Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Council
    • Reviewers
    • Review process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Ethical Standards
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Privacy Statement
    • Archiving policy
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Scientia et Fides

Why Biological Evolution Should Inspire Worship
  • Home
  • /
  • Why Biological Evolution Should Inspire Worship
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): The Dynamic Theodicy Model: Understanding God, Evil, and Evolution /
  4. Articles

Why Biological Evolution Should Inspire Worship

Authors

  • Graeme Finlay University of Auckland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8853-8187

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2024.009

Keywords

endogenous retrovirus, transposable element, comparative genomics, randomness, creation, worship

Abstract

The theory of biological evolution has often provoked disagreement, which has frequently been divisive and counterproductive. At other times this scientific paradigm has been discussed with an apologetic intent, to explain why the science of biology and the theology of creation cannot be seen to be mutually exclusive. This paper urges Christians to move decisively to a third type of discourse. The new field of comparative genetics has provided conclusive evidence that biological evolution has given rise to the diversity of living forms, including human beings. Consequently, Christians should, with confidence, gladly accept the evolutionary paradigm and look upon evolution as a divinely ordained historical process that develops through random (stochastic, free) process, but that leads to a divinely purposed consummation. As a result, biological history in its freedom but directedness to God’s final purposes should elicit wonder. People who have come to faith in the God revealed redemptively in Jesus should uninhibitedly offer adoration and praise for evolutionary fruitfulness. Worship should characterise the human response to biological history.[1]

 

[1] In appreciation of Professor Tom McLeish FRS, scientist, teacher, theologian.

References

Alexander, Denis, ed. 2019. Has Science Killed God? London: SPCK.

Alvarez-Carretero, Sandra, Asif U. Tamuri, Matteo Battini et al. 2022. “A specieslevel timeline of mammal evolution integrating phylogenomic data.” Nature 602: 263–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04341-1.

Amici, David R., Harun Cingoz, Milad J. Alasady et al. 2023. “The HAPSTR2 retrogene buffers stress signaling and resilience in mammals.” Nature Communications 14: article 152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35697-1.

Ashby, Roland, Chris Mulherin, John Pilbrow, and Stephen Ames, eds. 2018.

A Reckless God? Currents and Challenges in the Christian Conversation with Science. Reservoir Victoria: ISCAST Nexus.

Briggs, Andrew, Hans Halvorson, and Andrew Steane. 2018. It Keeps Me Seeking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brooke, John Hedley. 1991. Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brueggemann, Walter, 1997. Theology of the Old Testament. Minneapolis: Augsburg.

Collins, Francis S. 2006. The Language of God. New York: Free Press.

Conway Morris, Simon. 2015. The Runes of Evolution. Conshohocken: Templeton.

Du, Alan Y., Xiaoyu Zhuo, Vasavi Sundaram et al. 2022. “Functional characterization of enhancer activity during a long terminal repeat’s evolution.” Genome Research 32: 1840–51. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.276863.122.

Du, Cui, Jing Jiang, Yuzhuo Li et al. 2023. “Regulation of endogenous retrovirus–derived regulatory elements by GATA2/3 and MSX2 in human trophoblast stem cells.” Genome Research 33: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.277150.122.

Falcke, Heino, 2021. Light in the Darkness. London: Wildfire.

Finlay, Graeme. 2022. God’s Gift of Science. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

Foley, Nicole M., Victor C. Mason, Andrew J. Harris et al. 2023. “A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution.” Science 380: eabl8189. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl8189.

Hanes, Jonathan M. 2021. Review of “The Bible & Ancient Science: Principles of Interpretation” by Denis O. Lamoureux, https://iscast.org/reviews/reviewof-the-bible-ancient-science-principles-of-interpretation-by-denis-o-lamoureux/.

Harrison, Peter. 2021. “Religion and the rise of science.” https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Faraday-Paper-21-Harrison-web.pdf.

Hutchings, David, and Tom McLeish. 2017. Let there be Science. Oxford: Lion.

Jeeves, Malcolm, ed. 2011. Rethinking Human Nature. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

Kuderna, Lukas F.K., Hong Gao, Mareike C. Janiak et al. 2023. “A global catalog of whole-genome diversity from 233 primate species.” Science 380: 906–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7829.

McLeish, Tom. 2014. Faith and Wisdom in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McLeish, Tom, 2020. “Evolution as an unwrapping of the gift of freedom.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2: 43–64. https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2020.014.

Naesens, Leslie, Santoshi Muppala, Dhiraj Acharya et al. 2022. “GTF3A mutations predispose to Herpes Simplex encephalitis by disrupting biogenesis of the host-derived RIG-I ligand RNA5SP141,” Science Immunology 7: eabq4531.https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abq4531.

Nikaido, Masato, Hidenori Nishihara and Norihiro Okada. 2022. “SINEs as credible signs to prove common ancestry in the tree of life: a brief review of pioneering case studies in retroposon systematics.” Genes 13: 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060989.

Osborn, Lawrence. 1993. Guardians of Creation. Leicester: Apollos.

Phillips, Rob. 2021. “Schrodinger’s What is Life? at 75.” Cell Systems 12: 465–76.

Polkinghorne, John. 2004. Science and the Trinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pontis, Julien, Cyril Pulver, Christopher J. Playfoot et al. 2022. “Primate-specific transposable elements shape transcriptional networks during human development.” Nature Communications 13: 7178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34800-w.

Rodriguez-Martin, Bernando, Eva G. Alvarez, Adrian Baez-Ortega et al. 2020. “Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes identifies driver rearrangements promoted by LINE-1 retrotransposition,” Nature Genetics 52: 306–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0562-0.

Rolston, Holmes IIII. 1999. Genes, Genesis and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rowley, Paul A., Aisha Ellahi, Kyudong Han et al. 2021. “Nuku, a family of primate retrocopies derived from KU70.” G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 11: jkab163.https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab163.

Rudwick, Martin J.S. 2014. Earth’s Deep History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Steane, Andrew. 2014. Faithful to Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wagner, Roger and Andrew Briggs. 2016. The Penultimate Curiosity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

White, Robert S. 2022. Natural Disasters and Human Responsibility, https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Faraday-Paper-25-Whitev4.pdf.

Wright, N.T. 2014. Surprised by Scripture. London: SPCK.

Wright, N.T. and Michael F. Bird. 2019. The New Testament in its World. London: SPCK.

Scientia et Fides

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2024-04-09

How to Cite

1.
FINLAY, Graeme. Why Biological Evolution Should Inspire Worship. Scientia et Fides. Online. 9 April 2024. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 163-188. [Accessed 28 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2024.009.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): The Dynamic Theodicy Model: Understanding God, Evil, and Evolution

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Graeme

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.

  • The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
  • Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
  • The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.

FULL TEXT License Agreement

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 527
Number of citations: 0

ISSN/eISSN

ISSN: 2300-7648

eISSN: 2353-5636

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

endogenous retrovirus, transposable element, comparative genomics, randomness, creation, worship
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop