The dream of transcending the human through the digital matrix: A relational critique
Keywordshuman transcendence, digital technologies, personhood, dehumanization, relational sociology, relational goods
AbstractThe advent of the digital era brings with it the dream of ‘transcending the human’ through the most sophisticated AI / robot technologies. The Author argues that the concept and practices of ‘transcendence’ are deeply ambiguous, since on the one hand they simply aim to overcome the weaknesses, limits and fragility of the human, while on the other hand they modify the human by selecting its specific qualities and its causal properties in a way to generate beings ‘other than human.’ As a matter of fact, post / trans-humanist ideologies, instead of strengthening the human, lead to its dehumanization because they imply the denial of the characteristics that are uniquely human and / or those that constitute human nature. To understand when new digital technologies enhance the human or distort it, it is necessary to analyze and evaluate social processes on the basis of a relational vision that shows us which human relationships emerge from the use of technologies.
Anders, Günther. 2016. Prometheanism: Technology, Digital Culture and Human Obsolescence  New York: Rowman & Littlefield
Archer, Margaret. 2019a. “Bodies, persons and human enhancement: Why these distinctions matter.” In I. Al-Amoudi and J. Morgan (eds.). Realist Responses to Post-Human Society: Ex Machina. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 10-32.
Archer, Margaret. 2019b. “Can Human Beings and AI Robots be Friends?.” Paper delivered at the PAS-PASS conference "Robotics, AI, and Humanity: Science, Ethics, and Policy", Vatican City: May 16-17.
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2002. “The Ontological Status of Persons.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 370-388.
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2007. “Naturalism and the First-Person Perspective.’ in How Successful is Naturalism?.” Frankfurt: Ontos-Verlag, pp. 203-226.
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2013. “Technology and the Future of Persons.” The Monist 96: 37-53.
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2015. “Human Persons as Social Entities.” Journal of Social Ontology 1(1): 77-87.
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2016. “Making sense of ourselves: self-narratives and personal identity.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15: 7-15.
Bilimoria, Purushottama. 2012. “Why Is There Nothing Rather Than Something? An Essay in the Comparative Metaphysic of Nonbeing.” SOPHIA 51:509-530.
Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. The Possibility of Naturalism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Bhaskar, Roy. 2012. Reﬂections on MetaReality: Transcendence, Emancipation and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
Breslau, Daniel. 2000. “Sociology after humanism: A lesson from contemporary science studies.” Sociological Theory 18 (2): 289-307.
Cath, Corinne et al. 2017. “Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach.” Sci. Eng. Ethics published on line 28 March 2017. DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
Debaise, Didier. 2012. “What is Relational Thinking?.” Inflexions 5 : 1-11.
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2011. Relational Sociology. A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2013. “Morphogenesis and Social Networks: Relational Steering not Mechanical Feedback.” In M.S. Archer (ed.). Social Morphogenesis. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 205-231.
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2019a. The Enigma of Relation and the Theological Matrix of Society, in P. Donati, A. Malo and G. Maspero (eds.). Social Science, Philosophy and Theology in Dialogue: A Relational Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3-37.
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2019b. “Discovering the Relational Goods: Their Nature, Genesis and Effects.” International Review of Sociology/Revue international de Sociologie DOI 10.1080/03906701.2019.1619952
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2020. The Digital Matrix and the Hybridization of Society, in I. Al-Amoudi and E. Lazega eds. Post-human institutions and organisations: confronting the Matrix. Abingdon: Routledge.
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2021. “Being Human in the Digital Matrix Land.” In M. Carrigan, D. Porpora, and C. Wight (eds.). The future of the human and social relations. Abingdon: Routledge (in print).
Donati, Pierpaolo and Archer, Margaret. 2015. The Relational Subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Etzioni, Amitai and Etzioni, Oren. 2017. “Incorporating Ethics into Artificial Intelligence.” The Journal of Ethics 21(1): 1-16.
Floridi, Luciano. ed. 2015. The Onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era New York: Springer.
Gehlen, Arnold. 1974. Der Mensch. Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt . Frankfurt am Main: Athenaion Verlag.
Jones, Raya A. 2013. “Relationalism through Social Robotics.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43 (4): 405–424.
Jullien, François. 2015. De l'être au vivre. Lexique euro-chinois de la pensée. Paris: Gallimard.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
McCormack, Mark, Wignall, Liam and Morris, Max. 2016. ”Gay guys using gay language: friendship, shared values and the intent-context-effect matrix.” The British Journal of Sociology 67(4): 747-767.
Morozov, Evgenij. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here. The Folly of Technological Solutionism. Philadelphia: PublicAffairs.
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action, New York: Free Press.
Rammert, Werner. 2008. “'Where the action is: Distributed agency between humans, machines, and Programs.” Bielefeld: The Technical University Technology Studies Working Papers TUTS-WP-4.
Silver, Daniel and O’Neill, Kristie. 2014. “The significance of religious imagery in The Philosophy of Money: Money and the transcendent character of life.” European Journal of Social Theory 17(4): 389–406.
Teubner. Gunther. 2006. “Rights of Non-humans? Electronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics and Law.” Journal of Law and Society 33(4): 497-521.
Weber, Max. 1993. The Sociology of Religion . Boston: Beacon Press.
How to Cite
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Number of views and downloads: 188
Number of citations: 0