Galileo on the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities (I). A Superessentialist Argument
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2022.002Keywords
Galileo, primary and secondary qualities, superessentialism, mechanicism, sense perceptionAbstract
Galileo’s distinction between primary and secondary qualities has hitherto been examined almost exclusively from a contextual, historical perspective. This paper, the first of two planned, aims to fill this gap by providing a systematic, theoretical analysis of his principal argument for the distinction, as advanced in The Assayer. I begin with a reconstruction of the key steps in the argument,
and then proceed to identify and discuss the epistemological and ontological presuppositions underpinning it. I argue that the most crucial and original assumption behind Galileo’s reasoning is the superessentialist principle, implying the mutual conditionality of the essentiality and reality of a material body’s properties. An in-depth analysis of the assumptions underlying Galileo’s reasoning
paves the way for further examination of the most controversial aspect of his theory, that is, the ontological status of the secondary qualities.
References
Arystoteles. 1978. „Topiki”. W: Arystoteles, Topiki. O dowodach sofistycznych, przeł. Kazimierz Leśniak, 1–235. Warszawa: PWN.
Baldin Gregorio 2020. Hobbes and Galileo: Method, Matter and the Science of Motion. Cham: Springer.
Bechler Zev. 1991. Newton’s Physics and the Conceptual Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ben-Yami Hanoch. 2015. Descartes’ Philosophical Revolution: A Reassessment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burtt Edwin A. 1932. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science. London: Kegan, Trench, Trubner, 2nd rev. ed.
Butts Robert E. 1978. „Some Tactics in Galileo’s Propaganda for the Mathematization of Scientific Experience”. W: New Perspectives on Galileo, red. Robert E. Butts, Joseph C. Pitt, 59–85. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Buyse Filip. 2015. „The Distinction between Primary Properties and Secondary Qualities in Galileo Galilei’s Natural Philosophy”. Cahiers du Séminaire québécois en philosophie modern / Working Papers of the Quebec Seminar in Early Modern Philosophy 1: 20–45.
Charlesworth Maurice. 1987. „Hacker on Secondary Qualities”. Mind. New Series 96 (383): 386–391.
Coniglione Francesco. 2016. „Galileo and Contemporary Epistemology. Do We Still Have Something to Learn from Galileo’s ‘Methodological Revolution’?”. Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria 25 (1): 123–140.
Crombie Alistair C. 1967. „The Primary Properties and Secondary Qualities in Galileo Galilei’s Natural Philosophy”. W: Saggi su Galileo Galilei, red. Carlo Maccagni, 71–91. Firenze: G. Barbèra.
De Caro Mario. 2018. „On Galileo’s Platonism, Again”. W: Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science, red. Raffaele Pisano, Joseph Agassi, Daria Drozdova, 85–104. Cham: Springer.
Descartes René. 2001. Zasady filozofii, przeł. Izydora Dąmbska. Kęty: Antyk.
Dijksterhuis Eduard J. 1961. The Mechanization of the World Picture, przeł. C. Dikshoorn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Downing Lisa. 2011. „Sensible Qualities and Material Bodies in Descartes and Boyle”. W: Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, red. Lawrence Nolan, 109–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ekelund Robert B., Mark Thornton. 2011. „Galileo, Smith and the Paradox of Value: The ‘Connection’ of Art and Science”. History of Economic Ideas 19 (1): 85–101.
Fischer Eugen. 2009. „Philosophical Pictures and Secondary Qualities”. Synthese 171 (1): 77–110.
Gabbey Alan. 2004. „What Was ‘Mechanical’ about ‘The Mechanical Philosophy’?”. W: The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe, red. Carla R. Palmerino, J. M. M. H. Thijssen, 11–23. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Galilei Galileo. 1613. Istoria e dimostrazio interno alle macchie solari e loro accidenti. Roma: Giacomo Mascardi.
Galilei Galileo. 1623. Il Saggiatore. Roma: Giacomo Mascardi.
Galilei Galileo. 2009. Waga probiercza, przeł. Agnieszka Maciąg, Tadeusz Sierotowicz. Kraków–Tarnów: Biblos.
Garber Daniel. 2013. „Remarks on the Pre-history of the Mechanical Philosophy”. W: The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, red. Daniel Garber, Sophie Roux, 3–26. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Geymonat Ludovico. 1965. Galileo Galilei: A Biography and Inquiry into His Philosophy of Science, przeł. Drake Stillman. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gilbert Neal W. 1963. „Galileo and the School of Padua”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 1 (2): 223–231.
Hacker Peter M. S. 1987. Appearance and Reality: A Philosophical Investigation into Perception and Perceptual Qualities. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hacker Peter M. S. 2014. „A Dialogue on Secondary Qualities”. The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 63: 117–150.
Hamou Philippe. 2011. „Qualities and Sensory Perception”. W: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, red. Desmond M. Clarke, Catherine Wilson, 160–181. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jammer Max. 1997. Concept of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Johnson William E. 1924. Logic. Part III: The Logical Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koertge Noretta. 1977. „Galileo and the Problem of Accidents”. Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (3): 389–408.
LoLordo Antonia. 2011. „Gassendi and the Seventeenth-Century Atomists on Primary and Secondary Qualities”. W: Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, red. Lawrence Nolan, 62–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martinez Julio A. 1974. „Galileo on Primary and Secondary Qualities”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 10 (2): 160–169.
Monadori Fabrizio. 1985. „Understanding Superessentialism”. Studia Leibnitiana 17 (2): 162–190.
Osler Margaret J. 1973. „Galileo, Motion, and Essences”. Isis 64 (4): 504–509.
Pasnau Robert. 2011. „Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary”. W: Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, red. Lawrence Nolan, 41–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Piccolino Marco, Nicholas J. Wade. 2014. Galileo’s Visions: Piercing the Spheres of the Heavens by Eye and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prudovsky Gad. 1995. „Arguments from Conceivability”. Ratio. New Series 7 (1): 63–69.
Redondi Pietro. 1987. Galileo Heretic (Galileo Eretico), przeł. Raymond Rosenthal. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rickless Samuel C. 2018. „Qualities”. W: The Routledge Companion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy, red. Dan Kaufmann, 60–86. London: Routledge.
Robertson Ishii Teresa, Philip Atkins. 2020. „Essential vs. Accidental Properties”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, red. Edward N. Zalta. Winter 2020 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/essential-accidental/.
Shea William R. 1970. „Galileo Atomic Hypothesis”. Ambix 17 (1): 13–27.
Sinico Michele. 2015. „Tertiary Qualities, from Galileo to Gestalt Psychology”. History of the Human Sciences 28 (3): 68–79.
Smith Adam. 2021. „O zmysłach zewnętrznych”. W: Adam Smith, Eseje filozoficzne, przeł. Adam Grzeliński, Anna Markwart, 33–84. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK.
Studtmann Paul. 2021. „Aristotle’s Categories”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, red. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2021 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/aristotle-categories/.
Wilson Jessica. 2021. „Determinables and Determinates”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, red. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2021 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/determinate-determinables/.
Zanin Fabio. 2009. „From Common Sensibles to Primary Properties. Rethinking Galilei’s Famous Distinction in Il Saggiatore”. Organon 41: 183–193.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Bartosz Żukowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 456
Number of citations: 0
