RUSSIA’S FALIN–KVITSINSKY ENERGY DOCTRINE: HISTORY AND EXPERIENCE APPLYING TO SELECTED CENTRAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2023.014Słowa kluczowe
Falin–Kvitsinsky doctrine, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, energy security, natural gas; infrastructureAbstrakt
This article discusses the evolution of the energy security of Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine since the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), in terms of natural gas supplies. Instead of framing energy dependencies on Russia in a descriptive way, this article shows the empirical validation of the Falin–Kvitsinsky doctrine, which includes the use of energy resources as tool in foreign policy. Therefore, the authors propose a three-element Falin–Kvitsinsky doctrine indicator to measure the power of this doctrine using the yearly data for 1991–2021. Authors argue that the impact of this doctrine should be assessed through the lens of energy supply security and then measured by appropriate indicators. This approach might be seen as opposite to the mainstream publications which are mostly descriptive in this field. In the article, the authors provided clear evidence of the Falin–Kvitsinsky doctrine existence until the end of 2021, which was applied during the Russian-Ukrainian war. Actions taken by Russia over the years were aimed at making Central European countries dependent on natural gas supply, which would then prompt these countries to limit their aid to Ukraine during the conflict that began in 2022. In conclusion, Russia is able to pursue its political goals in the manner suggested by the Falin–Kvitsinsky doctrine as long as each Central European country tries to ensure its own energy security. However, the Falin-Kvitsky doctrine did not fully meet its objectives, as Central European countries, as a result of the Russian-Ukrainian war, were able to quickly take steps to diversify the sources and directions of natural gas supplies by taking comprehensive measures and strengthening cooperation.
Bibliografia
Åslund, A. (2021). What Will The Impact Be If Nord Stream 2 Is Completed? [Issue brief]. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/What-will-the-impact-be-if-Nord-Stream-2-is-completed-4.27.pdf
Beccue, P., & Hunington, H. (2005). Oil Disruption: Risk Assessment (Special Report 8; p. 62). Energy Modelling Forum.
Cabalu, H. (2010). Indicators of Security of Natural Gas Supply in Asia. Energy Policy, 38(1), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.008
Chester, L. (2010). Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit its Polysemic Nature. Energy Policy, 38(2), 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039
Chowdhary, T. (2019). Lithuania Presses Belarus to Pursue Gas Over Nuclear Power, Independent Commodity Intelligence Services. ICIS. https://www.icis.com/explore/resources/news/2019/03/05/10328678/lithuania-presses-belarus-to-pursue-gas-over-nuclear-power/
Correljé, A., & van der Linde, C. (2006). Energy Supply Security and Geopolitics: A European Perspective. Energy Policy, 34(5), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.008
Energy Law Act of 16 May 2002, No IX-884 (Republic of Lithuania). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/cc700b403c3f11e68f278e2f1841c088?jfwid=-wsolgq7jf
Energy Law Dz. U. 1997 nr 54 poz. 348 (Poland). http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19970540348
Fedorov, Y. E. (2013). Continuity and Change in Russia’s Policy Toward Central and Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46(3), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.06.003
Gomółka, K. (2019). Ukraine’s Energy Security in Strategies. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio K – Politologia, 26(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2019.26.2.113-126
Górnikiewicz, M., Bielawski, R., & Walkowiak, M. (2020). Russian “Hard Power” and “Soft Power” in Influencing Central and Eastern European Countries on the Example of Poland in the COVID-19 Era. European Research Studies Journal, XXIII(Special Issue 3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1849
Government of the Republic of Estonia. (2010). National Security Concept of Estonia. Republic of Estionia Ministry of Defence. https://www.kaitseministeerium.ee/sites/default/files/elfinder/article_files/national_security_concept_2017_0.pdf
Government of the Ukraine. (2006). The Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the Period Until 2030 [Energy Strategy].
