Neurobiology and free will: a dialogue between Mariano Artigas and John Eccles
Keywordsinterdisciplinarity, mind-brain, reductionism, free will
In this article, I discuss the importance of multidisciplinary research to tackle the questions that empirical sciences, and in particular neuroscience, ultimately encounter. The last decades have witnessed an enormous progress in brain research, mainly because of the improvement of neuroimaging techniques and neurogenetics, and the development of optogenetics. Furthermore, the US Government and European Union have launched the BRAIN Initiative and Human Brain Project, respectively, to promote a better understanding of brain functioning and its disorders. Unfortunately, their gates appear sealed for disciplines that pursue a deep knowledge of the mind, such as philosophy or psychology. The most probable outcome of this situation is “promissory materialism”, as Sir John Eccles warned several decades ago. I review the multidisciplinary approach of Eccles to the study of the brain and mind, especially through his relationship with Mariano Artigas. Finally, I propose that interdisciplinary research may be improved by a more solid understanding of the discipline one wants to dialogue with, and a multidisciplinary training from the beginning of the research career.
Artigas, M. 2004. Las fronteras del evolucionismo. Pamplona: Eunsa.
Artigas, M., and J. C. Eccles. 2004. “Alma humana, ciencia, religión.” In Las fronteras del evolucionismo. Pamplona: Eunsa.
Bennett, M. R., and P. M. S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Bernacer, J., and J. M. Giménez-Amaya. 2013. “On Habit Learning in Neuroscience and Free Will.” In Is Science Compatible with Free Will?, edited by A. Suarez and P. Adams, 177–193. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5212-6.
Blackmore, S. 2007. “Mind over Matter?” The Guardian - Medical Research (Opinion). https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/aug/28/mindovermatter.
Bush, G. 1990. “Project of the Decade of the Brain.” Presidential Proclamation 6158. http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html.
Calderone, J. 2014. “10 Big Ideas in 10 Years of Brain Science.” Scientific American Mind. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/10-big-ideas-in-10-years-of-brain-science/.
Eccles, J. C. 1943. “The Ionic Mechanism of Postsynaptic Inhibition.” In Nobel Lecture. Stockholm.
Eccles, J. C. 1965. The Brain and the Unity of Conscious Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eccles, J. C. 1970. Facing Reality: Philosophical Adventures of a Brain Scientist. New York: Springer Verlag.
Eccles, J. C., and D. N. Robinson. 1984. The Wonder of Being Human. London: Collier Macmillan.
Hyman, S. E. 1998. “NIMH during the Tenure of Director Steven E. Hyman, M.D. (1996-Present): The Now and Future of NIMH.” American Journal of Psychiatry 155(9 Suppl): 36–40.
Libet, Benjamin. 1985. “Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8:529-566. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00044903.
Libet, B., C. A. Gleason, E. W. Wright, and D. K. Pearl. 1983. “Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential).” Brain 106:623–642.
Miller, G. A. 2010. “Mistreating Psychology in the Decades of the Brain.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(6):716–743. doi:10.1177/1745691610388774.Mistreating.
Murillo, J. I., and J. M. Giménez-Amaya. 2008. “Tiempo, conciencia y libertad: Consideraciones en torno a los experimentos de B. Libet y colaboradores.” Acta Philosophica 11(17):291–306.
Schultze-Kraft, M., D. Birman, M. Rusconi, C. Allefeld, K. Görgen, S. Dähne, B. Blankertz, and J. D. Haynes. 2015. “The Point of No Return in Vetoing Self-Initiated Movements.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(4):1080–85. doi:10.1073/pnas.1513569112.
How to Cite
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Number of views and downloads: 185
Number of citations: 0