Religion and Emotions Towards Artificial Intelligence: Christians, Non-Christians and Non-Believers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2025.005Keywords
religiosity, religion, artificial intelligence, post-secularism, emotional response, ethical & moral AI designAbstract
The article aims to determine what is the relationship between someone’s religious affiliation and their emotional reaction(s) in relation to artificial intelligence (AI). Religion is an important element of society’s cultural mosaic, and it undoubtedly influences emotional reactions to AI. This constitutes a premise for examining how one’s religion can influence attitudes toward AI. The research applied an ANOVA variation analysis comparing the emotional reactions of students toward AI depending on their declared religious belonging. This allowed the identification of different emotional responses, such as fear, sadness and anger, among Christian, non-Christian and non-religious participants. The analysis reveals that there are significant differences in the emotional reception of AI between followers of various religions and those declaring themselves as not religious with varied responses in the latter group. Christians display moderate emotions toward AI, with a slight predominance of positive reactions. Non-Christians express slightly more intense feelings, both positive and negative. Non-believers exhibit the greatest variety of emotions with the greatest intensity. The results point to the need of taking religion into account in the process of designing and implementing AI. This may contribute to a greater acceptance of technology in religiously and culturally pluralistic societies.
References
Akaliyski, Plamen. 2023. “Distinct Conceptions of Freedom in East Asia and the Protestant West Underpin Unique Pathways of Societal Development.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 54 (2): 173–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221143320
Amponsah, Peter N., and Atianashie Miracle Atianashie. 2024. “Navigating the New Frontier: A Comprehensive Review of AI in Journalism.” Advances in Journalism and Communication 12 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2024.121001.
Aoki, Naomi. 2020. “An Experimental Study of Public Trust in AI Chatbots in the Public Sector.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490.
Bedyńska, Sylwia, and Marzena Cypriańska. 2013. Statystyczny drogowkaz 2. Praktyczne wprowadzenie do analizy wariancji [Statistical Signpost 2. Practical Introduction to Analysis of Variance]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno; Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej.
Berger, Peter. 2007. “Religion und europäische Integration. Bemerkungen aus Amerika [Religion and European Integration. Remarks from America].” In Woran glaubt Europa? Religion und politische Kultur im neuen Europa [What does Europe Believe in? Religion and Political Culture in the New Europe], edited by Krzysztof Michalski, 229–239. Wien: Passagen Verlag.
Campbell, Heidi A., and Giulia Evolvi. 2020. “Contextualizing Current Digital Religion Research on Emerging Technologies.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149.
Castells, Manuel. 2000. “Toward a Sociology of the Network Society.” Contemporary Sociology 29 (5): 693–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2655234.
Cheong, Pauline Hope. 2021. “Bounded Religious Automation at Work: Communicating Human Authority in Artificial Intelligence Networks.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 45 (1): 5–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859920977133.
Ciarrocchi, Joseph W., and Erin Deneke. 2006. “Hope, Optimism, Pessimism, and Spirituality as Predictors of Well-Being Controlling for Personality.” In Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, edited by Ralph L. Piedmont, 161–183. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047417675_013.
Fel, Stanisław, and Kamil Michaluk. 2023. “Religious Grammar of the Welfare State in Poland.” Religions 14 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010081.
Fel, Stanisław, Marek Wódka, and Magdalena Zdun. 2019. Aksjologiczne podstawy ładu społeczno-gospodarczego [An Axiological Foundations of Socio-Economic Order]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333489370_Aksjologiczne_podstawy_ladu_spoleczno-gospodarczego.
Francis. 2015. Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ on Care for Our Common Home. Vatican: Holy See. https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html.
Frey, Carl Benedikt, and Michael A. Osborne. 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisations? Oxford: University of Oxford. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/future-of-employment.pdf.
Gentili, Pier Luigi, and Pasquale Stano. 2023. “Tracing a New Path in the Field of AI and Robotics: Mimicking Human Intelligence Through Chemistry. Part I: Molecular and Supramolecular Chemistry.” Front Robot AI 10: 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffrobt.2023.1238492.
Geraci, Robert M. 2008. “Apocalyptic AI: Religion and the Promise of Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76 (1): 138–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfm101.