Greenwood, A. (2016). Shale Gas Remains Mostly a US Phenomenon, Independent Commodity Intelligence Services. ICIS. https://www.icis.com/explore/resources/news/2016/09/22/10036053/insight-shale-gas-remains-mostly-a-us-phenomenon/
Gupta, E. (2008). Oil Vulnerability Index of Oil-importing Countries. Energy Policy, 36(3), 1195–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.011
Hirss, M., & Spruds, A. (2014). Energy (In)Security: Challenges and Prospects for The European Union and Baltic States. Latvian Institute of International Affairs. https://www.liia.lv/site/docs/Energy_Brief_2014_web_1.pdf
International Energy Agency. (2019). Areas of Work. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/areas-of-work/ensuring-energy-security
Jakstas, T. (2019). Creation Of Regional Gas Market in The Baltic States and Finland: Challenges and Opportunities (BSR Policy Briefing). Centrum Balticum Foundation. https://www.centrumbalticum.org/files/4383/BSR_Policy_Briefing_8_2019.pdf
Jansen, J., Van Arkel, W. G., & Boots, M. G. (2004). Designing Indicators of Long-Term Energy Supply Security (ECN-C--04-007). Energy research Centre of the Netherlands. http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2004/c04007.pdf
Kaynak, B. (2018). From Blue Stream to Turkish Stream an Assessment of Turkey’s Energy Dependence on Russia. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 79–90.
Knox-Hayes, J., Brown, M. A., Sovacool, B. K., & Wang, Y. (2013). Understanding Attitudes Toward Energy Security: Results of a cross-national survey. Global Environmental Change, 23(3), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.003
Lefèvre, N. (2010). Measuring the Energy Security Implications of Fossil Fuel Resource Concentration. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1635–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.003
Martkiewicz, M., & Strzelecki, M. (2014). Poland Starts Talks with Russian Gazprom to Cut Gas Price. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-11-05/poland-starts-talks-with-russian-gazprom-to-cut-gas-price
Menkiszak, M., & Duchnowicz, I. (2019). Strategiczna Kontynuacja, Taktyczna Zmiana: Polityka Bezpieczeństwa Europejskiego Rosji. Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich.
Novikau, A. (2019). Conceptualizing and Achieving Energy Security: The Case of Belarus. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100408
Novikau, A. (2020). What Does Energy Security Mean for Energy-Exporting Countries? A Closer Look at The Russian Energy Security Strategy. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 39(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2020.1794108
Nyga-Łukaszewska, H. (2019). Bezpieczeństwo Energetyczne na Międzynarodowym Rynku Gazu Ziemnego. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Paszkowski, M., & Szabaciuk, A. (2020). Zagrożenia o Charakterze Energetycznym. In T. Stępniewski (Ed.), Rosja Wobec Państw Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej: Zagrożenia Pozamilitarne (pp. 97-108). Instytut Europy Środkowej.
Pirani, S., Sharples, J., Yafimava, K., & Yermakov, V. (2020). Implications Of The Russia-Ukraine Gas Transit Deal for Alternative Pipeline Routes and The Ukrainian and European Markets. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://a9w7k6q9.stackpathcdn.com/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Insight-65-Implications-of-the-Russia-Ukraine-gas-transit-deal-for-alternative-pipeline-routes-and-the-Ukrainian-and-European-markets.pdf
President of Russia. (2019). Doktrina Energeticheskoi Bezopasnosti (Energy Security Doctrine No. 216).
Skalamera, M. (2015). Energy Security in the Wake of the Ukraine Crisis: Getting the Real Threats Right [Global Policy Essay]. Global Policy. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/sites/default/files/Skalamera%20-%20Energy%20Security%20in%20the%20Wake%20of%20the%20Ukraine%20Crisis%2C%20Getting%20the%20Real%2007.15.pdf
Socor, V. (2007). Gazprom Taking Over The Pipelines In Belarus. Eurasia Daily Monitor, 4(99).
Sovacool, B. K. (2016). Differing cultures of energy security: An international comparison of public perceptions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.144
Šumskis, V., & Giedraitis, V. (2015). Economic Implications of Energy Security in the Short Run. Ekonomika, 94(3), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2015.3.8791
Weyers, T. J. (2013). Energy security of the Baltic States [Bachelor thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra]. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/21000
Yermakov, V., & Sobczak, K. (2020). Russia-Poland Gas Relationship: Risks and Uncertainties Of The Ever After. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://a9w7k6q9.stackpathcdn.com/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Russian-Poland-gas-relationship-risks-and-uncertainties-Insight-70.pdf
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Maciej Mróz, Michał Paszkowski
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 538
Liczba cytowań: 0