In search of the person. Towards a real revolution
Keywordsneuroscience, ontology, anthropology, intensional logic
The discussion about a difference between brain and soul or mind is now at the center of the anthropological debate. It seems that the pioneers in this current polemic have a reductionistic view of human nature, inherited from the Cartesian solution to mind-body problem and the modern materialistic explanation of reality. This view – dualistic or monistic – about the opposition between material and immaterial structure of the person, claims that as a consequence of scientific progress, the human brain in the future could be completely explained in naturalistic terms. On the other hand, according to the new results of scientific research, this situation reveals the possibility to develop a new, more adequate paradigm of man as an incarnated person. This change was called by many researchers “the passage from the mind-body problem to the person-body problem”. It seems that the Aristotelian-Thomistic approach is the most suitable to describe this “paradigm shift”. Aristotelian-Thomistic philosophy undoubtedly encourages lively dialogue between philosophy and contemporary sciences through its dual ontology. Thus, it can give suitable answers for questions about the nature of human reason (intentionality); unity of composition of the human brain and the role of causality in natural processes.
Aristotle, Physics. R.P. Hardie and R.K. Gaye (trans.), University of Adelaide, (https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/physics/).
Basti, G. 1991. La relazione mente-corpo nella filosofia e nella scienza. Roma.
Basti, G. & Perrone, A. L. 1995. “Chaotic neural nets, computability, undecidability. An outlook of computational dynamics.” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 10 (1995): 41–69.
Basti, G. & Perrone, A. L. 2001. “Intentionality and Foundations of Logic: a New Approach to Neurocomputation” in What should be computed to understand and model brain function? From Robotics, Soft Computing, Biology and Neuroscience to Cognitive Philosophy, T. Kitamura (ed.), 239–288. Singapore–New York: World Publishing.
Basti, G. & Perrone, A. L. 2002. “Neural nets and the puzzle of intentionality” in Neural Nets. WIRN Vietri-01. Proceedings of 12th Italian Workshop on Neural Nets, Vietrisul Mare, Salerno, Italy, 17–19 May 2001, R. Tagliaferri & M. Marinaro (eds.), Berlin, London: Springer.
Basti, G. 2002. Filosofia della Natura e della Scienza. Vol. I: I Fondamenti. Roma: Lateran University Press.
Basti, G. 2005. “Il problema mente-corpo e la questione dell’intenzionalità” in L. Lenzi (ed.), 161–199. Neurofisiologia e teoria della mente. Vita e Pensiero: Milano.
Basti, G. 2007. “Ontologia formale: per una metafisica post-moderna” in A. Strumia (ed.) Il problema dei fondamenti. Da Aristotele, a Tommaso d’Aquino, all’ontologia formale. Siena: Cantagalli.
Basti, G. 2008. Filosofia dell’uomo. Roma.
Basti, G. 2009. “Logica della scoperta e paradigma intenzionale nelle scienze cognitive” in Quale scienza per la psicoterapia? Atti del III Congresso nazionale della SEPI (Society for the Exploration of Psychotherapy Integration). T. Carere-Comes (ed.), 183–216. Florence Art Edition. Firenze.
Basti, G. 2012. “Dualità, epigenesi, intenzionalità: dal mente-corpo al persona corpo.” Divus Thomas 115 (2012): 29–89.
Basti, G. 2012-2. “Dal mente-corpo al persona-corpo: il paradigma intenzionale delle scienze cognitive” in E la coscienza? Fenomenologia, psico-patologia e neuroscienze, A. Ales-Bello, P. Manganaro (eds.), 523–634. G. Laterza, Bari.
Basti, G. 2013. “Persona, intersoggettività, realtà: i tre pilastri della relazione di cura” in Atti di Convegno Psicoterapia e Counseling: Comunanze e differenze, T. Carere-Comes, C. Montanari (eds.), 59–107. ASPIC Edizioni scientifiche. Roma.
Basti, G. 2014. “Neuroetica e antropologia.” Camillianum XIV (41): 221–268.
Basti, G. 2015. “Ontologia formale: uno strumento per il dialogo interculturale e interdisciplinare” in Ontologia formale, G. Basti, Sh. Mobeen (eds.), 13–137. Roma.
Basti, G. 2016. “QFT: An evolutionary interpretation of nature from cosmology to Neuroscience”. Accessed February 20, 2016. www.irafs.org/courses/materials/qft_lecture_note.pdf
Bunge, M. 1980. The Mind-Body Problem. Oxford.