Geraci, Robert M. 2020. “A Hydra-Logical Approach: Acknowledging Complexity in the Study of Religion, Science, and Technology.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 55 (4): 948–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12650.
Gould, Hannah, and Holly Walters. 2020. “Bad Buddhists, Good Robots: Techno-Salvationist Designs for Nirvana.” Journal of Global Buddhism 21: 277–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4147487.
Gray, Kurt, Kai Chi Yam, Alexander Eng Zhen’An, Danica Wilbanks, and Adam Waytz. 2023. “The Psychology of Robots and Artificial Intelligence.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske and Gardner Lindzey, 1–144. Cambridge, MA: Situational Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370321876_The_Psychology_of_Robots_and_Artificial_Intelligence.
GUS. 2023. Szkolnictwo wyższe w roku akademickim 2022/2023 [Higher Education in the Academic Year 2022/2023]. Vol. March 17, 2024. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/edukacja/edukacja/szkolnictwo-wyzsze-w-roku-akademickim-20222023-wynikiwstepne,8,9.html.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Han, Sam. 2016. Technologies of Religion: Spheres of the Sacred in a Post-secular Modernity. London, New York: Routledge. https://books.google.pl/books?hl=pl&lr=lang_en&id=fWuFCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=In+the+post-secular+era,+even+people+without+religious+-beliefs+can+seek+deeper+meaning+and+value+in+their+relationship+with+technology&ots=9g9PHpBDZ7&sig=s1vzU0JWdYijy2TeHl1Q1WlwKMM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
HESA. 2023. Who’s Studying in HE? Vol. March 17, 2024. Cheltenham: Higher Education Statistics Agency. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/whos-in-he.
Hinsdale, Mary Ann, and Stephen Okey, eds. 2021. T&T Clark Handbook of Theological Anthropology. London, New York, Dublin: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ho, Manh-Tung, Peter Mantello, Nader Ghotbi, Minh-Hoang Nguyen, Hong-Kong T. Nguyen, and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2022. “Rethinking Technological Acceptance in The Age of Emotional AI: Surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) Attitudes Toward Non-Conscious Data Collection.” Technology in Society 70: 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102011.
Hułas, Maciej. 2015. “Życie publiczne i moralność [Public Life and Morality].” In Leksykon socjologii moralności [Lexicon of the Sociology of Morality], edited by Janusz Mariański, 966–973. Kraków: Nomos.
Hułas, Maciej. 2023. „Dostrzegać szersze związki. O filozofii społecznej Stanisława Janeczka i Anny Starościc [Discerning Wider Connections. On The “Social Philosophy” by Stanisław Janeczek and Anna Starościc].” Annals of Social Sciences/Roczniki Nauk Społecznych 15 (4): 21–37. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rns2023.0049.
Igarashi, Tasuku, Yoshihisa Kashima, Emiko S. Kashima, Tomas Farsides, Uichol Kim, Fritz Strack, Lioba Werth, and Masaki Yuki. 2008. “Culture, Trust, and Social Networks.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 11 (1): 88–101.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00246.x.
Ikari, Shogo, Kosuke Sato, Emily Burdett, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Jonathan Jong, and Yo Nakawake. 2023. “Religion-Related Values Differently Influence Moral Attitude for Robots in the United States and Japan.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 54 (6-7): 742-759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221231193369.
Isański, Jakub, Marek Nowak, Jarosław Kozak, and John Eade. 2023. “The New Parochialism? Polish Migrant Catholic Parishes on the Path of Change.” Review of Religious Research 1 (4): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034673X231171040.
Jabłoński, Arkadiusz. 2023. “O potrzebie myślenia filozoficznego [On the Need for Philosophical Thinking].” In Młodzież w świecie myślenia i poznania [Youth in the World of Thinking and Cognition], edited by Tomasz Peciakowski, 167-178. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych. https://open.icm.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/d484f3f5-84e4-4f7d-be34-60bf57d3d6e5/content.
Jackelén, Antje. 2021. “Technology, Theology, And Spirituality in the Digital Age.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 56 (1): 6-18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12682.
