations.

Gajewski, T. (2020). Druk 3D Jako Technologia Zakłócająca W Systemie Międzynarodowym. Annales UMCS. Sectio K, 27(1), pp. 43-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/k.2020.27.1.43-64

García Pérez, R. (2019). Strategic Autonomy of the European Union. In The Routledge Handbook of European Security Law and Policy (pp. 81-95). Routledge.

Grevi, G. (2020). Fostering Europe’s Strategic Autonomy A question of purpose and action. European Policy Centre - Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Grevi, G. (2021). Europe’s Strategic Autonomy and the Partnership Approach. In P. Gieg, T. Lowinger, M. Pietzko, A. Zürn, U. S. Bava, & G. Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet (Eds.), EU-India Relations The Strategic Partnership in the Light of the European Union Global Strategy (pp. 19-31). Springer International Publishing.

Gross, A., & Murgia, M. (2020, March 27). China and Huawei Propose Reinvention Of The Internet. Financial Tims. https://www.ft.com/content/c78be2cf-a1a1-40b1-8ab7-904d7095e0f2

Grosse, T. G. (2014). Geoeconomic Relations Between the EU and China: The Lessons From the EU Weapon Embargo and From Galileo. Geopolitics, 19(1), pp. 40-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2013.789864

Harper, J. (2021, April 29). The EU's Microchip Dilemma: Too Little Or Too Late? Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/the-eus-microchip-dilemma-too-little-or-too-late/a-57367537

Headon, T. (2021, December 9). Data Act: Summary Report On Public Consultation. Lexology. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=88907ef5-edac-4ce2-a994-233aea64948e

Heisbourg, F. 8.-1. (2020). NATO 4.0: The Atlantic Alliance and the Rise of China. Survival, 62(2), pp. 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2020.1739950

Helwig, N. (2021). EU Strategic Autonomy. A Reality Check for Europe's Global Agenda. Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

Hoffman, S., Bradshaw, S., & Taylor, E. (2019, August 22). Great Power Rivalries In 5G Technology Markets. In C. A. Crocker, F. Osler Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Diplomacy and the Future of World Order (pp. 241-272). Georgtown University Press.

Hopwell, K. (2020). Clash of Powers: US-China Rivalry in Global Trade Governance. Cambridge University Press.

Howorth, J. (2017a). Strategic Autonomy and EU-NATO Cooperation: Squaring The Circle. Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations.

Interview with Aexl Voss, MEP. (2021, December 2). Technological Dimension of EU's Strategic Autonomy.

Interview with Angelika Niebler, MEP. (2021, December 23). Technological Dimension of EU's Strategic Autonomy.

Intreviw with Radosław Skorski, MEP (2021, December 17). Technological dimension of EU's strategic autonomy.

Kaska, K., Beckvard, H., & Minárik, T. (2019). Huawei, 5G and China as a Security Threat. NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence.

Kennedy, S. (2020). China's Uneven High-Tech Drive. Implications for the United States. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Khanna, P. (2019). The Future Is Asian: Global Order in the Twenty-First Century. Orion Publishing Group.

Kissinger, H. (2014). O Chinach. Wydawnictwo Czarne.

Knutsen, B. O. (2016). European Defence Research In Crisis? The Way Towards Strategic Autonomy. Global Affairs, 2(3), pp. 287-295, DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2016.1219152

Komiyama, K., & Tsuchiya, M. (2021, April). The Triadic Conflict That Lies Ahead in the U.S.-China Tech Confrontation. Asia Policy, 16(2), pp. 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2021.0016

Kuik, C.-C. (2021). The Twin Chessboards of US-China Rivalry: Impact on the Geostrategic Supply and Demand in Post-Pandemic Asia. Asian Perspective, 45(1), pp. 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.0.0010

Lehne, S. (2020). How the EU Can Survive in a Geopolitical Age. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Lewis, J. A. (2019). Emerging Technologies and Managing the Risk of Tech Transfer to China. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Lindstrom, G. (2020). What if... A Country Restricted Access to Rare Earth Elements? In F. Gaub (Ed.), What if...? 14 futures for 2024 (pp. 67-73). European Union Institute for Security Studies.

