The Dialogical Self Analogy for the Godhead: Recasting the “God is a Person” Debate
KeywordsTrinity, Person, Personalism, Dialogical Self Theory, Dialogical, Analogy, God
May God may be understood and referred to as a “person”? This is a live debate in contemporary theological and philosophical circles. However, despite the attention this debate has received, the vital question of how to account for God’s trinitarian nature has been mostly overlooked. Due to trinitarian concerns about the unqualified use of “person” as an analogy for the Godhead, I intervene in this debate with a two-fold proposal. The first is that proponents of using a person as an analogy for the Godhead will be better served by using a psychologically informed analogy of a “self” instead. In particular, the Dialogical Self model of a person holds much promise. In what follows, I argue that the “Dialogical Self Analogy” for the Godhead is more likely to uphold God’s trinitarian nature, avoid trinitarian confusion and related problems than “person” analogies do. The primary benefit of speaking of God as a Dialogical Self is that it offers a psychologically modelled analogy for God, whilst avoiding the language of person, yet strongly taking into account God’s trinitarian nature. This has the important benefit of preserving the concept and language of “person” for the trinitarian persons (the prosopa/hypostases), and hence avoiding the linguistic, conceptual and ecumenical confusion that arises when referring to the Godhead as a person. The strength of using the model and language of a Dialogical Self as an analogy for the Godhead (instead of person) is demonstrated by showing its compatibility with Erickson’s criteria for describing the Trinity.
Augustine. The Trinity. 1963. The Fathers of the Church, a New Translation. Washington, DC: CUA Press.
Augustine. Confessions. 2018. Trans. Sarah Ruden. New York, NY: Modern Library.
Augustine. ‘Letters CLXIX – Bishop Augustine to Bishop Evodius.’ Christian Classics Ethereal Library. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf101.vii.1.CLXIX.html
Baumert, Anna, Manfred Schmitt, Marco Perugini, Wendy Johnson, Gabriela Blum, Peter Borkenau, Giulio Costantini, et al. 2017. “Integrating Personality Structure, Personality Process, and Personality Development.” European Journal of Personality 31: 503–528.
Belzen, Jacob A. 2010. “Religion and Self: Notions from a Cultural Psychological Perspective.” Pastoral Psychology 59: 399–409.
Burns, Elizabeth. 2015. “Classical and Revisionary Theism on the Divine as Personal: A Rapprochement?”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78: 151-165.
Cole, Graham A. 2016. “Personalism.” In New Dictionary of Theology, edited by Martin Davie, Tim Grass, Stephen R. Holmes, John McDowell and T.A. Noble, 667. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.
Erickson, Millard J. 1998. Christian Theology. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
Eze, C., G.C. Lindegger, and S. Rakoczy. 2015. “Catholic Religious Sisters’ Identity Dilemmas as Committed and Subjugated Workers: A Narrative Approach.” Review of Religious Research 57(3): 397-417.
Frame, John M. 2002. The Doctrine of God. A Theology of Lordship. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Pub.
Grimi, Elisa. 2018. “Reasons for Theism of the Person Side Notes to Pouivet’s: Against Theistic Personalism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10(2): 195-208.
Harrower, Scott. 2014. “A Relational-Historical ‘Limit Case’ Proposal for Meaningful Discourse About God.” The Pacific Journal of Baptist Research 9(2): 25–47.
Harrower, Scott. 2019. God of All Comfort: A Trinitarian Response to the Horrors of This World. Eugene, OR: Lexham Press.
Harrower, Scott. Forthcoming. “¿Es Dios una persona plural?”. In O’Reilly, Francisco and Franck, Juan F. (eds.), ¿Es Dios persona? Aproximaciones a la discusión sobre la naturaleza de Dios.
Hasker, William. 2013. Metaphysics and the Tri-Personal God. Oxford Studies in Analytic Theology. First edition.
Hasker, William. 2018. “Can a Latin Trinity Be Social? A Response to Scott M. Williams.” Faith and Philosophy 35(3): 356-366.
Herman, Judith Lewis. 2001. Trauma and Recovery: From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. London: Basic Books.
Hermans-Konopka, Agnieszka. 2012. “The Depositioning of the I: Emotional Coaching in the Context of Transcendental Awareness.” In Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory, edited by Hubert J.M. Hermans and Thorsten Gieser, 423-438. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, Hubert J. M. 2001. “The Dialogical Self: Toward a Theory of Personal and Cultural Positioning.” Culture & Psychology 7: 243-281.
Hermans, Hubert J. M. 2002. “The Dialogical Self as a Society of Mind: Introduction.” Theory & Psychology 12(2): 47-160.
Hermans, Hubert J. M. 2011. “The Dialogical and the Imaginal.” In Jungian and Dialogical Self Perspectives, edited by Masayoshi Morioka and Raya A. Jones, 2-18. London: Pelgrave.
Hermans, Hubert J. M. 2020. “Editors’ Introduction: Radicalization and Deradicalization from the Perspective of Dialogical Self Theory.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 33(3): 231-234.
Hewitt, Simon. 2018. “God Is Not a Person (an Argument Via Pantheism).” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 85(3): 281–296.