Jackson, Joshua Conrad, Kai Chi Yam, Pok Man Tang, Ting Liu, and Azim Shariff. 2023. “Exposure to Robot Preachers Undermines Religious Commitment.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General: 3344-3358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001443.
Karataş, Mustafa, and Keisha M. Cutright. 2023. “Thinking About God Increases Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Decision-Making.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (33): 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218961120.
Kozak, Jaroslaw, and Stanislaw Fel. 2024. “The Relationship between Religiosity Level and Emotional Responses to Artificial Intelligence in University Students.” Religions 15 (3): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030331.
Kozak, Jarosław. 2014. Dzieci postmoderny? Studium socjologiczne nad religijnością studentów [Postmodern Children? A Sociological Study on the Religiosity of Students]. Sandomierz: Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne i Drukarnia. https://repozytorium.kul.pl/bitstream/20.500.12153/2759/4/Kozak_Jaroslaw_Dzieci_postmoderny_Studium_socjologiczne_nad_religijnoscia_studentow.pdf.
Lafont, Cristina. 2020. “Religion in the Public Sphere: Remarks on Habermas’s Conception of Public Deliberation in Postsecular Societies.” In Habermas and Law, edited by Hugh Baxter, 277-298. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074977.
Lodha, Pragya. 2024. “The Ethical Dilemma of Using Robotics in Psychotherapy.” In Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Blockchain and 5G for the Digital Transformation of the Healthcare Industry, edited by Patricia Ordóñez De Pablos and Xi Zhang, 437-446. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21598-8.00015-4.
MacDorman, Karl F., and Steven O. Entezari. 2015. “Individual Differences Predict Sensitivity to the Uncanny Valley.” Interaction Studies 16 (2): 141–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.2.01mac.
Mariański, Janusz. 2010. Religia w społeczeństwie ponowoczesnym [Religion in Postmodern Society]. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Mariański, Janusz. 2024. Rodzina – co się z nią dzieje? Opinie i poglądy polskiej młodzieży. Studium socjologiczne [Family – What’s Happening to It? Opinions and Views of Polish Youth. A Sociological Study]. Lublin: Akademia Nauk Społecznych i Medycznych w Lublinie. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378567221_Rodzina_-_co_sie_z_nia_dzieje_Opinie_i_poglady_polskiej_mlodziezy_Studium_socjologiczne.
Moniz, Jorge Botelho. 2023. “Secularization in Europe: Causes, Consequences, and Cultural Diversity.” Religions 14 (3): 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030423.
Nieuważny, Jagna, Fumito Masui, Michal Ptaszynski, Rafal Rzepka, and Karol Nowakowski. 2020. “How Religion and Morality Correlate in Age of Society 5.0: Statistical Analysis of Emotional and Moral Associations with Buddhist Religious Terms Appearing on Japanese Blogs.” Cognitive Systems Research 59: 329-344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.09.026.
Robinson, Matthew Ryan. 2023. “What Are We Talking About When We Talk About The (Post)Secular? Recentering Mutual Participation and a Commitment to Communicability in Scholarly Discussions of Contemporary Religions.” Dialog 62 (1): 51-65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12785.
Saragih, Denni Boy. 2023. “The Priesthood of All Sentients? The Eclipse of Transcendence in an Age of Artificial Intelligence.” Veritas: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan 22 (2): 235-245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v22i2.597.
Seo-Young, Cho. 2018. “Social Capital and Innovation: Can Social Trust Dxplain the Technological Innovation of the High-Performing East Asian Eonomies?” MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics 30: 1-25. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/200686.
Soler, Urszula, Joanna Ejdys, Bohdan Rożnowski, and Grzegorz Adamczyk. 2023. Postawy Polaków wobec nowych technologii. Znajomość tematyki pola elektromagnetycznego i emocje związane z PEM [Attitudes of Poles Towards New Technologies: Awareness of Electromagnetic Field Issues and Emotions Associated with EMF]. Warszawa, Lublin: Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji& Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. https://badzwzasiegu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Raport-KUL-PIIT-Postawy-Polakow-wobec-nowych-technologii.pdf.