Lippert, B., & Perthes, V. (2020, April). Strategic Rivalry Between United States and China: Causes, Tragectories, and Implications for Europe. SWP Research Paper., 4. https://doi.org/10.18449/2020RP04

Lo, C. (2021). China's Global Disruption. Myths and Reality. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781800437944

Ma, W. (2021). The Digital War: How China's Tech Power Shapes the Future of AI, Blockchain and Cyberspace. John Wiley & Sons.

Manancourt, V., & Lau, S. (2021, August 6). Europe Was The World’s Great Tech Enforcer. Not Anymore. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-big-tech-enforcer-us-china-gdpr-privacy-competition-apple-google-facebook-amazon/

Marseille Becomes Focus of US-China Submarine Cable Battle. (2020, December 2). Intelligence Online. https://www.intelligenceonline.com/grey-areas/2020/12/02/marseille-becomes-focus-of-us-china-submarine-cable-battle,109624883-art

Martin, J. (2012). When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. Penguin Books.

Modlicz, C. (2021). China, the USA and Technological Supremacy in Europe. Routledge.

Naujokaitytė, G. (2021, September 21). EU Faces Major Barriers to Deploying Artificial Intelligence. Science Business. https://sciencebusiness.net/news/eu-faces-major-barriers-deploying-artificial-intelligence

Oxford Analytica. (2021). Tech Risks Shape Chinese and Western National Security. Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB260678

Perthes, V. (2021). Dimensions of Rivalry: China, the United States, and Europe. China International Strategy Review, 3, pp. 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00065-z

Peterson, J. (2016). Choosing Europe or Choosing TTIP?: The European Union and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. European Foreign Affairs Review(3), pp. 383-401.

Pop, A., & Grigoras, R. (2021, January). Towards a Bifurcated Future in The US-China relationship: What Is In It For The EU? Futures, 125, p. 102634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102634

Pop, V., Hua, S., & Michaels, D. (2021, February 8). From Lightbulbs to 5G, China Battles West for Control of Vital Technology Standards. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/from-lightbulbs-to-5g-china-battles-west-for-control-of-vital-technology-standards-11612722698

Przychodniak, M. (2019). China and the Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Value Chains, 5G, and Emerging Markets. PISM Policy Paper, 171(1), pp. 2-12.

Ritchley, T. (2013). General Morphological Analysis. A general method for non-quantified modelling. Swedish Morphological Society. http://swemorph.com/pdf/gma.pdf

Rudolf, P. (2021). The Sino-American World Conflict. Survival, 62(2), pp. 87-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.1905980

Rühlig, T., & Björk, M. (2020). What to Make of the Huawei Debate? 5G Network Security and Technology Dependency in Europe. The Swedish Institute of International Affairs.

Rühlig, T., Seaman, J., & Voelsen, D. (2019). 5G and The US-China Tech Rivalry - A Test for Europe's Future In The Digital Age: How Can Europe Shift Back From Back Foot To Front Foot? Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit. https://doi.org/10.18449/2019C29

Sajduk, B. (2019). Theoretical Premises Of The Impact of Artificial Intelligence On The International Relations And Security. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 2, pp. 157–180. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJPS.2019.017

Santander, S. (2014). The EU and the Shifts of Power in the International Order: Challenges and Responses. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(1), pp. 65-82.

Schüller, M., & Schüler-Zhou, Y. (2020). United States-China Decoupling: Time for European Tech Sovereignty . Hamburg: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Asien-Studien.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin.

Shaping Europe's digital future. (2020). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/shaping-europe-digital-future_en

Simón, L. (2021). Subject and Object: Europe in Sino-American Competition. EUI Robert Schuman Centre.

Simón, L., Desmaele, L., & Becker, J. (2021, Spring). Europe as a Secondary Theater? Competition with China and the Future of America’s European Strategy. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 15(1), pp. 90-115.