Clark, A. “Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents and the future of cognitive science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (2013): 181–204.
Cortez, M. 2010. Theological anthropology: A Guide for the Perplexed. London–New York: T&t Clark – Bloomsbury.
Cocchiarella, N.B. 2007. Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism. Berlin–New York.
Damasio, A.R. 1994. Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason and the human brain. Putnam’s Sons. New York.
Damasio, A.R. 2010. Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. Heinemann. London.
Davies, P. 2010. “Universe from bit” in Information and the nature of reality. From physics to metaphysics, P. Davies, N.H. Gregersen (ed.), 65–91. Cambridge UP.
Donnellan, K.S. 1966. “Reference and definite descriptions.” Philosophical Review 75: 281–304.
Fodor, J.A. 1980. The language of thought. Cambridge MA: Harvard UP.
Fodor, J.A. 2001. The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way. The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J.A. 2008. LOT2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford, New York: Oxford UP.
Freeman, W.J. 2001. How Brains Make Up Their Minds. Columbia University Press: New York.
Hofstdater, D.R. 1984. Gödel, Escher, Bach. Un’eterna ghirlanda brillante. Adelphi, Milano (first print 1977).
Kaplan, D. 1978. “Dthat.” In Syntax and semantics 9: pragmatics, P. Cole (ed.), 221–243. New York: Academic Press.
Koyré, A. 1980. Introduzione a Platone. Vellecchi. Firenze.
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, C.I. “Implication and the Algebra of Logic.” Mind 21 (1912): 522–531.
Lewis, C.I, Langford C.H. 1932. Symbolic Logic. Century Compan, New York (reprint in 2nd Edition, Dover Publications, New York 1959).
Maritain, J. 1974. Distinguere per unire. I gradi di sapere. Brescia.
McKay, D.M. 1980. “The interdependence of mind and brain.” Neuroscience 5: 1389–1391.
Newton, I. 1704. Optice. Translation by S. Clarke. Losanna–Ginevra.
Perrone, A.L. 1995. “A formal Scheme to Avoid Undecidable Problems. Applications to Chaotic Dynamics Characterization and Parallel Computation” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, n. 888, 9–48. Berlin–New York: Springer.
Perrone, A. L., Basti, G., Messi, R., Paoluzi, L., & Picozza, P. 1995. “Principles of computational dynamics: applications to parallel and neural computations” in Applications of Artificial Neural Networks. SPIE Proceeding Series, 2492, S.K. Rogers & D.W. Ruck (eds.), 368–372. Bellingham.
Popper, K.R., Eccles, J.C. 1977. The Self and its Brain. Berlin–New York.
Penrose, R. 1994. Shadows of the Mind. A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford UP.
Putnam, H. 1960. “Minds and Machines” in Dimension of mind, S. Hook (ed.). New York: Collier.
Putnam, H. 1975. Philosophical Papers II: mind, language and reality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Putnam, H. 1988. Representation and reality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Ryle, G. 1951. The concept of mind. London.
Quine, W.V. 1987. Quidditties. An intermittently philosophical dictionary. Cambridge MA: Harvard UP.
Rizzolatti, G., Sinigaglia, C. 2006. So quel che fai. Il cerevello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
Salmon, N. 2005. Reference and essence. New York: Prometeus Book.
Searle, J.R. 1980. “Mind, brains and programs. A debate on artificial intelligence.” The Behavioral and Brain Science 3: 128–135.
Searle, J.R. 1983. Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. New York: Cambridge UP.
Searle, J.R. 1994. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Massachusetts.
Searle, J.R. 2004. Mind: A Brief Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J.R. 2007. Freedom and neurobiology. Reflections on free will, language and political power. New York: Columbia University Press.
Thomas Aquinas, 1947. The Summa Theologica. Benziger Bros. edition. Translatedby Fathers of the English Dominican Province (http://dhspriory.org/thomas/summa/).
Wheeler, J.A. 1990. “Information, physics, quantum: The search for links” in Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information, W.H. Zurek (ed.). Addison–Wesley, Redwood City.
Wheeler, J.A. 1992. “Recent thinking about the nature of the physical world: It from bit” in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 655, 349–364. New York.
Woźniak, R.J. “Materialno-biologiczny wymiar obrazu Bożego w człowieku.” Scientia et Fides 2 (2)/2014: 271–288.
How to Cite
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Number of views and downloads: 278
Number of citations: 9