Song, Bing. 2023. “How Chinese Philosophy Imacts AI Narratives and Imagined AI Futures.” In Imagining AI. How th World Sees Intelligent Machines, edited by Stephen Cave and Kanta Dihal, 338-352. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.pl/books?hl=pl&lr=lang_en&id=oIW9EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA338&dq=Eastern+traditions,+religions:+openness+and+fears+to+new+technologies,+AI&ots=m21OT1h9-M&sig=srRJcXdM3jq7srUhF2VoQuovt84&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Tadeja, Sławomir K., Timoleon Kipouros, Yupu Lu, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2021. “Supporting Decision Making in Engineering Design Using Parallel Coordinates in Virtual Reality.” AIAA Journal 59 (12): 5332-5346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060441.
Tran, Khoa, and Tuyet Nguyen. 2021. “Preliminary Research on the Social Attitudes toward AI’s Involvement in Christian Education in Vietnam: Promoting AI Technology for Religious Education.” Religions 12 (3): 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12030208.
Trotta, Susanna, Deborah Sabrina Iannotti, and Boris Rähme. 2024. “Religious Actors and Artificial Intelligence: Examples from the Field and Suggestions for Further Research.” Religion and Development: 1-25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30965/27507955-20230027.
Trovato, Gabriele, Franco Pariasca, Renzo Ramirez, Javier Cerna, Vadim Reutskiy, Laureano Rodriguez, and Francisco Cuellar. 2019. “Communicating With SanTO: The First Catholic Robot.” 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 14–18 Oct. 2019.
Vergeer, Maurice. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence in the Dutch Press: An Analysis of Topics and Trends.” Communication Studies 71 (3): 373-392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1733038.
Wieczorkowska, Grażyna, and Jerzy Wierzbiński. 2011. Statystyka. Analiza badań społecznych [Statistics. Social Research Analysis]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Wodka, Marek, Stanislaw Fel, Beata Zarzycka, and Jaroslaw Kozak. 2022. “How Does the Catholic Clergy Influence What Poles in the UK Know and Think about Brexit?” Religions 13 (1): 1-13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13010045.
Wosk, Julie. 2024. Artificial Women: Sex Dolls, Robot Caregivers, and More Facsimile Females. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. https://www.foyles.co.uk/book/artificial-women/julie-wosk/9780253069252.
Yam, Kai Chi, Tiffany Tan, Joshua Conrad Jackson, Azim Shariff, and Kurt Gray. 2023. “Cultural Differences in People’s Reactions and Applications of Robots, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence.” Management and Organization Review 19 (5): 859-875. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2023.21.
Younis, Hussain A., Taiseer Abdalla Elfadil Eisa, Maged Nasser, Thaeer Mueen Sahib, Ameen A. Noor, Osamah Mohammed Alyasiri, Sani Salisu, Israa M. Hayder, and Hameed AbdulKareem Younis. 2024. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Medicine and Healthcare: Applications, Considerations, Limitations, Motivation and Challenges.” Diagnostics 14 (1): 1-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010109.
Zarzycka, Beata. 2017. Zmagania religijne. Uwarunkowania i funkcje. [Religious struggles. Determinants and functions]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Zarzycka, Beata, and Anna Tychmanowicz. 2015. Wiara i siła: religijność w procesach koherencji [Faith and Strength: Religiosity in Coherence Processes]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Zdun, Magdalena. 2016. Innowacje. Perspektywa społeczno-kulturowa [Innovations: A Socio-Cultural Perspective]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Zdun, Magdalena, and Stanisław Fel. 2020. „Judaism–Protestantism–Catholicism: Religious Paths of Economic Initiative.” Roczniki Nauk Społecznych 45 (2): 139-154. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rns.2017.45.2-9.
Zheng, Yutong. 2024. “Buddhist Transformation in the Digital Age: AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Humanistic Buddhism.” Religions 15 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010079.
Zusman, Jose Alberto , Elie Cheniaux, and Sergio De Freitas. 2007. “Psychoanalysis and Change: Between Curiosity and Faith.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 88 (1): 113-125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1516/FPX7-DEA7-RAXM-DFBA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jaroslaw Kozak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 258
Number of citations: 0
