Phenomenology of resentment according to Scheler and Girard in light of sloth in Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae
Keywordsdeadly sins, moral falsehood, Nietzsche, Scheler, Girard, Thomas Aquinas
After Friedrich Nietzsche explained the phenomenon of resentment through a supposed unmasking of a hidden emotional complex, later writers, like Max Scheler and René Girard, qualified Nietzschean analysis by applying it to various areas of anthropology and society. Many of the main contributions from these contemporary analyses find their roots in earlier authors, both modern and medieval. Six and a half centuries before Scheler, Thomas Aquinas offered in two questions of his Summa Theologiae dedicated to sloth and envy, a series of conceptual clarifications and psychological observations, which, in large part, share the same content and, at times, the form, with certain characterisations of resentment. Using many text references, we show the parallels between Schelerian phenomenology of resentment and the Thomasian explanation of the deadly sins.
Butler, Joseph. 1896. The Works of Joseph Butler. Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
DeYoung, Rebeca Konyndyk. 2014. “Sloth: Some Historical Reflections on Laziness, Effort, and Resistance to the Demands of Love.” In Virtues and Their Vices, edited by Kevin Timpe, and Craig A. Boyd, 177-198. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Droste, Klaus. 2005. “Resentimiento y Psiquismo.” Summa Psicológica. 1 (2) 3-6.
Girard, René. 1985. Mentira romántica y verdad novelesca. Barcelona: Anagrama.
La Caze, Marguerite. 2001. “Envy and Resentment.” Philosophical Explorations 4 (1) 31-45.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1971. La genealogía de la moral. Madrid: Alianza.
Pascal, Blaise. 1981. Obras. Madrid: Alfaguara.
Peretó Rivas, Rubén. 2011. “Las mutaciones de la acedia. De la Patrística a la Edad Media.” Studium. Filosofía y Teología 27:157-171.
Perrine, Timothy, and Kevin Timpe. 2014. “Envy and Its Discontents.” In Virtues and Their Vices, edited by Kevin Timpe, and Craig A. Boyd, 225-244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pieper, Josef. 1980. Las virtudes fundamentales. Madrid: Rialp.
Quesada, José Jorge. 2010. “Un maestro ruso renuente a las escuelas del resentimiento.” Estudios 94 (3) 221-230.
Scheler, Max. 1998. El resentimiento en la moral. Madrid: Caparrós Editores.
Stendhal. 2014. Rojo y negro. Crónica del siglo XIX. Crónica de 1830. Barcelona: Alba.
Teresa de Jesús. 1984. La vida. Las moradas. Barcelona: Planeta.
Tomás de Aquino. 1995. Suma de Teología. Madrid: BAC.
How to Cite
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Number of views and downloads: 23
Number of citations: 2