Hofstadter, Douglas. 1986. Metamagical themas. New York: Bantam Books.
Holmes, Stephen R. 2014. “One Eternal God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.” Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology 32(1): 28–39.
Leftow, Brian. 2009. “Anti Social Trinitarianism.” In Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity,, edited by Thomas McCall and Michael C. Rea, 52–88. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Lewis Herman, Judith. 2001.Trauma and Recovery: From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. London: Basic Books.
Lewis, Marc D. 2002. “The Dialogical Brain: Contributions of Emotional Neurobiology to Understanding the Dialogical Self.” Theory and Psychology 12(2): 175–190.
Moore, Helen, Carol, Jasper and Gillespie, Alex. 2011. “Moving between Frames: The Basis of the Stable and Dialogical Self.” Culture and Psychology 17(4): 510-519.
Nielsen, Lauge O. 2007. “Logic and the Trinity: The Clash between Hervaeus Natalis and Peter Auriol at Paris.” In Trinitarian Theology in the Medieval West, 149–187. Helsingin Yliopisto: Luther-Agricola-Seura.
Nir, Dina. 2012. “Voicing Inner Conflict: From a Dialogical Negotiation to a Negotiational Self.” In The Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory, edited by Hubert J.M. Hermans and Thorsten Gieser, 284-300. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Reilly, Francisco and Franck, Juan F. (eds.). Forthcoming. ¿Es Dios persona? Aproximaciones a la discusión sobre la naturaleza de Dios.
Oyserman, D. & Elmore, K. & Smith, G. 2012. “Self, Self-Concept, and Identity.” In The Handbook of Self and Identity, edited by J. Tangney and M. Leary, 69-104. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Page, Ben. 2019. “Wherein Lies the Debate? Concerning Whether God Is a Person.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85: 297-317.
Pawl, Timothy. 2020. “Conciliar Trinitarianism, Divine Identity Claims, and Subordination.” TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology, 1-27.
Peyk, Peter, Harald T. Schupp, Andreas Keil, Thomas Elbert, and Markus Junghöfer. 2009. “Parallel Processing of Affective Visual Stimuli.” Psychophysiology 46(1): 200-208.
Plantinga, Alvin. 1980. Does God Have a Nature? The Aquinas Lecture. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Ratzinger, Joseph. 1990. “Concerning the Notion of Person in Theology.” Communio 71(3): 439-454.
Ribeiro, António P. , and Miguel M. Gonçalves. 2012. “Narrative Processes of Innovation and Stability within the Dialogical Self.” In Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory, edited by Hubert J.M. Hermans and Thorsten Gieser, 301-318. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rowland, Tracey. 2010. Benedict Xvi: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark.
Rowland, Tracey. 2017. Catholic Theology. Oxford: Bloomsbury T & T Clark.
Smith, James K.A. 2014. How (Not) to Be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor. Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans.
Stump, Eleonore. 2016. The God of the Bible and the God of the Philosophers. The Aquinas Lectures. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
Swinburne, Richard. 1993. The Coherence of Theism. Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy. Rev. ed. Oxford: OUP.
Swinburne, Richard. 2016. The Coherence of Theism (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Te Velde, Rudi A. 2011. “The Divine Person(S) Trinity, Person, and Analogous Naming”. In The Oxford Handbook of the Trinity, edited by Gilles Emery and Matthew Levering, 359-370. Oxford, UK: OUP.
van der Kolk, Bessel. 2014. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. London, UK: Penguin Books.
Wechsler, Stephen. 2010. "What 'You' and 'I' Mean to Each Other: Person Indexicals, Self-Ascription, and Theory of Mind.” Language 86(2): 332–365.
Williams, C. J. F. 1994. “Neither Confounding the Persons nor Dividing the Substance”. In Reason and the Christian Religion: Essays in Honour of Richard Swinburne, edited by A. G. Padgett, 227–243. New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Scott M. 2012. “Henry of Ghent on Real Relations and the Trinity: The Case for Numerical Sameness without Identity.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 79: 109–148.
Williams, Scott M. 2013. “Indexicals and the Trinity: Two Non-Social Models.” Journal of Analytic Theology 1: 74-94.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia et Fides
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY ND 4.0. The Creator/Contributor is the Licensor, who grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work on the fields indicated in the License Agreement.
- The Licensor grants the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Work/related rights item specified in § 1 within the following fields: a) recording of Work/related rights item; b) reproduction (multiplication) of Work/related rights item in print and digital technology (e-book, audiobook); c) placing the copies of the multiplied Work/related rights item on the market; d) entering the Work/related rights item to computer memory; e) distribution of the work in electronic version in the open access form on the basis of Creative Commons license (CC BY-ND 3.0) via the digital platform of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Press and file repository of the Nicolaus Copernicus University.
- Usage of the recorded Work by the Licensee within the above fields is not restricted by time, numbers or territory.
- The Licensor grants the license for the Work/related rights item to the Licensee free of charge and for an unspecified period of time.
FULL TEXT License Agreement
Number of views and downloads: 177
Number of citations: 0