Smith, J., & Taussig, T. (2019, September/October). The Old World and the Middle Kingdom. Foreign Affairs, 98(5), pp. 112-125.

Soulava, B., Cameron, H., & Ying, V. (2021). Data Rules for Machine Learning: How Europe Can Unlock The Potential While Mitigating the Risks. Atlantic Council.

Special Committee on Artificial Intelligence in a Digital Age (repporteur: Axel Voss). (2021). Draft Report On Artificial Intelligence In A Digital Age (2020/2266(INI)). European Parliament.

Starrs, S. K., & Germann, J. (2021, September). Responding to the China Challenge in Techno-nationalism: Divergence Between Germany and The United States. Development and Change, 52(5), pp. 1122-1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12683

Sun, H. (2019). U.S.-China Tech War. Impacts and Porspects. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 5(2), pp. 197-212. https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S237774001950012X

Terlikowski, M. (2021). European Strategic Autonomy and Third Countries: The Defence Industrial Dimension. GLOBSEC Policy Institute.

Toro Hardy, A. (2020). The Technological Contest Between China and The United States [GLO Discussion Paper, No. 521]. Global Labor Organization (GLO).

Umbach, F. (2021). EU-China Relations at a Crossroads: Decoupling or a European "Sinatra Doctrine". East Asian Policy, 13(1), pp. 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793930521000040

Walkowski, M. (2019). Between the United States and the People’s Republic of China. The Dilemma Of The European Union’s Negotiation Position In The Context Of The Accelerated Technological Development Of The PRC. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, pp. 311-325. https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2019.13.22

Walsh, K. (2003). Foreign High-Tech R&D in China. Risks, Rewards, and Implications for U.S.-CHINA Relations. The Henry L. Stimson Center.

Wong, P. (2021). Techno-Geopolitics: U.S.-China Tech War and the Practice of Digital Statecraft. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003047100

Woo, S. (2020, October 22). The U.S. vs. China: The High Cost of the Technology Cold War. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-u-s-vs-china-the-high-cost-of-the-technology-cold-war-11603397438

Wright, N. D. (Ed.). (2020). Artificial Intelligence, China, Russia, and the Global Order Technological, Political, Global, and Creative Perspectives. Air University Press.

Wu, X. (2020). Technology, Power, And Uncontrolled Great Power Strategic Competition Between China and The United States. China International Strategy Review, 2, pp. 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-020-00040-0

Yang, Y. (2021). The New Cold War: America's New Approach To Sino-American relations. China International Strategy Review, 3, pp. 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00071-1

Zhang, K. H. (2020). Industrial Policy and Technology Innovation Under The US Trade War against China. The Chinese Economy, 53(5), pp. 63-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2020.1730553

Zieliński, T. (2020). Strategic Autonomy of the European Union in Security and Defence. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 18(1), pp. 5-22. https://doi.org/10.47459/lasr.2020.18.1

Zwicky, F. (1969). Discovery, Invention, Research - Through the Morphological Approach. The Macmillian Company.

Torun International Studies

Pobrania

  • PDF (English)

Opublikowane

2023-09-30

Jak cytować

Gajewski, T. (2023). EUROPEAN UNION AT THE DAWN OF TECHNOLOGICAL COLD WAR. Torun International Studies, 1(18), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2023.015
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polski)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Pobierz cytowania
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numer

Tom 1 Nr 18 (2023)

Dział

Artykuły

Licencja

Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Tomasz Gajewski

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Statystyki

Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 869
Liczba cytowań: 0

Wyszukiwanie

Wyszukiwanie

Przeglądaj

  • Indeks autorów
  • Lista archiwalnych numerów

Użytkownik

Użytkownik

Aktualny numer

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informacje

  • dla czytelników
  • dla autorów
  • dla bibliotekarzy

Newsletter

Zapisz się Wypisz się

Język / Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tagi

Szukaj przy pomocy tagu:

European Union, United States, China, digital technology, cold war
W górę

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partnerzy platformy czasopism

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu Deklaracja dostępności Sklep wydawnictwa