The Government of Evil Machines: an Application of Romano Guardini’s Thought on Technology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2021.010

Keywords

evil, technology, AI, ethics

Abstract

In this article I propose a theological reflection on the philosophical assumptions behind the idea that intelligent machine can be governed through ethical protocols, which may apply either to the people who develop the machines or to the machines themselves, or both. This idea is particularly relevant in the case of machines’ extreme wrongdoing, a wrongdoing that becomes an existential risk for humankind. I call this extreme wrong-doing, ‘evil.’ Thus, this article is a theological account on the philosophical assumptions behind the possibility of evil machines, machines that can create an existential risk for humankind, and the ethical remedies that limit that risk. After discussing these assumptions, I argue for the ineffectiveness of these ethical remedies to prevent the possibility of evil machines. The article is an application of Romano Guardini’s thought on technology to evil machines.

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.

Arkin, Ronald C. 2009. Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Boddington, Paula. 2017. Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer.

Bostrom, Nick. 2002. “Existential Risks – Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 9: 31–33.

Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bowles, Cennydd. 2018. Future Ethics. N.d.: NowNext Press.

Calder, Todd. 2015. “Evil Persons.” Criminal Justice Ethics 34(3): 350–360.

Card, Claudia. 2002. The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cassirer, Ernst. 1985. Symbol, Technik, Sprache: Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1927–1933, edited by Ernst Wolfgang Orth & John Michael Krois. Hamburg: Meiner.

Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2020. AI Ethics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Formosa, Paul. 2008. “A Conception of Evil.” Journal of Value Inquiry 42(2): 217–239.

Guardini, Romano. 2001. The End of the Modern World, Trans. Joseph Theman and Herbert Burke. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.

Guardini, Guardini. 1994. Letters from Lake Como: Explorations in Technology and the Human Race, Trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Guardini, Romano 1993. Gläubiges Dasein: Die Annahme seiner selbst. Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag.

Gunkel, David J. 2012. The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1968. Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Die Technik und die Kehre. Pfullingen: Neske.

Haybron, Daniel. 2002. “Moral Monsters and Saints.” The Monist 85(2): 260–284.

Jaspers, Karl. 1931. Die geistige Situation der Zeit. Berlin & Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

Kekes, John. 2005. The Roots of Evil. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Lin, Patrick, Jenkins, Ryan, and Abney Keith. 2017. Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lin, Patrick and Abney, Keith. 2011. Robot Ethics and Social Implications of Robotics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “Technology and Evil.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8(2): 1–14.

Millare, Roland. 2016. “The Primacy of Logos Over Ethos: The Influence of Romano Guardini on Post-Conciliar Theology.” The Heythrop Journal 57(6): 974–983.

Pope Francis. 2015. Encyclical Letter Laudato Si, given in Rome at Saint Peter’s on May 24.

Russell, Luke. 2014. Evil: A Philosophical Investigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Russell, Stuart. 2019. Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. New York: Vikings.

Severino, Emanuele. 2016a. The Essence of Nihilism. London and New York: Verso.

Severino, Emanuele. 2016b. Nihilism and Destiny. Milan: Mimesis International.

Rimbaud, Arthur. 1879. Une saison en enfer. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. The English translation is taken from Arthur Rimbaud, Complete Works, trans. Paul Schmidt (New York: Harper and Row, 1976), http://www.mag4.net/Rimbaud/poesies/Farewell.html, accessed February 14, 2018.

Singer, Marcus G. 2004. “The Concept of Evil.” Philosophy 79(2): 185–21.

Sparrow, Robert. 2007. “Killer Robots.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(1): 62–77.

Sparrow, Robert. 2016. Robots as “Evil Means”? A Rejoinder to Jenkins and Purves. Ethics & International Affairs 30(3): 401–403.

Spengler, Oswald. 1931. Der Mensch und die Technik: Beitrag zu einer Philosophie des Lebens. München: C.H. Beck.

Szollosy, Michael. 2017. “Freud, Frankenstein and our Fear of Robots: Projection in our Cultural Perception of Technology.” AI and Society 33(3): 433–43.

Steiner, Hillel. 2002. “Calibrating Evil.” The Monist 85(2): 183–193.

Tegmark, Max. 2017. Life 3.0. Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Knopt.

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. 2010. Romano Guardini: Reform from the Source. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

Vinge, Vernor. 1993. The Coming Technological Singularity. How to Survive in the Post-Human Era. San Diego State Univ., San Diego, CA, United States. Published on December 1, 1993. Available online at https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940022856.

Wallach, Wendell and Allen, Colin. 2008. Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

Published

2021-04-09

How to Cite

1.
BELTRAMINI, Enrico. The Government of Evil Machines: an Application of Romano Guardini’s Thought on Technology. Scientia et Fides. Online. 9 April 2021. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 257-281. [Accessed 17 January 2026]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2021.010.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia et Fides

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1234
Number of citations: 1