Reflection About the Necessity of Amending Art. 8 par. 2a of the Social Security System Act on the Example of the Medical Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PBPS.2014.039Keywords
social insurance contributions, medical activity, medical professionsAbstract
The publication discusses the problem of a controversial interpretation of art. 8 paragraph. 2a of the Social Security Act, requiring hospital treatment as actual beneficiaries “work” of doctors and nurses (midwives) on duty under civil law contracts - signed with a third party. The author analyzes the accuracy of the interpretation from the perspective of medical activity assumptions, which specificity seems to be so far marginalized in the process of applying the law. The result of the author's considerations are demands to work on the amendment of the law on social insurance system taking into account the specific conditions of the exercise of the medical profession.References
Antonów K., Zakres podmiotowy obowiązkowego ubezpieczenia emerytalnego, [w:] T. Bińczycka-Majewska, Konstrukcje prawa emerytalnego, Kraków 2004.
Gudowska B., Strusińska-Żukowska J., Ustawa o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2011.
Wagner B., Prawo pracowników do ubezpieczenia chorobowego, „Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne” 2000, nr 5, s. 2–10.
Downloads
Published
2014-12-28
How to Cite
1.
WĄSIK, Damian. Reflection About the Necessity of Amending Art. 8 par. 2a of the Social Security System Act on the Example of the Medical Activity. State and Local Government Budget Law. Online. 28 December 2014. Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 87-102. [Accessed 13 March 2025]. DOI 10.12775/PBPS.2014.039.
Issue
Section
Articles
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 444
Number of citations: 0